Damned Democunts

[Brakeman]

Trickle down economics isn't about giving corporations less government money. It was about government taking less money from corporations.

Ha Ha .. That's funny. Just how exactly how do you think that is any different?

If the government wrote a check to GE for a million dollars, or the government gave a million dollar tax reprieve to GE, how would those differ on GE's 10-K?


How would you describe a "TOP Down economic model?" I'd love to hear what Hillary's supposedly been pushing for.

[Neo-Scholastic]

The difference between Min's threads and yours is not POV, it's substance.

Minimal substance.

[Brakeman]

The difference between Min's threads and yours is not POV, it's substance.

Minimal substance.

Citation needed.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Your unreasonable bias comes from somewhere, fox news is a pretty good guess, but of course you could get it from numerous sources, even imagine it yourself.

My bias is against an overreaching government. What, exactly, is unreasonable about that? Be specific.

[Brakeman]

My bias is against an overreaching government. What, exactly, is unreasonable about that? Be specific.

I'm also a strong proponent of resisting overreach by the government, but this case is not it.

Remember how I said "What is it about Republicans and LYING??"
Well thanks to your pushing, I went to find the source.

When I googled "Ohio anti-President Obama Internet campaign" I was swamped with page after page of right wing nuttery websites. No info there..

Don't you think it odd that none of those websites actually posted the public document proposal.. That's really odd isn't it. Well it would be if they weren't all lying sons of bitches..

Here's the actual proposal, it's not about the videos AT ALL! it's about paying people to post them and other things on the internet. If you work for a campaign then you have to record their salaries.

http://www.fec.gov/audits/2010/Republica...24RPIA.pdf

I wanted to post sections of it but the PDF is locked. You'll have to read it yourself, it's very short.

[Heywood]

Here's the actual proposal, it's not about the videos AT ALL! it's about paying people to post them and other things on the internet. If you work for a campaign then you have to record their salaries.

http://www.fec.gov/audits/2010/Republica...24RPIA.pdf

I wanted to post sections of it but the PDF is locked. You'll have to read it yourself, it's very short.

Your link has nothing to do with the Ohio hearing and subsequent statement by Vice Chair Ravel expressing a desire to regulate campaign ads posted on the internet.

[Heywood]

Damned Democunts have no respect for women.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/28/politics/a...index.html

A candidate calls his opponent a whore and they all have a good laugh. What a bunch of assholes.

[FatAndFaithless]

Heywood, if you think an obvious slip of the tongue is the same as the GOP's shit, you're in an echo chamber of bullshit.

[Heywood]

Heywood, if you think an obvious slip of the tongue is the same as the GOP's shit, you're in an echo chamber of bullshit.

If a republican candidate slipped his tongue....calling Obama a nigger instead of a nagger....and then chuckled....along with the crowd which was laughing.....the democunts would be justified in calling that republicunt and his republicunt supporters racist.

The slip of the tongue is forgivable....its the enjoyment of it afterwards that is despicable. Its their behavior after the slip that reveals their true feelings about women.

[FatAndFaithless]

I really don't think that we would crucify someone for a slip of the tongue even if they had an "oopsie" chuckle afterwards. If these are the straws that you have to grasp at to try and equate the GOP and Democrats, then I suppose that's all you got. I've got some serious beefs with some Democratic Party positions myself, but the GOP's scientific and social views are so far out in the realm of bullshittery that trying to drag Democrats down to their level is laughable.