Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 11, 2026, 8:28 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
God as a non-empirical being
#21
RE: God as a non-empirical being
"It's nice of you to admit that your god is not involved with reality."

Reply
#22
RE: God as a non-empirical being
(April 18, 2015 at 2:43 am)Pizza Wrote: Another question: How strong an analogy is there between god's mind and a human mind? 
Theists assume so much about what a god's mind would be like without challenge.

Well, if I try and imagine what "God's mind" could be like, I think of a massive chalkboard containing every single event that comprises the "history of the Universe" sprawled out in evolving and increasingly complex mathematical equations that start and end in some definite first principle, or a function like Ψ. Shit, maybe Ψ is God's mind!
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#23
RE: God as a non-empirical being
Maybe god is mathematical equations? Shock
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#24
RE: God as a non-empirical being
What rules everything? Logic. God is logic.

So mathematical equations would be one of the children of God.

That makes me chainsaw of God... I can handle that.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#25
RE: God as a non-empirical being
God is the form of the All! Shock
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#26
RE: God as a non-empirical being
If the category that he's putting God into is "imaginary things" then the argument holds.
Reply
#27
RE: God as a non-empirical being
Nope...our imaginary experiences are just that...experience.  Fraid that god isn;t even imaginary, in that conception, it's a linguistic and mechanical non-entity. Null.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#28
RE: God as a non-empirical being
But I want to be god's chainsaw!
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#29
RE: God as a non-empirical being
(April 18, 2015 at 9:18 am)robvalue Wrote: But I want to be god's chainsaw!

Talk do your dog more often, and then LISTEN.  Eventually, all sincere prayers are granted.
Reply
#30
RE: God as a non-empirical being
(April 17, 2015 at 6:50 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Well, the theist traps himself if he claims God is non-empirical, because he can then no longer make any claims to his nature, nor can he appeal to any sort of reason to believe in him beyond pure faith.

You see, saying God is non-empirical is just a way to avoid presenting proof, because while they're telling you he's non-empirical out of one corner of their mouth, they're telling you that they he watches you masturbate out of the other.

^This ^

Once you claim that a thing is non-empirical, then you must cease to make empirical claims about it.  That god performed a miracle, spoke to someone, made a prophesy, sends people to heaven or hell, came to earth in human form, etc., are all empirical claims.   Simply put, a non-empirical god might satisfy deists, but no one else.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Does the fact that many non-human animals have pituitary disprove Cartesian Dualism? FlatAssembler 36 9102 June 23, 2023 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Metaethics Part 1: Cognitivism/Non-cognitivism Disagreeable 24 5891 February 11, 2022 at 6:46 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 22239 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  A timeless being cannot create mcc1789 125 35285 August 29, 2019 at 1:01 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 28932 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Best response to "You are being too bookish and nerdy!"? FlatAssembler 25 6750 April 5, 2018 at 5:39 pm
Last Post: *Deidre*
  Testimony: Are we being hypocritical? LadyForCamus 86 22798 November 22, 2017 at 11:37 pm
Last Post: Martian Mermaid
  Non-existing objects KerimF 81 38174 June 28, 2017 at 2:34 am
Last Post: KerimF
  A Necessary Being? TheMuslim 155 39964 September 10, 2016 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 35176 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)