Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 12, 2016 at 8:29 pm
(April 12, 2016 at 2:48 pm)Divinity Wrote: (March 31, 2016 at 8:28 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:
My youngest daughter recently asked me: "If something created the Universe, why would it have to be God?"
Magic Universe Creating Pixies is just as good of an explanation.
Vera causa* - The principle holds that explaining a particular effect or event requires the sufficiency to produce the phenomenon in question.
* “A fairy godmother may be assigned in story as the cause of certain marvelous effects, but is not a
vera causa." http://www.seadict.com/en/en/vera%20causa
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 13, 2016 at 11:42 am
What a load of cobblers.
There are different categories of made up bullshit now?
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 13, 2016 at 8:31 pm
(April 12, 2016 at 8:29 pm)snowtracks Wrote: Vera causa* - The principle holds that explaining a particular effect or event requires the sufficiency to produce the phenomenon in question.
* “A fairy godmother may be assigned in story as the cause of certain marvelous effects, but is not a vera causa." http://www.seadict.com/en/en/vera%20causa
What is the difference between a god and a Faerie Godmother?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 8709
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 14, 2016 at 8:05 am
A fairie is not that which the greater than which cannot be conceived.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 14, 2016 at 9:28 am
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2016 at 11:44 am by robvalue.)
"Can be conceived of" is rather subjective.
If it can be described at all, it's usually pretty easy to conceive of something greater. I certainly have no trouble.
Or a crappy god could just make followers who can't conceive of anything greater than it. Same difference.
Posts: 16495
Threads: 460
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 14, 2016 at 1:40 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2016 at 1:40 pm by Fake Messiah.)
What would I consider to be evidence for God? Well it depends on what God, doesn't it? If there was suddenly a video recording of a giant creature rising from the sea with male torso holding a trident in his hands and fish lower body I wouldn't think it was evidence for God Adoni, now wouldn't I? Or evidence for monkey-god Hanuman would I guess be a sudden appearance of giant banana in the sky and perhaps rain of coconuts - or is it too racist toward monkeys?
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
