Evidence considered.
Case dismissed
Case dismissed
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
|
Evidence considered.
Case dismissed
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
<yawn> SS-DD
If you want to think that your godboy was walking around taking a morning dump while reading the Jerusalem Times every morning, go ahead. Your delusions are your own. What you seem to miss is that most of the scholars you keep trumpeting do not accept the miracle-worker that is so precious to shitheads like you. They are continually trying to shrink the story down to something that they personally find 'believable.' And a dead jew coming back to life to atone for the sins of the fucking world does not cut it. For that you need a real theological asshole and they can safely be dismissed. Why is it so important to you? What do you think it proves? Why are you so fucking obsessed? (November 25, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Minimalist Wrote: For that you need a real theological asshole Isn't that what altar boys are for?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Only for catholics.
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 25, 2014 at 2:45 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 2:45 pm by Cyberman.)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
For fuck's sake . . . let's just get on with it: "Jesus' resurrection is historically factual because the Bible says so." And maybe a "why would believers die for a lie?" thrown in for good measure. When all the strutting and posturing is over, this is all he has.
(November 25, 2014 at 2:52 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: For fuck's sake . . . let's just get on with it: "Jesus' resurrection is historically factual because the Bible says so." And maybe a "why would believers die for a lie?" thrown in for good measure. When all the strutting and posturing is over, this is all he has. And when they're asked about all those willing to die for Islam they then claim that THOSE people are deluded . . . ![]()
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (November 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You wouldn't know an ad hominem if it bit you on the ass. Your argument is nonsense and deserves no further thought from myself or anyone else. I'm through picking up the pieces and cleaning your shit off the board. ![]() (with apologies to the Christians whom the above image does not apply to)
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|