Robert Spencer's Non-Scholarly Tricks Revealed
January 14, 2015 at 6:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 14, 2015 at 6:43 pm by Rayaan.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 1:36 am
Thread Rating:
|
Robert Spencer's Non-Scholarly Tricks Revealed
|
|
Ignores the fact that Spencer is citing other scholars, primarily German and it was the Germans who first used historical criticism to dismantle xtianity for the pile of crap it is, Rayaan.
I get that muslims prefer to be comfortable with their fairy tales just as xtians prefer their own fairy tales. So I will ask you, where is the evidence that it happened the way the koran claims? P.S. - the koran cannot be used to prove itself....in case you were thinking of wandering down that road.
Not to mention the whole movement around the offspring of Mohammad. What about Zaid ibn Ali ibn Hussain? Did he not rise against the government. Is that made up history...did people not rally around Ahlebayt or did Ahlebayt totally make up their lineage to Mohammad?
Who knows, I take all history with a grain of salt.
(January 14, 2015 at 10:56 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Not to mention the whole movement around the offspring of Mohammad. What about Zaid ibn Ali ibn Hussain? Did he not rise against the government. Is that made up history...did people not rally around Ahlebayt or did Ahlebayt totally make up their lineage to Mohammad? Yeah...and a family was cobbled together for jesus, too. How long is it going to take before you realize it is all the same stuff? The implication of the video in the other thread is that the Arab empire created islam. Islam did not inspire the conquest of the empire. I'm sure you won't watch it.
Therefor all the supernatural stuff actually did happen? Cool.
I don't think it matters if Muhammed existed or not. I personally think he did. I also think he was full of shit, and that the world would be a better place had he never been born.
Why were all the people worth worshipping born so long ago?
(January 15, 2015 at 4:47 am)robvalue Wrote: Why were all the people worth worshipping born so long ago? Winston Churchill was born in the 19th century, there's that. (January 15, 2015 at 4:51 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:(January 15, 2015 at 4:47 am)robvalue Wrote: Why were all the people worth worshipping born so long ago? Winston "let the starving miners eat grass because they're no better than cows" and "machine gun them down" Churchil? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


