RE: On Unbelief III. Deconstructing Arguments From Design
December 24, 2014 at 5:20 pm
(This post was last modified: December 24, 2014 at 5:21 pm by dyresand.)
(December 24, 2014 at 5:16 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Well, I wouldn't necessarily argue that what we perceive as flaws would completely rule out the possibility that some intelligent agent had purposes for including them, or that the design is simply imperfect, though in many ways exceedingly complex and "brilliant."
My argument grants that there are signs of design and order, but not such that implies agency.
The one problem all creatures have on this planet we breath and eat from the same mouth. Except any animal that has gills.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>