Reliability of the creation account

[dyresand]

Yet science is not all that hard to comprehend.

In fact, it takes more effort to trick one's mind into believing nonsense written in the bible and viewing an evil sky daddy as good.

funny thing though

1. science - theists reactions to it, "b-but..god isn't in this this wrong he made everything this is impossible without a creator. this is all lies made up by atheists and the world is created by god so is man and evolution is false. ill show them this is wrong i will"

2. biblical science - Atheist and scientists reactions - "this has to be some fucking joke i mean really they want to believe that are they that dumb. okay back to real science now it was great joke."

[robvalue]

The latest adaptation seems to be, by those clever enough to see the need to adapt, that science is right but God made science.

Just pick him up and move him further back down the board, until he runs out of squares.

[dyresand]

The latest adaptation seems to be, by those clever enough to see the need to adapt, that science is right but God made science.

Just pick him up and move him further back down the board, until he runs out of squares.

The one day where science know mostly everything including not if there is a god or not theists will fear the day when such answers come does a god exist or not. theists will use anything in their power even violence to stop that answer getting out. its better to know truth than being feed spoon fulls of bullshit while some one says open up its cheerios.

[robvalue]

Oh, indeed. History is full of examples of religion sabotaging scientific advancement. It's sad to think what we may have lost, and not even known about, to executions of people who dared to think.

If religion had its way, it would drag us back to the dark ages. It hates things like the Internet, because it makes it so much harder to insulate people against other points of view and information.

It is very telling that the standard of religious arguments have not improved in the last 2000 years. They still sound like a child defending their imaginary friend. Really. They are childish arguments, at best coated in deception, word play and red herrings. They just don't see what they sound like, and that they wouldn't use this standard of argument for another topic. Well, I hope not.

If I remember right, the Romans made a law that pi=4.

[dyresand]

Oh, indeed. History is full of examples of religion sabotaging scientific advancement. It's sad to think what we may have lost, and not even known about, to executions of people who dared to think.

If religion had its way, it would drag us back to the dark ages. It hates things like the Internet, because it makes it so much harder to insulate people against other points of view and information.

It is very telling that the standard of religious arguments have not improved in the last 2000 years. They still sound like a child defending their imaginary friend. Really. They are childish arguments, at best coated in deception, word play and red herrings. They just don't see what they sound like, and that they wouldn't use this standard of argument for another topic. Well, I hope not.

If I remember right, the Romans made a law that pi=4.

speaking of which a theist tried to threaten me because i didn't believe. he is like your luck i'm not the president i will all the atheists and i would specifically kill you and the dark ages were a god send to show people god exists. well my reply to him was you are crazy enough to say that the dark ages were a god send when it was the polar opposite to many people died for just think and the fact that you are saying you will kill all us atheists because we don't believe in a god that's lunacy and well your going to loose allies and not to mention that is barbaric and going against human rights and also just plain fucking wrong.

[comet]

I don't understand stand why they just don't do "yeah, we thought that 2K years ago, now we think different". They hurt their own case.

[dyresand]

I don't understand stand why they just don't do "yeah, we thought that 2K years ago, now we think different". They hurt their own case.

they won't the ignorance is to strong with them.

[abaris]

I don't understand stand why they just don't do "yeah, we thought that 2K years ago, now we think different". They hurt their own case.

Most of all because people are still afraid of hell when they don't buy every helping of shitballs served on the bible platter.

And because there are still shitstains out there making good money by coning the gullible, or because there's a power waiting for those who can convince their sheeple best.

[dyresand]

I don't understand stand why they just don't do "yeah, we thought that 2K years ago, now we think different". They hurt their own case.

Most of all because people are still afraid of hell when they don't buy every helping of shitballs served on the bible platter.

And because there are still shitstains out there making good money by coning the gullible, or because there's a power waiting for those who can convince their sheeple best.

i agree with the hell and control part after that when he talks about god no because there is no god in my world view.

[Guesto123]

But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed. AND DO NOT FEAR THEIR INTIMIDATION, AND DO NOT BE TROUBLED, 15but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; and keep a good conscience so that in the thing in which you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ will be put to shame.