Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:11 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2015 at 12:12 am by Drich.)
(January 16, 2015 at 12:57 pm)Exian Wrote: Dammit! Late to the party again.
Let me get this straight: SoulMan fucked MonkeyMan and they had Soul children? So souls are genetic? Different species can mate and produce fertile offspring?
This is fucking weak man. How the fuck can anyone believe that humans once lived forever?
Genesis 5:3 says Adam contribution to the reproductive process was to pass on a soul. As Seth did not receive a soul as Adam did in gen 2.
(January 16, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Tonus Wrote: (January 16, 2015 at 10:02 am)Drich Wrote: Indeed! That is why they built a 100 billion dollar hadron super collider. Science needs this one unknown/unknowable particle to exist inorder for their theories to work, so based on the idea/preconception that it exists science is working backwards to make sure all their preconceptions fit. Scientists and researchers can't just make stuff up if they intend to ask for the billions of dollars needed to build something like the LHC. They had to justify the time and expense with a lot more than "if we're wrong, it just means the particle is undetectable except by spiritual outreach. Hang on while we reinterpret our sources." And as was already pointed out, had their theories been proven wrong, they would scrap them and work with the facts at hand instead of insisting that it had to exist because the sacred Gospel of Higgs said so.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:14 am
(January 17, 2015 at 12:11 am)Drich Wrote: (January 16, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Tonus Wrote: Scientists and researchers can't just make stuff up if they intend to ask for the billions of dollars needed to build something like the LHC. They had to justify the time and expense with a lot more than "if we're wrong, it just means the particle is undetectable except by spiritual outreach. Hang on while we reinterpret our sources." And as was already pointed out, had their theories been proven wrong, they would scrap them and work with the facts at hand instead of insisting that it had to exist because the sacred Gospel of Higgs said so.
Have you mistaken mockery for a rebuttal again, or are you just being a collossal, dishonest asshat?
Is there even a difference, with you? 
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:19 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2015 at 12:21 am by Drich.)
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:24 am
It would seem some have forgotten the "bible rules".
- The bible is a literal account of the creation.
- If there is a disagreement, then the bible is symbolic.
- If there is a contradiction, then it was not interpreted correctly.
- If it makes no sense, then it is the "Mystery of god" and "mortal man cannot comprehend the mind of god.".
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 35414
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:24 am
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:27 am
(January 16, 2015 at 11:35 pm)goodwithoutgod Wrote: (January 16, 2015 at 11:14 pm)Drich Wrote: I'm saying God durning the 7 days of creation made man/Adam (man made in his image.) placed him in the garden just like the bible says.
'Monkey man' evolved outside the garden just like you believe.
interesting, and this "man", that "god" created...I presume you think that is our ancestor, so then why would we have vestigial bone formations and organs within our bodies that are evidence of our fishlike ancestors?
Did "adam" have a fishlike tail? A purpose for his appendix? Why is our circulatory system look just like a fish in our early gestational stages? Why are our testicles up in our chest cavity, then drop down through a defect hole in our torso to dangle below our body, creating a imperfect design of high probability for the development of hernias? oh the questions....they burn..did adam have nipples? why? since he was created first..what purpose could they have had?
Speaking of evolution; The extreme detour of the recurrent laryngeal nerves, about 4.6 metres (15 ft) in the case of giraffes, is cited as evidence of evolution. The nerve's route would have been direct in the fish-like ancestors of modern tetrapods, traveling from the brain, past the heart, to the gills (as it does in modern fish). Over the course of evolution, as the neck extended and the heart became lower in the body, the laryngeal nerve was caught on the wrong side of the heart. Natural selection gradually lengthened the nerve by tiny increments to accommodate, resulting in the circuitous route now observed.
think...evolve
![[Image: Facepalm-GIFS-1.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=gifsec.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FGIF%2F2014%2F03%2FFacepalm-GIFS-1.gif)
Did you not read the op noob?
Generally how forums work are as follows: one must at least read the op before commenting. If you read the op you would have no doubt read the part that evolved man and the sons of Adam co-mingled after the fall meaning man with soul had children with soulless the monkey people you demand to be decended from.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:28 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2015 at 12:29 am by dyresand.)
This guy explains why creationism and the genesis account is bullshit.
Also he has a ton more this is just scratching the surface.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:30 am
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:30 am
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 12:32 am
(January 17, 2015 at 12:00 am)dyresand Wrote: 7th day of creation was on a day of rest Dirch.. and its in your bible and i know this and you should because on the 7th day what did god do?
What are you talking about ?
|
