Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 11:30 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Your opinion on the following statement:

Poll: "Coming to be is for the sake of being, not being for the sake of coming to be."
This poll is closed.
I completely agree.
19.05%
 4 19.05%
I sort of agree.
9.52%
 2 9.52%
*shrugs*
66.67%
 14 66.67%
I sort of disagree.
0%
 0 0%
I completely disagree.
4.76%
 1 4.76%
Total 21 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Your opinion on the following statement:
Jackalope Offline
Completely out of fucks
*******
Religious Views: Absent
Posts: 30587
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation: 141
#11
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:04 am
(January 12, 2015 at 11:55 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: The rest of the quote I have goes:

"Hence Empedocles was wrong in saying that many attributes belong to animals because it happened so in their coming to be, for instance that their backbone is such because it happened to get broken by bending."

:-|


Wut.
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 91
#12
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:07 am (This post was last modified: January 13, 2015 at 1:08 am by Alex K.)
@Cthulhu

I tawt he tawt that empedocles tawt that the vertebrae were created in a lamarckian fashion because a rigid backbone would have been broken again and again.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply
Mudhammam Offline
Disciple of Nature
****
Religious Views: anti-theist (towards 98.5% of deities)
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation: 60
#13
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:08 am
(January 13, 2015 at 1:02 am)Alex K Wrote:
(January 12, 2015 at 11:55 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: The rest of the quote I have goes:

"Hence Empedocles was wrong in saying that many attributes belong to animals because it happened so in their coming to be, for instance that their backbone is such because it happened to get broken by bending."

:-|

Well this makes it more concrete, so it is very useful context to make *any sense* of the first statement. What we can say for sure is that, indeed, empedocles was wrong here concerning.the details, but more correct than aristoteles: animals are indeed the way they are because "it" (natural selection) happened so in their coming to be. However, I get the feeling that precise meanings of words matter here...
Indeed the translators/commentators in "The Presocratic Philosophers" add: "We may rather praise [Empedocles] as the first thinker to see that biology needs both randomness and principles of organization in its exploratory equipment."
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 91
#14
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:09 am
@Pickup

I'm so shmart Big Grin
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply
Mudhammam Offline
Disciple of Nature
****
Religious Views: anti-theist (towards 98.5% of deities)
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation: 60
#15
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:14 am
Empedocles was an evolutionist who believed, in the words of Aristotle, that creatures "sprang up many faces without necks, arms wandered without shoulders, unattached, and eyes strayed alone, in need of foreheads," but "Wherever, then, everything turned out as it would have it were happening for a purpose, there the creatures survived, being accidentally compounded in a suitable way; but where this did not happen, the creatures perished and are perishing still.."
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Find
Reply
SteelCurtain Offline
Milk Chocolate Bimbo/Swag Master
*****
Religious Views: Atheist (6)
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation: 117
#16
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:24 am
Lol. Not gonna lie. I had/have no clue what the OP meant at all.

But my first instinct was to be like, "Yeah. Solid. Aristotle's a pimp."
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 91
#17
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:33 am (This post was last modified: January 13, 2015 at 1:33 am by Alex K.)
[Image: australopithecus_.jpg]

Definitely in need of proper foreheads.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply
Thumpalumpacus Offline
Outside cat
*****
Religious Views: Alive in the Superunknown
Posts: 21811
Threads: 24
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation: 106
#18
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 1:46 am
Fuckin' philosophers.

Find
Reply
Exian Offline
Top Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation: 55
#19
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 2:43 am
(January 12, 2015 at 11:28 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: "Coming to be is for the sake of being, not being for the sake of coming to be." - Aristotle

If he stopped at "Coming to be is for the sake of being", I would just disagree with the notion of intent or design, but then he adds the second part and loses me. Given the scientific tools they had at their disposal, he seems to be making the safe, logical call, so it's funny that he ended up wrong.

And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a false dichotomy?
Find
Reply
robvalue Offline
Chainsaw of logic
*****
Religious Views: Time to wake up
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation: 155
#20
RE: Your opinion on the following statement:
January 13, 2015 at 4:04 am (This post was last modified: January 13, 2015 at 4:05 am by robvalue.)
Sounds like vague gibberish to me. I *shrug*.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Your opinion on the following statement:

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  In your opinion purplepurpose 20 5305 July 9, 2017 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: brewer
  General statement to theists who read this. Brian37 24 3365 April 11, 2017 at 12:44 pm
Last Post: Jeanne
Video The Reasons why "Just Following Jesus" Doesn't work Mental Outlaw 1346 248982 July 2, 2016 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  AF friends, an opinion on Bible debate, please drfuzzy 25 5389 October 1, 2015 at 10:50 am
Last Post: houseofcantor
  What is your Opinion on Having Required Classes in Logic in Schools? Salacious B. Crumb 43 9153 August 4, 2015 at 12:01 am
Last Post: BitchinHitchins
  Opinion on this Creed Kingpin 80 15563 July 25, 2015 at 5:41 am
Last Post: pocaracas
  Going to a Roman Catholic school and expressing my opinion. piterski123 7 3360 April 28, 2015 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Iroscato
  How to deal with opposite opinion marianomanto 8 4018 August 25, 2014 at 8:28 am
Last Post: Esquilax
Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Mudhammam 29 5438 August 22, 2014 at 9:50 pm
Last Post: Goosebump
  In my opinion most important Hitchens debate tor 0 1404 March 24, 2014 at 3:13 am
Last Post: tor



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)