Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 17, 2025, 7:05 pm
Thread Rating:
Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
|
(June 27, 2015 at 9:08 pm)KUSA Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 7:04 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Maximal Fact #1: It didn't happen. I was and I can verify its lack of happening.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Being in locus is actually a pretty ridiculous requirement for determining whether something happened or happens. No human being in history has ever been inside a star, yet we can state without fear of serious contradiction what goes on.
Similarly, I don't need to have been present in 1st century Palestine to judge the Resurrection as non-historical. Given the number of other mythological resurrections we reject out of hand coupled with the fact that no human body that has started the decay process ('by this time he stinketh') has ever been observed to have returned to life, it is more reasonable to reject the bodily resurrection of Jesus than it is to accept it. And it isn't much good invoking miracles - the divinity of Jesus depends largely on the miracle of the resurrection, and Jesus resurrected because he was divine. Circular arguments - by definition - get you nowhere. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 27, 2015 at 11:11 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2015 at 11:12 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(June 27, 2015 at 10:56 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Similarly, I don't need to have been present in 1st century Palestine to judge the Resurrection as non-historical. Given the number of other mythological resurrections we reject out of hand coupled with the fact that no human body that has started the decay process ('by this time he stinketh') has ever been observed to have returned to life, it is more reasonable to reject the bodily resurrection of Jesus than it is to accept it.*emphasis mine* I guess you missed the part in the bible where prophecy concerning the resurrection of the messiah explicitly state that his body would be raised up before it started to decay. "For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption." - Psalm 16:10
Considering that the average body's organs start to decay within a 24-72 hour period and begins to bloat within 3 days while keeping in mind that the condition of a body that was beaten and crucified isn't exactly average to begin with.... yeah. Pretty sure there was some decay going on. Twit.
(June 27, 2015 at 11:11 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 10:56 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Similarly, I don't need to have been present in 1st century Palestine to judge the Resurrection as non-historical. Given the number of other mythological resurrections we reject out of hand coupled with the fact that no human body that has started the decay process ('by this time he stinketh') has ever been observed to have returned to life, it is more reasonable to reject the bodily resurrection of Jesus than it is to accept it.*emphasis mine* Then either Psalm 16:10 is wrong (and therefore not a prophecy) or Jesus was not the messiah, since (as SD pointed out) a body dead for three days is going to be at least partly decayed. So, which way will you have it: Is the Psalm wrong, or are the NT accounts in Mark and Matthew both wrong? Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
But what if the body was sealed off in a glass coffin and covered in wax?
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue (June 27, 2015 at 11:23 pm)Starvald Demelain Wrote: Considering that the average body's organs start to decay within a 24-72 hour period and begins to bloat within 3 days while keeping in mind that the condition of a body that was beaten and crucified isn't exactly average to begin with.... yeah. Pretty sure there was some decay going on. Twit. You do realize that Jesus rose on the morning of the third day, so that falls well within your 24-72 hour period.... |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)