MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Free]

[Cyberman]

but by now you've taken this (minor, inoffensive) example of mod action as a threat to your pride,

It's really ridiculous. I've actually made more substantial changes to content whenever I've corrected quote formatting and snipped links. What happened here was the forum equivalent of tidying the toys into one box, or the shit into one pile, and suddenly we're forum gods fucking around with posts?

[His_Majesty]

If your Part Three is anything like your Part Two, Part Three will be merged with this thread. If you don't bring forth new points, you don't get to have a new thread. It's that simple. I will say you'd better tread carefully on this one. You wouldn't want to get banned for spamming.

Look, I am making a CASE for the Resurrection of Jesus. I can care less whether or not anything I say is "new" to you. In fact, in part 2 I presented evidence regarding the Gospel's and the NAMES of the people in the narratives...now, that is ENTIRELY new information that has been only known for the past 10 years or so, and I guarandamntee you didn't know anything about it until I mentioned it (if you even bothered to read the damn thing)...so that is new information.

And then you talk about spamming, one part was about whether or not Jesus existed, and the other part was about the authorship of the Gospels...how the hell is that spamming when both posts are genuinely related to the general topic in question??

So how the hell can that be consider spamming? It can't be, you people just want to have a reason to do some shit, that's all. You see I am having a lively discussion regarding threads that I started, you don't care too much for me, so you had to flex your executive muscles to do some unwarranted crap and I can't even get a good reason why it happen.

You said it was because I didn't bring forth any "new" information, and Esquilax said it was to make the threads more "readable" (whatever the hell that means). So which is it?

It's bullshit.

[abaris]

What happened here was the forum equivalent of tidying the toys into one box, or the shit into one pile...

The second analogy fits the situation at hand better.

[His_Majesty]

It's really ridiculous. I've actually made more substantial changes to content whenever I've corrected quote formatting and snipped links. What happened here was the forum equivalent of tidying the toys into one box, or the shit into one pile, and suddenly we're forum gods fucking around with posts?

Tiding the toys into one box? Bullshit. If that is the case, when you read a book there shouldn't be any chapters & sub-topics...it should just be one long ass book with no chapters or sub-topics whatsoever.

[Esquilax]

[Cyberman]

I couldn't care less what feelings of persecution you may want us to think you have, H_M. This is the only standard that matters on this topic:

2 No Spamming
This not only refers to blatant attempts to advertise but to any post that is not an attempt at discussion. Depending on the severity of the spam, a warning or a ban will be administered. We consider spam to be any of the following:

• Multiple postings of the same topic.
  
• Threads which are posted to advertise products / links unrelated to this forum.
  
• Responses to existing topics which are completely unrelated to the subject.
  
• Hit and run postings of a trollish or otherwise inappropriate nature.
  

But please do keep it up. Our patience is not inexhaustible.

[Esquilax]

It's really ridiculous. I've actually made more substantial changes to content whenever I've corrected quote formatting and snipped links. What happened here was the forum equivalent of tidying the toys into one box, or the shit into one pile, and suddenly we're forum gods fucking around with posts?

Tiding the toys into one box? Bullshit. If that is the case, when you read a book there shouldn't be any chapters & sub-topics...it should just be one long ass book with no chapters or sub-topics whatsoever.

You mean like the kind I write?

And if each chapter came as its own individually bound book that you had to lug everywhere, would that be okay to you too? Or would that seem needless to you?

[His_Majesty]

You could just save us all the time and bother and write your part three here in this thread

I will just let it go, then. Because I refuse to be dicated to.

[Cyberman]

Tiding the toys into one box? Bullshit. If that is the case, when you read a book there shouldn't be any chapters & sub-topics...it should just be one long ass book with no chapters or sub-topics whatsoever.

Try reading one of Terry Pratchett's earlier works sometime. He used to say that life has no chapters, so why should books?

Regardless, this is a discussion forum, not your personal blog. In fact, that's a good idea: why not post your chapters on your own blogspace where you get to set the rules, then come back here and post links?