For Creationists.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Hi Brian,
Did the part of my quote where I said, "Your cohorts have been trying to cross..
for a long time" pass your notice.

These experiments have been ongoing for how long?
A hundred years maybe?
Trying (by application of intellect -NOT chance) to cross the genetic limits of
"AFTER THEIR KIND" (or within each kind of biological critter) To NO avail.

How many times do you strike out before the truth dawns on one that the whole shebang is a lie- a deception by the willing for the willing.

Could you possibly provide a list of these failed experiments?

Boru

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Hi Brian,
Did the part of my quote where I said, "Your cohorts have been trying to cross..
for a long time" pass your notice.

These experiments have been ongoing for how long?
A hundred years maybe?
Trying (by application of intellect -NOT chance) to cross the genetic limits of
"AFTER THEIR KIND" (or within each kind of biological critter) To NO avail.

How many times do you strike out before the truth dawns on one that the whole shebang is a lie- a deception by the willing for the willing.

All talk, prof, but little (if any) substance.

[professor]

It was asked of us who are Creationists, our take on micro verses macro.
I gave it.

I do not need to list failed experiments.
They all failed. They all hit the wall.

Your favored scientists generally by-pass their failures, and trumpet their supposed findings.
Funding must be maintained and ballyhooing flubs do not advance it.

I really did not intend for this to be another Creation/ Evolution ride.

[Chad32]

It just bothers them so much when people say they're apes, and Humans and other great apes came from the same thing.

They're proudly descended from a dirt golem and his rib wife, god dammit!!

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

It was asked of us who are Creationists, our take on micro verses macro.
I gave it.

So you did. You simply happen to be wrong.

I do not need to list failed experiments.
They all failed. They all hit the wall.

I strongly suspect there's a valid reason why you can't list the failed experiments you claim took place.

Your favored scientists generally by-pass their failures, and trumpet their supposed findings.
Funding must be maintained and ballyhooing flubs do not advance it.

You've got a rather warped understanding how science operates. Failures are the bedrock of scientific achievement. It's the way we find out how things work.

But I see your point about how funding must be maintained. Biologists have all those 50 room mansions to maintain and gangs of servants to feed.

I really did not intend for this to be another Creation/ Evolution ride.

Yeah, I kind of think you did.

Boru

[Lemonvariable72]

Hi Brian,
Did the part of my quote where I said, "Your cohorts have been trying to cross..
for a long time" pass your notice.

These experiments have been ongoing for how long?
A hundred years maybe?
Trying (by application of intellect -NOT chance) to cross the genetic limits of
"AFTER THEIR KIND" (or within each kind of biological critter) To NO avail.

How many times do you strike out before the truth dawns on one that the whole shebang is a lie- a deception by the willing for the willing.

That is simply untrue. There are no experiments that have outly contradicted evolution. Indeed scientist recently ran a simple but ingenous experiment that with little work me or you could do ourselves. The result was a change in "Kind" from a bacterium, in this case everyday bakers yeast, to a multicellar prokaryote.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21...GalNMm8-vs

[Godscreated]

Hi Brian,
Did the part of my quote where I said, "Your cohorts have been trying to cross..
for a long time" pass your notice.

These experiments have been ongoing for how long?
A hundred years maybe?
Trying (by application of intellect -NOT chance) to cross the genetic limits of
"AFTER THEIR KIND" (or within each kind of biological critter) To NO avail.

How many times do you strike out before the truth dawns on one that the whole shebang is a lie- a deception by the willing for the willing.

That is simply untrue. There are no experiments that have outly contradicted evolution. Indeed scientist recently ran a simple but ingenous experiment that with little work me or you could do ourselves. The result was a change in "Kind" from a bacterium, in this case everyday bakers yeast, to a multicellar prokaryote.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21...GalNMm8-vs

Intelligent manipulation, that's not evolution it how ever does point toward God.

GC

[Lemonvariable72]

That is simply untrue. There are no experiments that have outly contradicted evolution. Indeed scientist recently ran a simple but ingenous experiment that with little work me or you could do ourselves. The result was a change in "Kind" from a bacterium, in this case everyday bakers yeast, to a multicellar prokaryote.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21...GalNMm8-vs

Intelligent manipulation, that's not evolution it how ever does point toward God.

GC

Buahahaha therefore by the way you say it any law or theory of science is totally unprovable.

[downbeatplumb]

It was asked of us who are Creationists, our take on micro verses macro.
I gave it.

I do not need to list failed experiments.
They all failed. They all hit the wall.

Your favored scientists generally by-pass their failures, and trumpet their supposed findings.
Funding must be maintained and ballyhooing flubs do not advance it.

I really did not intend for this to be another Creation/ Evolution ride.

What is the mechanism that suddenly stops evolution and restricts speciation?

Do tell.

[Minimalist]

Other than the fact that creatards remain apes...and dumb ones at that...why do you think it has stopped? It has not.