Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 2:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
#11
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:04 am)Alex K Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 9:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?

Original sin. Before the fall, our eyes were perfect.

Pulling that out of where the sun don't shine, huh?
Got any reference to back that up?
Reply
#12
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:10 am)pocaracas Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:04 am)Alex K Wrote: Original sin. Before the fall, our eyes were perfect.

Pulling that out of where the sun don't shine, huh?
Got any reference to back that up?

It's implicit. Before the fall, child birth was (nearly) painless (Genesis 3), for instance. We can assume that other, comparably mild, inconveniences, were also part of the package, but weren't explicitly mentioned because it would be obvious that it was punishment for original sin.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#13
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:15 am)Alex K Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:10 am)pocaracas Wrote: Pulling that out of where the sun don't shine, huh?
Got any reference to back that up?

It's implicit. Before the fall, child birth was (nearly) painless (Genesis 3), for instance. We can assume that other, comparably mild, inconveniences, were also part of the package, but weren't explicitly mentioned because it would be obvious that it was punishment for original sin.

I don't remember there being childbirth before that fall... How would anyone know how much it hurt?
Reply
#14
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
You see, when they ate from the tree of knowledge, they received the knowledge that childbirth wouldn't have been painful had they experienced it before the fall.

Woulda' been like spittin' sunflower seeds.
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D

Don't worry, my friend.  If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Reply
#15
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:22 am)pocaracas Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:15 am)Alex K Wrote: It's implicit. Before the fall, child birth was (nearly) painless (Genesis 3), for instance. We can assume that other, comparably mild, inconveniences, were also part of the package, but weren't explicitly mentioned because it would be obvious that it was punishment for original sin.

I don't remember there being childbirth before that fall... How would anyone know how much it hurt?

Genesis 3:

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#16
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:57 am)Pyrrho Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:22 am)pocaracas Wrote: I don't remember there being childbirth before that fall... How would anyone know how much it hurt?

Genesis 3:

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Damn.... I gotta show this to my bossy catholic wife!
Reply
#17
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:04 am)Alex K Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 9:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?

Original sin. Before the fall, our eyes were perfect.

I see you have spent too much time around Christians.

However, that is irrelevant to the original argument.  It is the human eye, as it presently exists, that is supposedly only to be explained by reference to God.

And for the original argument, that the human eye must have had a designer:  in that case, the designer must have been an incompetent buffoon.  If you consider all of the people who need glasses, or who get corrective surgery, one finds that the failure rate for the human eye is near 100%.  That indicates a poor design, and so we have an incompetent designer who designed the eye.  Indeed, humans are capable of making artificial eyes that are, in many respects, superior to a human eye, and so it would seem that humans must be superior to God.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#18
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
I wonder why humans and other creatures evolved to have such a painful and dangerous way to give birth.
Reply
#19
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Seems like poor design, eh Lek?
Reply
#20
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Actually, child birth hardly show much evidence of being painful in most mammals.

Jehovah generally sucked so much all around that only those unfortunately enough to be made in his image could inherit the anatomical deficiencies underlying bad back, lousy knees, and oh, yes, painful child birth.

(April 28, 2015 at 9:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?

Retina of an eagle's eyes suffer from the same shit quality bass ackwards high level design as the human eye.   The wires that send visual image from the retina to the brain crosses in front of the light sensing cells, casting shadows, blocking the retina, and generally reducing visual acuity, rather than crossing behind it as even an 8 year old tinker would known enough to ensure.  

For a more elegant eye, you need to go to the Cephalopods.   Their retinas are actually correctly oriented and wired.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 3865 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Shouldn't there be more Christians with eye patches? BrokenQuill92 33 7881 February 2, 2014 at 9:57 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Tired of xtians prattling on about their "eye-witness" testimony? Minimalist 22 10155 April 27, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Is God’s justice close to an eye for an eye? Greatest I am 14 7869 January 15, 2012 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  God did it! Statistical miracle! 6 double-yolk eggs in a row. (not a miracle, BBC) Anymouse 1 2064 December 10, 2011 at 3:10 am
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)