I don't care about bible contradictions.

[TubbyTubby]

Ah I see, never heard that one before. Drich is so clever and so very christian. I must try harder.

Did you even read the comments you left that inspired the use of that word? If you don't like being pushed back, don't push. otherwise suck it up cry baby.

I don't give a fuck what you call me to be honest. Insults from a deluded mind don't concern me greatly.

[Drich]

which is why I called you on your thinly veiled attempt of manipulation. If my word really matter that much to you, then so should the words you use to address me.

[CapnAwesome]

You've got the cart before the horse.   I can't rely on the Bible to arbitrate between people who claim to know god, because the Bible itself is a set of reports by a variety of authors of what they think god said.  They don't always agree with each other.  The Koran is another report of what a man thinks god says.  The Book of Mormon is yet another.  There is a vast body of Hindu scripture too, and on and on.  ALL of these authors claimed to have known god and reported back.  And they all contradict each other.  There is nothing to distinguish one as more likely to be true than the other.

Actually, the other two books written were not ever claimed to be directly from God. They were written from what had been communicated from "angels."
The problem there is both sides have them. The 'prophets' who wrote said books simply assumed the angels were from God. Either your intentionally confusing the issue (or trying to by claiming a single source) or you don't know what it is you are talking about.

I love the guy who believes that false angels came down to deceive prophets is going to tell anyone that they don't know what they are talking about.