Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 9:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 7:38 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: So basically, the only substance Randy has to offer to this thread is *word salad*

Pretty tepid, EG. Pretty tepid. [Image: wink.gif]
Reply
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 7:45 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 7:38 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: So basically, the only substance Randy has to offer to this thread is *word salad*

Pretty tepid, EG. Pretty tepid. [Image: wink.gif]

You didn't add any substance to the argument whatsoever except to continue to repeat the same talking points over again. You failed to address my arguments in any fashion.

As far as I'm concerned your proofs are completely invalid and with no reasonable argument I have no choice but to settle with that conclusion.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Even though I pretty much disagree with everything Randy types, you have to give him credit for trying.

It's a lot better than, "It happened because the bible said it happened. The Bible is the word of god, because the Bible says it is!"

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Quote:Oh, and the fact that some people were around when Jesus, James, John, Peter and Paul were actually alive...people who wrote stuff down.


Liar.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm)Easy Guns Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 7:45 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Pretty tepid, EG. Pretty tepid. [Image: wink.gif]

You didn't add any substance to the argument whatsoever except to continue to repeat the same talking points over again. You failed to address my arguments in any fashion.

As far as I'm concerned your proofs are completely invalid and with no reasonable argument I have no choice but to settle with that conclusion.

Jesus Mythers are idiots, and both theists and atheists alike know this.

Now that we have that out of the way...

If you have any opposing arguments you wish to make regarding any of the material I have presented, please make your case in response to the appropriate post(s):

Post 1 - My OP
Post 65 - Fact 1: Jesus died by crucifixion
Post 148 - Fact 2: Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them
Post 283 - Fact 3: Paul, the enemy of the Church, was suddenly converted
Post 460 - Fact 4: James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly converted.
Coming Soon - Fact 5: Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Thanks.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:44 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: You didn't add any substance to the argument whatsoever except to continue to repeat the same talking points over again. You failed to address my arguments in any fashion.

As far as I'm concerned your proofs are completely invalid and with no reasonable argument I have no choice but to settle with that conclusion.

Jesus Mythers are idiots, and both theists and atheists alike know this.

Now that we have that out of the way...

If you have any opposing arguments you wish to make regarding any of the material I have presented, please make your case in response to the appropriate post(s):

Post 1 - My OP
Post 65 - Fact 1: Jesus died by crucifixion
Post 148 - Fact 2: Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them
Post 283 - Fact 3: Paul, the enemy of the Church, was suddenly converted
Post 460 - Fact 4: James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly converted.
Coming Soon - Fact 5: Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Thanks.

Some interesting stuff I had never thought of before, Randy. Thanks! Shy
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: Even though I pretty much disagree with everything Randy types, you have to give him credit for trying.

It's a lot better than, "It happened because the bible said it happened.  The Bible is the word of god, because the Bible says it is!"

(July 9, 2015 at 8:47 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Some interesting stuff I had never thought of before, Randy. Thanks! Shy

[Image: ani_tiphat.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: As far as I'm concerned your proofs are completely invalid and with no reasonable argument I have no choice but to settle with that conclusion.

Why?

I've quoted all sorts of non-biblical sources in support of my four facts, so far. And I've offered some guidance as to why they matter.

You've quoted NO ONE and offered no evidence. Just opinions and assertions...along with the usual atheist hubris and ill-will (which is to be expected, of course).

Why should anyone believe that the minimal facts are not valid based on the arguments and evidence that you have presented thus far? [Image: shrug.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:44 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Post 65 - Fact 1: Jesus died by crucifixion

You have yet to prove that jesus died and not just gone comatose so, not a fact.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 8:59 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 8:44 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Post 65 - Fact 1: Jesus died by crucifixion

You have yet to prove that jesus died and not just gone comatose so, not a fact.

I covered this in post #388 - repeated (and expanded) here for your convenience:

In 1835, David Strauss definitively refuted the Swoon Theory, and it has never been taken seriously since. Strauss argued that if a half-dead Jesus, beaten and bloody from head to toe, managed to stagger back to where the apostles were in hiding, he would not have inspired his disciples to proclaim that He was GOD - the Lord of Life - who had triumphed over the grave. After suffering all of the abuse, with all the catastrophic blood loss and trauma, he would have looked so pitiful that the disciples would never have hailed him as the victorious conqueror of death; they would have felt sorry for him and tried to nurse him back to health.

Do you honestly think that upon seeing him in this horrible condition the Apostles would have called Him, "Lord"? Or would they have called him a doctor?

So, it's preposterous to think that if Jesus had appeared to them in that condition, his disciples would have been prompted to start a world-wide movement based on the hope that someday they, too, would have a resurrection body just like his. [Image: no.gif]

Here are nine pieces of evidence that refute the swoon theory:

  1. Jesus could not have survived crucifixion. Roman procedures were very careful to eliminate that possibility. Roman law even laid the death penalty on any soldier who let a capital prisoner escape in any way, including bungling a crucifixion. It was never done.
  2. The fact that the Roman soldier did not break Jesus' legs, as he did to the other two crucified criminals (Jn 19:31-33), means that the soldier was sure Jesus was dead. Breaking the legs hastened the death so that the corpse could be taken down before the sabbath (v. 31).
    John, an eyewitness, certified that he saw blood and water come from Jesus' pierced heart (Jn 19:34-35). This shows that Jesus' lungs had collapsed and he had died of asphyxiation. Any medical expert can vouch for this.
  3. The body was totally encased in winding sheets and entombed (Jn 19:38-42).
  4. The post-resurrection appearances convinced the disciples, even "doubting Thomas," that Jesus was gloriously alive (Jn 20:19-29). It is psychologically impossible for the disciples to have been so transformed and confident if Jesus had merely struggled out of a swoon, badly in need of a doctor. A half-dead, staggering sick man who has just had a narrow escape is not worshiped fearlessly as divine lord and conquerer of death.
  5. How were the Roman guards at the tomb overpowered by a swooning corpse? Or by unarmed disciples? And if the disciples did it, they knowingly lied when they wrote the Gospels, and we are into the conspiracy theory, which we will refute shortly.
  6. How could a swooning half-dead man have moved the great stone at the door of the tomb? Who moved the stone if not an angel? No one has ever answered that question. Neither the Jews nor the Romans would move it, for it was in both their interests to keep the tomb sealed: the Jews had the stone put there in the first place, and the Roman guards would be killed if they let the body "escape." The story the Jewish authorities spread, that the guards fell asleep and the disciples stole the body (Mt 28:11-15), is unbelievable. Roman guards would not fall asleep on a job like that; if they did, they would lose their lives. And even if they did fall asleep, the crowd and the effort and the noise it would have taken to move an enormous boulder would have wakened them. Furthermore, we are again into the conspiracy theory, with all its unanswerable difficulties (we'll deal with this theory in a couple days.)
  7. If Jesus awoke from a swoon, where did he go? Think this through: you have a living body to deal with now, not a dead one. Why did it disappear? There is absolutely no data, not even any false, fantastic, imagined data, about Jesus' life after his crucifixion, in any sources, friend or foe, at any time, early or late. A man like that, with a past like that, would have left traces.
  8. Most simply, the swoon theory necessarily turns into the conspiracy theory or the hallucination theory, for the disciples testified that Jesus did not swoon but really died and really rose.

Hope this helps. [Image: ani_tiphat.gif]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3583 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9422 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20879 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17902 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13411 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 42144 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 29880 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 20825 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 389974 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7873 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)