Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 9:53 am
Thread Rating:
Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?
|
(October 6, 2014 at 10:59 pm)genkaus Wrote: Sounds like Alice needs to start taking her meds again.I'm pretty sure it would quickly disprove this assertion: (October 6, 2014 at 8:19 pm)Alice Wrote: Scientific process has no impact besides that which the individual feels it does...But in all seriousness, this statement truly was the pinnacle of the LULZ in all of the dumb, ignorant things she said here today.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
RE: Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?
October 7, 2014 at 12:04 am
(This post was last modified: October 7, 2014 at 12:25 am by Chas.)
(October 6, 2014 at 12:58 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: God is so good that the definition has to come from him. One thing you can be sure of. Because you say so? Oh, sure. I'm soooo convinced. (October 6, 2014 at 1:20 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: No, he is goodness, otherwise he couldn't be him. That is circular, you silly hobbit. (October 6, 2014 at 5:29 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Just to be clear, my definition of nihilism is very broad: holding that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. Not brains, minds. Minds emerge from the functioning of brains. And it is not a closed, self-referential system; it is an open self-referential system, continuously updated with fresh input and fresh connections and patterns. Your 'explanation' assumes the existence of that for which there is no evidence. Dualism is an incoherent concept.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method. (October 6, 2014 at 11:39 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'm an Atheist and Nihilist and I say yes. Atheists who are reject Nihilism are being intellectually dishonest. Go ahead and prove it then. (October 6, 2014 at 11:39 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: That you feel that your life has meaning has no bearing on whether or not it actually does. You can supply meaning all you want but that doesn't mean anything. In 100 years all that meaning that you've convinced yourself of will likely be pointless. That's like saying that since what you eat today, you'll shit tomorrow, you might as well not have eaten at all. (October 6, 2014 at 11:39 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Rather than saying that it means that you should just mope around (like half the people on this fourm do anyway) it means that my life is truly free for me to do whatever I like with it. Except you can't do whatever you like. RE: Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?
October 7, 2014 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 7, 2014 at 12:40 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(October 6, 2014 at 11:39 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'm an Atheist and Nihilist and I say yes. Atheists who are reject Nihilism are being intellectually dishonest. History is littered with folks who not only defined their own lives for themselves in their lifetimes, but had those definitions accepted by others by dint of their actions. In a hundred years I may not be around to think one way or the other about the meaning of my life, but, if lived correctly, others will think my life means as I intended. I'm not confusing nihilism with crybabyism. I'm rejecting the idea that how I define myself must bow to your definition of me. You may think my life has no meaning. That, and three bucks, will get you a cuppa joe at Starbucks. If you're not willing to assign meaning to your life, that's fine. It's no surprise that someone who finds their own life meaningless should cast aspersions upon the significance of others. Skating is easier downhill. eta: Also, I've emboldened the passage where you're begging the question. RE: Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?
October 7, 2014 at 12:40 am
(This post was last modified: October 7, 2014 at 12:46 am by Mudhammam.)
(October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: Reiterate it. I didn't see any issue with whatever it was the first time, so clearly its importance in whatever it is has yet to be conveyed.Okay. Moreover, I'll just watch while you argue with yourself. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: All positive claims are real. Almost all of them are ultimately false. I've no reason to consider my own positive claims to be any more true than anyone else's.So, the following statements you're going to make are almost ultimately... false? (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: I'll reiterate:Please. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: understanding TRUTH for *anyone* is an inherently impossible taskIncluding... that. Like I said, self-refuting. You make this too damn easy. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: We CAN know ANYTHING with ABSOLUTE certainty. We often do know more than we ought with relative certainty.Are you high? Are you even reading what you write? (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: The reality is that probably we're not aware of 'the reality', and can only form our best guesses around whatever apparent consistency our experiences might have in common.Ohhhhh. Because you received that "knowledge" about "reality" last time you took a hit of acid? Dreamt it in your sleep? The reality is that yes, mostly everything we *think* we know is an approximation of the truth, measured for its degree of accuracy--i.e. as a true representation of the objective world--by clear thinking derived by definitions that logically cohere, both conceptually and with multiple, varying perceptions of said world, which we furthermore test using tried and proven instrumentation developed through the trial and error that results from the scientific method. None of this has anything to do with faith in the traditional sense as belief in a proposition not sufficiently supported by evidence given in our shared experiences, and in spite of reasonable doubt. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: This is why we have exceptions to rules, and not all-encompassing rules. Trying to get every relevant card nailed down into any one rule is impossible when we can't really tell which game we are playing. Is it cheating... or are we cheating?That's like, so deep! (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: Faith is belief is confidence is knowledge.Not in the religious usage of the word faith, which is precisely why I reject its appropriateness here. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: You do have faith in the reasons and evidence you're using to support your beliefs, do you not? You'd have to, if you believe in the findings resultant from such things.Nope. Faith is not required for existence. It does not require faith to understand and know beyond a reasonable doubt that "I exist" is a true statement. I do trust that when I talk to someone outside of my "self," they understand the words I am using and their correlation to the objects in the objective world that I am attempting to describe. That trust is established on the very success of that process in past experience, the source of all knowledge, though, I confess, it is rapidly eroding right now. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: This is built upon layer and layer... there is no prerequisite for faith that states it is necessarily unreasonable. In truth, it is often quite the opposite... whether the reasons be good or bad, valid or not, is irrelevant to the process that is reasoning.Obviously, we disagree on the usefulness or application of the term "faith" in the context of this conversation, none of which is dependent on logical principles or inferences not found in immediate experience. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: Other minds exist. Whether they exist outside of my own head, on the other hand... that's why solipsists are incorrigible: there is literally no perceptible difference. They are only wrong when they suggest that everything does not exist... because insomuch as their thinking proves their being: a table's splintering proves it's being. In each argument, existence is already assumed, because nonexistence is inherently impossible through logic: if it doesn't exist, then there's nothing to be defined. Nothing to test, nothing to contest.So glad you cleared that up for us. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: That's all we've got in the end: what usually works for us. All reasoning is itself arbitrary,No, wrong again, for the reasons I've already given. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: the goal: whether or not it convinces a person of any particular thing.A goal that effects our ability to survive and thrive. (October 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Alice Wrote: Further, should justifications for a belief ultimately succeed in the establishment of persuasion... how strongly such convictions are held is affected by how enamored they have become within such.Yes, tempered by the soundness of the reasoning and the evidence which is available.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Fucking Christ, I hate solipsism.
(October 7, 2014 at 12:38 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: . He does give his life meaning. Nihilism, to him, means he's free to do what he likes. That's my issue with nihilism, it implodes on itself whenever I entertain the idea. Am I doing it wrong or is this a common experience? (October 7, 2014 at 12:45 am)Exian Wrote:(October 7, 2014 at 12:38 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: . It's hard for me to escape the feeling that that is a semantic objection. Just because "nihilism" has a meaning doesn't mean that he assigns any meaning to his own life. What's happening here, I think, is that two different connotations of "meaning" are being equivocated. I don't know that you're thinking wrong or right. I do know that this is a very rare experience for me -- a philosophical discussion that is interesting.
Find me a functioning nihilist if by that we mean one who doesn't believe in anything.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)