SATAN!

[chatpilot]

God damn Sae lol that's my girl you really went to town on him too funny. Godschild I just tend to refuse to argue with the wall which in this case represents you.

[Godscreated]

CP the wall of truth is a hard one. I'm not saying that I know all truths that would make me insane like Sae. However Sae did bring out some verses related to Exodus 21:17 and you still have not. Those related verses still refer to adult childern. Sae you should read and study what you write and no I was not being facetious I meant what I said.

[Minimalist]

CP the wall of truth is a hard one.

And a wall of shit is a soft one.


Guess which you are?

[KichigaiNeko]

CP the wall of truth is a hard one. I'm not saying that I know all truths that would make me insane like Sae. However Sae did bring out some verses related to Exodus 21:17 and you still have not. Those related verses still refer to adult childern. Sae you should read and study what you write and no I was not being facetious I meant what I said.

Spoken Like a true xtian with his head firmly planted up his anus and his brain on "Don't think!!"

What has exodus got to do with anything?? You pathetic piece of cosmic excrement!! Grrr

Really you are enough to drive anyone TO Satan! Your stupid book is based on Babylonian myth and your celebrations on pagan agrarian festivals...sheez!! I thought everyone knew that generalisation!

[Violet]

I'm not saying that I know all truths that would make me insane like Sae.

Thanks for the compliment ^_^ And as I've said before: knowing something is true doesn't mean we are right

However Sae did bring out some verses related to Exodus 21:17 and you still have not. Those related verses still refer to adult childern.

Adult children? That sounds almost scarily like an oxymoron (though I acknowledge it can exist depending on definitions) ^_^ I wonder though... from where do we judge "the firstborn son" of a family? The elderly 'grandfather' who was the first son of his father? The first son of the old man? The son of the young couple? Or would rather it mean that every mother's first child would be smitten (as seems most logically true and the least arbitrary), in which case almost the entire male side of the family would die overnight?

Of course those verses refer to "adult children"... nobody here is denying this. However, it does not exclusively refer to "adult children": any 'first-born son' is applicable and was slain by the same God who hardened Pharoh's (otherwise fair) heart with full knowledge that he was going to slay them... that is what the entire captivity and exodus in Egypt was: an example of God's powers. It was him attempting to prove "I can totally fuck you up on the merest of my whims, and fuck up anyone I like, however I like, whenever and wherever I like" to the world in contact with Egypt... and if you will notice in the text the Israelites were less than impressed after hardly any time at all. Not even the 'documented' (in the bible) slaying of all the firstborn sons in Egypt had much of an effect on their cynicism... can you imagine what kind of fucked up shit God did that was not documented (in the bible)?

Sae you should read and study what you write and no I was not being facetious I meant what I said.

I have read it... I have studied it... and I have come to the conclusion that it is a load of hooey. I am willing to challenge that conclusion... but I will hardly change a strongly based opinion on the merest suggestion that I "need to study it better". We give you actual data to work with... you give us but a vague hint to go read the Bible again (as though it will be different this time around...?).

Shame that you weren't being facetious... <insert barbed comment here>.

---

CP the wall of truth is a hard one. I'm not saying that I know all truths that would make me insane like Sae. However Sae did bring out some verses related to Exodus 21:17 and you still have not. Those related verses still refer to adult childern. Sae you should read and study what you write and no I was not being facetious I meant what I said.

Spoken Like a true xtian with his head firmly planted up his anus and his brain on "Don't think!!"

To an extent perhaps... though i feel Westboro wins that one...

What has exodus got to do with anything?? You pathetic piece of cosmic excrement!! Grrr

Exodus has to do with the topics at hand (that being "did God kill young children in Exodus during the passover?"... which is a rather silly question to ask in my opinion, as what does it matter that he killed children young or old or in between? It's still someone's child... perhaps even someone's parent, or sibling, or even more importantly: friend).

He will never answer to merely insulting him (even if it is indeed for a good reason)... so if you intend to really communicate with him at all I'd suggest you chill a bit I don't mean "let him walk all over you and fuck your cat"... but give him something to address at least, lest he leave with the idea that atheists are always angry Imagine what the rocks would feel like if people thought they were always angry Chill! For the rocks!

Really you are enough to drive anyone TO Satan! Your stupid book is based on Babylonian myth and your celebrations on pagan agrarian festivals...sheez!! I thought everyone knew that generalisation!

Actually... if he could drive me to Satan, that would be supposing that Satan could exist to me :S Is this a contrast to driving someone "stark raving mad"?

[chatpilot]

Godschild wrote: "However Sae did bring out some verses related to Exodus 21:17 and you still have not."

The wall of truth? That's a good one! But back to the topic at hand, Sae has more patience than me when it comes to you in particular. I have been down this road a countless number of times with xtians in person as well as online and when I see that no matter how much I prove my point you are going to side step the issue by making up such stupid words as adult children etc. I am wasting my time and energy on you. Your brain has already been rotted to the core and the only one who can free himself from the stranglehold of dogma is you, if and when you ever come to the realization of how insane your defense of the bible narrative and god in particular sound to the rational mind.

When the Hebrews marched against the Midianites these were the marching orders they were given by Moses under the commandment of God.
Numbers 31:9,15-18
9.And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods.
15.And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16.Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.
17.Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18.But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

You don't need to reinterpret this one Godschild, I believe in verse 17 that little ones means just that.

[fr0d0]

The answer to this question is quite simple to me. Accusations of Gods injustice and therefore 'evil nature' are misplaced, because God is consistently 'just' as presented in the bible, otherwise how could you assert him to be so, as the Jews and Christians do? Do you think they wrote this to deliberately disprove itself and them?

God never murders, or condones murder... God can only ever take life justly. That's what every reference in the bible follows.

[Violet]

The answer to this question is quite simple to me. Accusations of Gods injustice and therefore 'evil nature' are misplaced, because God is consistently 'just' as presented in the bible, otherwise how could you assert him to be so, as the Jews and Christians do? Do you think they wrote this to deliberately disprove itself and them?

God never murders, or condones murder... God can only ever take life justly. That's what every reference in the bible follows.

Well it's not so simple to some of us, fr0d0!

Maybe you're just smarter, more insane, or have been raped more times by bananas than the lot of us 'normal' folk?

[fr0d0]

(How would I know about the banana thing??)

[Autumnlicious]

Maybe you're just smarter, more insane, or have been raped more times by bananas than the lot of us 'normal' folk?

There is no banana rapage. Repeat that after me....