Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 30, 2024, 2:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:15 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I don't really care where you start...it only matters where you finish.

Well, if we start at "very doubtful", then you have quite a task to get us up to "somewhat certain".


(July 22, 2015 at 7:15 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: If you have any historical evidence that would refute any of my five facts and that has been overlooked by the thousands of professional NT scholars teaching at major universities throughout the Western world who accept them, would you mind sharing it with us?

Are you talking about me being "somewhat certain that a man named Jesus historically existed around 2,000 years ago" or me being "somewhat certain that a man named Jesus did a whole bunch of magic 2,000 years ago"?

Because those aren't equivalent statements, and no one has brought up any evidence to make that second one budge much higher than "quite doubtful". If you're talking about the first one, then yeah, you can get that up to or even above "uncertain", but that's also not a really impressive or meaningful claim.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 23, 2015 at 12:38 am)IATIA Wrote: Indoor plumbing.

Public shithouses with social interaction.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
So the Romans invented the internet?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 23, 2015 at 12:13 pm)Stimbo Wrote: So the Romans invented the internet?

I didn't know Al Gore was Roman.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Quote:You have evidence that a guy, let's call him Jesus, lived somewhat 2000 years ago, went against some part of the established religious leadership and got nailed.

No, he doesn't.  He has a claim - contained in a single absurd old book - which is not evidence of anything except the author being a shithead or a con man.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 23, 2015 at 12:18 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:You have evidence that a guy, let's call him Jesus, lived somewhat 2000 years ago, went against some part of the established religious leadership and got nailed.

No, he doesn't.  He has a claim - contained in a single absurd old book - which is not evidence of anything except the author being a shithead or a con man.

There are more similar stories from this time period, such as the Teacher of Righteousness, hinting that maybe there's some truth to the underlying story...
Although, the story of the underdog that goes through a transformation and becomes the main man is common enough in fiction and resonates well enough with the common folk to have been through several reincarnations, in writing, in theater, in cinema, on tv... hinting at a fictitious origin to any such story.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
There is Apollonius of Tyana, too.  Same shit as jesus.  Legends spread.  In a fish story the fish always gets bigger.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Bigger fish, you say?
http://darthsanddroids.net/episodes/0033.html

The originator of:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Ma...BiggerFish
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Big Grin

Yep.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
[Image: 11745357_883313301755530_829462487257997...e=560E5FA2]
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3374 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 8788 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 18745 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17176 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13134 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 40750 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 28307 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 19847 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 371529 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7655 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)