Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 2, 2024, 9:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(March 21, 2018 at 9:34 am)Joods Wrote:
(March 20, 2018 at 7:18 pm)Hammy Wrote: I didn't even say you said anything. See what I mean by talking another language?

You quoted me and then went on with your wall of text. How else would you like for that to be taken other than as a direct post to myself?

Nice dodge tho.

You claimed I put words in your mouth and I didn't. You're the one dodging if anyone is. What did I say you said? What words did I put in your mouth? And don't dodge, answer the questions. The answer is "nothing" isn't it?

You often claim I'm full of shit, but it's you that is full of shit.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(March 21, 2018 at 9:49 am)Hammy Wrote:
(March 21, 2018 at 9:34 am)Joods Wrote: You quoted me and then went on with your wall of text. How else would you like for that to be taken other than as a direct post to myself?

Nice dodge tho.

You claimed I put words in your mouth and I didn't. You're the one dodging if anyone is. What did I say you said? What words did I put in your mouth? And don't dodge, answer the questions. The answer is "nothing" isn't it?

You often claim I'm full of shit, but it's you that is full of shit.

Fuck off. You don't even bother to read half of what you write most of the time. You write shit, clearly intended to get in a jab and then when called out on it, you feign ignorance. Enough already. You might be 30 years old chronologically, but you act like a god dammned three year old. If your post wasn't directed at me, as you say, then you shouldn't have quoted me in your post. Plain and simple. 

Stop responding to my posts and put me back on ignore. All you ever do is write posts that are all about you. Redundant walls of text trying to gain sympathy from anyone who fall for it. This "woe is me" routine is old. I have never in my life met someone more needier than you. I will not coddle you or treat you with kid gloves when clearly, your agenda is to get as many people kissing your ass as you can.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(March 21, 2018 at 9:57 am)Joods Wrote:
(March 21, 2018 at 9:49 am)Hammy Wrote: You claimed I put words in your mouth and I didn't. You're the one dodging if anyone is. What did I say you said? What words did I put in your mouth? And don't dodge, answer the questions. The answer is "nothing" isn't it?

You often claim I'm full of shit, but it's you that is full of shit.

Fuck off. You don't even bother to read half of what you write most of the time. You write shit, clearly intended to get in a jab and then when called out on it, you feign ignorance. Enough already. You might be 30 years old chronologically, but you act like a god dammned three year old. If your post wasn't directed at me, as you say, then you shouldn't have quoted me in your post. Plain and simple. 

Stop responding to my posts and put me back on ignore. All you ever do is write posts that are all about you. Redundant walls of text trying to gain sympathy from anyone who fall for it. This "woe is me" routine is old. I have never in my life met someone more needier than you. I will not coddle you or treat you with kid gloves when clearly, your agenda is to get as many people kissing your ass as you can.

Nice dodge. And as predicted you couldn't point out which words I supposedly put in your mouth because I really didn't despite your claim otherwise (more bullshit about me being dishonest while you lie your ass off) and you really are full of shit. And yes you are worthy of the ignore button so back on you go. You're a lot older than me and a lot more cranky and immature than me... and I should fuck off? Go fuck yourself miss hypocrite and on ignore you go. At least I'm NOT full of shit unlike yourself.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Would you guys mind not to do this?
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Not a problem. As of now, he's on my ignore list. I can no longer deal with this sort of stupid.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
People don't get to randomly accuse me of being a liar and putting words in their mouth, and then tell me I'm dodging while dodging my questions of what words I supposedly put in their mouth. Because I didn't put any in their mouth and they know it. I've never seen someone project their own flaws onto me so hard.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(March 21, 2018 at 9:23 am)SaStrike Wrote:
(March 20, 2018 at 1:54 pm)Shell B Wrote: So many threads get closed these days. It's lame. That's my commentary.

Shells, let it go, mate.

Haha, I mentioned it once. Not comparable.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
And notice she told me to fuck off before I said anything like that to her. And apparently I'm the immature one.

IMO accusing someone of dodging when they are the sort of person that says what they thinks and doesn't dodge anything, and then accusing them of putting words in their mouth when they did no such thing, and then dodging that yourself once they call you out on it and telling them to fuck off rather than pointing out what they supposedly said because they didn't actually say. Is it just me or is THAT immature behavior on their part? Rather than face the fact that I didn't dodge anything and that I didn't put words in her mouth because she's unable to point out what I said she said because I didn't say ANYBODY said anything, rather than face the fact that I'm right she'll tell me to fuck off. Like her little ego can't ever take me being right about anything and she'd rather project her own dodging onto me and spew insults. It's super ironic that after telling me I'm dodging her next post is a dodge. She's basically Miss Projection at this point. No wonder she keeps calling me dishonest when she's clearly a very dishonest person herself. I'm so honest I'm too honest.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(March 20, 2018 at 1:54 pm)Shell B Wrote: So many threads get closed these days. It's lame. That's my commentary.

I recently 'put down' some threads. I don't do it lightly, but in this case they were identical postings, most had no replies and were violating the TOS. Even then, I don't lightly do that. Despite a goodly number of admins and mods, sometimes action is warranted and there aren't too many staff on line to consult with. Forum software does allow us to highlight a thread so most of the members cannot see it but staff can, and that condition can be undone if upon reflection it is decided a given thread is OK. It's always a tough call for me to blip an entire thread even if the opening post in a thread violates the Terms of Service but there are responses to it that do not.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
I would have liked to see one of pool's threads that got him banned. Just out of curiosity. I get deleting the subsequent repetitive ones, but would have been interested in seeing the original.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  i keep getting contradictory messages from staff rocinantexyz 12 2517 November 29, 2022 at 4:37 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Staff Foxaèr 28 4197 February 5, 2019 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  What Does This Mean, Oh Staff? Minimalist 24 5660 July 15, 2017 at 1:35 am
Last Post: c172
  Staff Appreciation Thread Shell B 41 7962 December 4, 2016 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  blocking ex staff members Catholic_Lady 68 6640 November 17, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues pocaracas 283 32554 July 11, 2016 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Unable to log in to my account Mermaid 42 6129 March 30, 2016 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Thumbs Up Kudos for such Great forums!! Orchids 24 6140 September 22, 2015 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: Losty
  Blueberry muffins and birthdays and other such things. Losty 13 4292 May 16, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Last Post: Dystopia
  Staff....Once The Strike Ends...Strange Error Message Minimalist 1 2043 April 5, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)