Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 2:53 am
(October 29, 2014 at 11:09 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: The argument that masturbation is good (or acceptable) because it does no harm to anyone or because it has potential health benefits are a different argument to me than simply saying that it's good (or acceptable) because it's a natural human act.
Lol, you're but one step away from inventing Euthyphro's Wanking dilemma.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 4:00 am
I actually think that masturbation makes young males like myself less likely to tape and murder. Lack of sexual outlet can make men very anxious and sometimes aggressive, especially in men with high drives and a lower abilities of self control.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 46417
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 4:23 am
Masturbation is good for lots of reasons, but being natural isn't what makes it good.
1. You don't have to talk afterwards.
2. You don't have to walk home in the dark.
3. You're always 'a sure thing'.
4. You don't have to wait til her husband's out of town.
Lots of things are 'natural' - head lice, shitting out of doors, being eaten by wolves, etc. - but being natural makes something neither good nor desirable.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 6:46 am
(October 29, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: I was just making dinner and thinking about masturbation (because, you know, why not?) I get that a lot...
(October 29, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: and got to thinking about the standard defense rolled out of "it's perfectly natural to masturbate, it's a normal human act of exploring your own sexuality and yadda yadda yadda..." and got to wondering whether this falls prey to the naturalistic fallacy. "The naturalistic fallacy"... I wonder what that is... google, help!
wiki Wrote:In philosophical ethics, the term "naturalistic fallacy" was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica.[1] Moore argues it would be fallacious to explain that which is good reductively in terms of natural properties such as "pleasant" or "desirable".
I guess you're right... I've seen a lot of people around here saying just that.
It's pleasant, it's right!
But, wait, there's more:
wiki Wrote:Moore's naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the is–ought problem, which comes from Hume's Treatise. However, unlike Hume's view of the is–ought problem, Moore (and other proponents of ethical non-naturalism) did not consider the naturalistic fallacy to be at odds with moral realism.
The naturalistic fallacy should not be confused with a fallacious appeal to nature, a mistaken claim that something is good or right because it is natural (or bad or wrong because it is unnatural).
Ah, perhaps you were actually going for this "appeal to nature"?
The same appeal we hear when people are against homosexuals... it's unnatural, hence wrong, hence should be banned, outlawed, criminalized.
Masturbation is natural, hence it's good.
(October 29, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: It's okay to masturbate because it's natural.
Thoughts? Does this qualify as a fallacious argument or not? It seems you were practically right.
As always... as should be expected of a smart person.
(October 29, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: (full disclosure, I haven't given this a huge deal of thought. In fact, I'm still making dinner.)
your place, tonight, I see!
Posts: 3680
Threads: 52
Joined: August 13, 2014
Reputation:
19
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 8:26 am
Mastication should be illegal
Posts: 116
Threads: 0
Joined: October 17, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 11:20 am
(October 29, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: It's okay to masturbate because it's natural.
Thoughts? Does this qualify as a fallacious argument or not?
Not if you permit, or would permit, masterbation because it's natural. :-) I presume that's what you mean by okay?
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 7:29 pm
(October 29, 2014 at 11:09 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: The argument that masturbation is good (or acceptable) because it does no harm to anyone or because it has potential health benefits are a different argument to me than simply saying that it's good (or acceptable) because it's a natural human act. I don't disagree with the statements that it's good (or acceptable) because it doesn't cause harm or it has health befits, my question is specifically about people who defend masturbation "because it's natural."
Based on my understanding the health and harm arguments are satisfactory in the sense that they aren't fallacious, but I think the "because it's natural" argument is.
Ever meet 18 year old that hasn't jerked in a few weeks. With a steady supply of sex? They are so fucking horny that they can barely control themselves. That state leads to bad sexual decisions, and misery.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 8:19 pm
(October 30, 2014 at 8:26 am)DramaQueen Wrote: Mastication should be illegal
I figured it already was in Libya
Posts: 6120
Threads: 64
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 10:08 pm
(October 30, 2014 at 2:35 am)whateverist Wrote: Does masturbation require a rationalization? If you wanna, go ahead. If not, lets eat.
I'm thinking of responses to largely theistic statements that masturbation is bad or wrong because it's a sin or whatever other justifications they use.
It very well could be an appeal to nature rather than a naturalistic fallacy, I guess I'm not that knowledgeable about the difference. Is the appeal to nature not fallacious?
And, yes, Beccs beat you to it. :p
(October 30, 2014 at 6:46 am)pocaracas Wrote: It seems you were practically right.
As always... as should be expected of a smart person.
Thanks, but the bolded part is a little inflated, methinks; sometime I'll have to tell you about the incredibly stupid argument I had with my best friend about Indiana Jones. I was not a smart person during that argument.
Quote:your place, tonight, I see!
Ironically, I just finished making dinner again. Maybe I won't be eating alone...
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
Posts: 35341
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 30, 2014 at 10:18 pm
(October 30, 2014 at 4:23 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Masturbation is good for lots of reasons, but being natural isn't what makes it good.
1. You don't have to talk afterwards.
2. You don't have to walk home in the dark.
3. You're always 'a sure thing'.
4. You don't have to wait til her husband's out of town.
Lots of things are 'natural' - head lice, shitting out of doors, being eaten by wolves, etc. - but being natural makes something neither good nor desirable.
Boru
But if your hand falls asleep, is that the ultimate rejection?
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
|