Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 2:30 am
Thread Rating:
Evolution 'proved' wrong
|
You're fucking joking, right?
From the article: Quote:If natural selection were true, Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. Do you really expect me to take any of this seriously? (May 30, 2014 at 9:09 pm)Cato Wrote: You're fucking joking, right? Surely not, but there seems to be alot of people trying to debate evolution. (May 30, 2014 at 9:21 pm)BlackSwordsman Wrote: Surely not, but there seems to be alot of people trying to debate evolution. What they do is not remotely considered debate. They merely ramble nonsensically.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter (May 30, 2014 at 9:24 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(May 30, 2014 at 9:21 pm)BlackSwordsman Wrote: Surely not, but there seems to be alot of people trying to debate evolution. I noticed that, but the first link that I got was from this site, which said it could prove evolution false without using the bible RE: Evolution 'proved' wrong
May 30, 2014 at 9:29 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2014 at 9:29 pm by Napoléon.)
You're on the fucking "United Church of God" website. The fuck. You actually think this is the right place to be looking at information about evolution?
(May 30, 2014 at 9:29 pm)Napoléon Wrote: You're on the fucking "United Church of God" website. The fuck. You actually think this is the right place to be looking at information about evolution? Didn't even notice that! i saw UCG didn't get the meaning. my bad. Rephrasing the question: Can evolution be disproved? (May 30, 2014 at 9:33 pm)BlackSwordsman Wrote:(May 30, 2014 at 9:29 pm)Napoléon Wrote: You're on the fucking "United Church of God" website. The fuck. You actually think this is the right place to be looking at information about evolution? Theoretically, yes. If a theory which better explains and predicts the available data comes along, sure. Hard to imagine how anything radically different than evolution could accomplish that. More likely refinements will continue, but nothing major. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Evolution "fails" AKA "where god seems to have got it wrong" | Duty | 44 | 3309 |
February 6, 2022 at 8:56 am Last Post: Jehanne |
|
What's wrong with Japanese Dogs? | purplepurpose | 14 | 1767 |
July 29, 2018 at 9:30 am Last Post: Little Rik |
|
This is just wrong | brewer | 59 | 8406 |
December 22, 2016 at 11:22 pm Last Post: ignoramus |
|
Darwin Proven Wrong? | sswhateverlove | 165 | 28200 |
September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm Last Post: Mister Agenda |
|
Did Darwin get it wrong? | Zone | 20 | 5088 |
September 19, 2013 at 9:58 am Last Post: Brian37 |
|
Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. | Mystic | 59 | 32412 |
April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
What's right (wrong?) with me? | Tea Earl Grey Hot | 9 | 2667 |
December 15, 2012 at 8:09 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)