RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 10:42 pm by Huggy Bear.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2026, 2:45 am
Thread Rating:
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 7:54 pm)Joods Wrote: Maybe the thread should be split if it's going to involve Huggy trying to prove a point. Isn't "winning" the debate by proving some random, usually irrelevant, point Smuggies M.O.?!?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:35 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 7:54 pm)Joods Wrote: Maybe the thread should be split if it's going to involve Huggy trying to prove a point. Usually. That and quote mining. Let's not forget that as a requirement for that fool to even attempt to make a point. Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:42 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 10:45 pm by Fireball.)
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:47 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 10:42 pm)Fireball Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 10:02 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Several weeks ago? you mean this post from 6 months ago? Huggy broke Fireball. That’s how stupid he is, lol. ?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:51 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 11:01 pm by Angrboda.)
(September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 10:03 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: No, it simply shows that you're capable of the fallacy of ignoratio elenchi. You were claiming that the original Hebrews were black. For evidence you brought out that some of the oldest Jewish communities in Africa were black, and that an Ethiopian came to Jerusalem and read Jewish literature. Neither of those show that the original Hebrews were black, much less indisputably so. No it's not, Huggy. Your adding the term ancient doesn't add anything to it. That the communities in Africa are the most ancient communities in Africa doesn't mean that they were the original Hebrews. Even according to the bible, there were 12 generations preceding Moses. So you're not even close, in addition to having once again committed ignoratio elenchi. If I were the oldest member of my family living in America, it wouldn't show that my original family was American. Additionally, your passage from Exodus doesn't demonstrate anything because Moses was an Egyptian by adoption and not by birth, so that he was considered an Egyptian by the daughters of Midian doesn't show that he was black. But by all means, keep adding to the Dunning-Kruger argument instead of subtracting from it. (In addition, I don't believe you brought up the Exodus passage in the original thread, so it would be irrelevant anyway. You claimed you had consistently won debates against Khem, past tense; any new arguments you make aren't relevant to whether you won the debate.) ![]() RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:52 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 10:42 pm)Fireball Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 10:02 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Several weeks ago? you mean this post from 6 months ago? If you say so... The fact that I had an interaction with you 7 months ago (which was the last one) and you remember it like it was last week, says a lot more about you than me... RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:52 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Joods Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Isn't "winning" the debate by proving some random, usually irrelevant, point Smuggies M.O.?!? Let's not forget moving the goalposts all over hell and back. I even thought of suggesting that if they implement that smiley, that it be given the code :huggy: Didn't think Tibs would like the idea though.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 10:55 pm
This is all fun and games and all, but I’m still wondering why his name is huggy. Everything else is self explanatory.
"Hipster is what happens when young hot people do what old ladies do." -Exian
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 11:02 pm
(September 23, 2018 at 10:51 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 10:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: The term used was 'ancient' not oldest... Sigh... The daughter of Midian had no idea Moses was adopted, he was a fugitive at this time, they said he was Egyptian based on his appearance.... But that was NOT Khemikals argument, his argument was implying that Christianity wasn't in Africa before the Atlantic slave trade. The point I was making was that not only did black Christians exist before the Atlantic slave trade, but we go back much further. I see how you're completely avoiding that subject. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)





STILL KING of the quote mine! And still dumber than a bag of hammers. This makes the last time I respond to a post of yours, or a response thereof. It's only been done this time to demonstrate what a fucking idjit you are, to illuminate another's response. You know, I generally try to avoid pointing how actually stupid people can be, since it is kind of mean to do. You got me this time. It won't happen again. :nod:![[Image: blackpharoahsnationalgeographic.jpg]](https://meagainstiniquity.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/blackpharoahsnationalgeographic.jpg)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/a6a72vica8gsyddmkhtxp/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrpk9dzrupouidnfvtl)