Blasphemy

[robvalue]

Until this thread, I had never really thought about the fact that rainbows would have had to have formed before the flood. I guess I was distracted by the fact that Christians believe genocide is considered a cute story for kids.

Genocide doesn't even seem a strong enough word.

"Downsizing" sounds a bit generous too.

What word could describe utter annihilation of virtually every living creature... And to make it worse, the creatures which are the result of your own incompetency?

Cosmic coverup?

[TubbyTubby]

Still waiting for GC to explain his contradictory position against AiG.

" Well, then, how about the rainbow? Didn’t God specially create the never-before-seen rainbow as a sign of His promise? Not necessarily. InGenesis 9:13, God said, “I do set my bow in the cloud,” and the fact that God does not imply that He had never set a rainbow in the clouds before but only that, from now on, the rainbow—appearing as it so often does as rain is ending—would henceforth have a special significance as a token (reminder 1) of God’s promise to never again send a worldwide Flood."

Was it no pre-flood rain, no pre-flood rainbows or both GC? Come on, enlighten me.

[Godscreated]

Still waiting for GC to explain his contradictory position against AiG.

" Well, then, how about the rainbow? Didn’t God specially create the never-before-seen rainbow as a sign of His promise? Not necessarily. InGenesis 9:13, God said, “I do set my bow in the cloud,” and the fact that God does not imply that He had never set a rainbow in the clouds before but only that, from now on, the rainbow—appearing as it so often does as rain is ending—would henceforth have a special significance as a token (reminder 1) of God’s promise to never again send a worldwide Flood."

Was it no pre-flood rain, no pre-flood rainbows or both GC? Come on, enlighten me.

Who said I have to agree with AIG on everything, you think creationist all agree on every point, not hardly.
Many scientist in the same field do not agree on ideas, sometimes they're so far apart one can't tell if they're even on the same subject. Again the answers there if your smart enough to find it.

[TubbyTubby]

Still waiting for GC to explain his contradictory position against AiG.

" Well, then, how about the rainbow? Didn’t God specially create the never-before-seen rainbow as a sign of His promise? Not necessarily. InGenesis 9:13, God said, “I do set my bow in the cloud,” and the fact that God does not imply that He had never set a rainbow in the clouds before but only that, from now on, the rainbow—appearing as it so often does as rain is ending—would henceforth have a special significance as a token (reminder 1) of God’s promise to never again send a worldwide Flood."

Was it no pre-flood rain, no pre-flood rainbows or both GC? Come on, enlighten me.

Who said I have to agree with AIG on everything, you think creationist all agree on every point, not hardly.
Many scientist in the same field do not agree on ideas, sometimes they're so far apart one can't tell if they're even on the same subject. Again the answers there if your smart enough to find it.

I'm smart enough to interpret it in any number of ways I choose really but that's not what I'm asking. I'm asking you what is your interpretation and why does it differ from AiG (accepted they are no authority). I'm being polite but still you want answer?