Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 6, 2024, 2:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
#61
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in god claims. That is the definition.

You can't base a conclusion on a lack of belief in an outlandish claim, other than the conclusion that the claim hasn't met its burden of proof. You are trying to connect atheism to other ideas, and that is faulty. If an individual atheist makes a positive claim about belief, it stands or falls on its own merits and has nothing to do with being an atheist.

What conclusions are these you are talking about, that atheists don't back up when pressed?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#62
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
And yet you seem ok with insisting that atheism is a "belief in the lack of [the] divine" and entails unspoken consequences, responsibility for which that supposed belief absolves us. Are you going to tell us what these consequences are or are we free to put words into your mouth?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#63
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
(November 3, 2014 at 11:32 am)Stimbo Wrote: And yet you seem ok with insisting that atheism is a "belief in the lack of [the] divine" and entails unspoken consequences, responsibility for which that supposed belief absolves us. Are you going to tell us what these consequences are or are we free to put words into your mouth?
Yes, I do believe that ideas have consequences if only to the extent that they guide our thoughts, either explicitly or tacitly, in certain directions. The specific directions vary according to the individual. I have not explored every possible logical consequence of atheism anymore than anyone else could explore the details of every Christian denomination. All the atheistic solutions I have explored seem to correspond with those promoted on AF.
Reply
#64
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
(November 2, 2014 at 8:34 am)dimaniac Wrote: It is scientific and logical

First, shouldn't you establish that they deny it? And second, how do you justify putting the word 'just' in front of something as amazing as a 'biorobot'?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#65
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
(November 3, 2014 at 11:49 am)ChadWooters Wrote: I have not explored every possible logical consequence of atheism anymore than anyone else could explore the details of every Christian denomination. All the atheistic solutions I have explored seem to correspond with those promoted on AF.

I didn't ask for every logical consequence. How about your top five?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#66
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
(November 2, 2014 at 8:06 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(November 2, 2014 at 8:52 am)Brian37 Wrote: What a fucking asinine claim. "atheist" merely denotes "off" on god claims.
...therefore I can avoid taking any further responsibility for what belief in the lack of divine entails...

Therefore you can't fucking assume you know what else we think.

(November 3, 2014 at 11:04 am)ChadWooters Wrote:
(November 2, 2014 at 8:10 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Such as? You're big on the empty rhetoric; not so much on the substance.
Perhaps so. I have learned that as a general rule some people have reached various conclusions based on their atheism. Then when pressed to define those conclusions, they back away into the "no, no, atheism is simply the lack of belief." I suppose it is fair to say atheism doesn't really mean anything other than that disbelief, but it seems to serve many very well as a springboard for various doctrines like naturalism, moral relativism, and fatalism. When that is the case, I think it petty when someone focuses on semantics and not really defend the issues he or she are promoting.

You've got the springboard mixed up with the pool.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#67
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
(November 3, 2014 at 11:53 am)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 3, 2014 at 11:49 am)ChadWooters Wrote: I have not explored every possible logical consequence of atheism anymore than anyone else could explore the details of every Christian denomination. All the atheistic solutions I have explored seem to correspond with those promoted on AF.

I didn't ask for every logical consequence. How about your top five?
Ontological naturalism, physical monism, absurdism, physical causal closure, and radical empiricism...and that's just a start.
Reply
#68
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
Fine. Now how are they logical consequences of "belief in the lack of [the] divine" and how does that alleged belief absolve one of those consequences?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#69
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
Belief in God counters ontological naturalism by providing a basis for formal and final causes. Without these two supplements to efficient and material causes certain features of reality, like the persistence of sensible bodies throughout change, are left unexplained.
Reply
#70
RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
Beep boop, bullshit detected.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are Atheists Afraid to Join Atheists? Asmodeus 10 447 October 26, 2024 at 9:09 am
Last Post: Asmodeus
  Dr. Bill Craig's Debates: Why do Atheists lose/run away from debating him? Nishant Xavier 123 10499 August 6, 2023 at 4:22 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  360 Million Christians Suffering Persecution: why arent Atheists helping? Nishant Xavier 48 3187 July 16, 2023 at 10:05 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Atheists, if God doesnt exist, then explain why Keanu Reeves looks like Jesus Christ Frakki 9 1527 April 1, 2023 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS Rinni92 13 3407 August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm
Last Post: Sal
  Atheists: Why did female with fat butts and short legs exist? Lambe7 14 2386 July 30, 2020 at 7:17 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  [Serious] Why I consider Atheists the Dumbest of the Dumb theMadJW 63 9818 May 13, 2020 at 12:07 am
Last Post: Draconic Aiur
  Atheists: What would you say to a dying child who asks you if they'll go to heaven? DodosAreDead 91 13518 November 2, 2018 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  Why Are Atheists so Stupid Neo-Scholastic 125 18937 October 7, 2018 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 13963 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)