LISTEN, CHRISTIANS!

[Thumpalumpacus]

Remove the law from society and access to basic needs, and watch people kill each other in the streets over a scrap of food.

Speak for yourself, punk. I don't need laws, or books, or gods, to tell me the right thing to do.

Typical of a religious nut to make a claim then fail miserably to provide proof when asked. You are so predictable.

Really? Religious people don't have a monopoly on that one, or did you forget all the people claiming I was dishonest / lying, and after being asked for just one example, failed to provide any.

As I already pointed out, your latest post is evidence. That is the case here, too.

Everyone here has witnessed your lack of integrity, Hugz m'boy. Everyone here. Some who share your beliefs may avert their eyes at it, and let you slog through the thread alone because they don't want to be associated with your deceit ... but even they have seen it.

You're not fooling anyone but yourself.

[Thumpalumpacus]

<double-post plonked>

[robvalue]

If they made murder, rape and theft legal tomorrow, I would carry on doing those things at the exact same rate I do now. I don't need fairy tales or laws to stop me doing hurtful things. It scares me that some people think their religion is all that is stopping them from being a raging psychopath. At least 9 times out of 10 they would be wrong of course, it's part of the brainwashing to make you think you need it.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

Huggy74

You're a twisted fuck, Huggy, and I can honestly say that I despise you more than any other creationist I've ever interacted with, but I have to give credit where it's due. Your little criminal analogy is just spot on. Your god is just like a criminal with a gun to your head. 

"Love me or burn motherfucker."

Good on you to worship such a steaming pile of dogshit. 

Nah, you burn for the sins you commit and never repent of...

Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. - Revelation 22:14-15

So unless you haven't ever done any of the above, you have no right to complain.

*edit*
Angry Athiest #2 exposed..
^^^^^^^^
Actually "Love me or burn, motherfucker" is a verse in the Bible.

John 15:6  =   https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/John%2015:6

[Rhondazvous]

It might be more accurate to say, "Not everyone here is mad at God."

Some are. Big time.

Check out who's telling others to be accurate. You're really not the right person for the job, Randy. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

Accuracy means hitting the mark. If it weren't for gravity, you probably couldn't hit the ground.

[Longhorn]

Some people here do appear to be very angry at God. Perhaps they are not really atheists because after all:

Randy, Randy, Randy.

You think because I'm fucked up I hold some sort of grudge against something that I don't even have the definition of?

when I say your god is an evil twat, I secretly believe in him? no.
I'm making a moral judgement of a fictional character. Never done that?

Hell, I'm not even angry at your fucking church, or the people who put this shit in my head. I'm not angry at anyone.

[Rhondazvous]

Who's mad at god, Randy?

I name some names, they deny it, I look stupid...

Nah. Not gonna do it.

Just take off your atheist-colored glasses and read the posts without bias. You'll see.

You never let looking stupid stop you from saying anything else. So there must be another reason.

[Bob Kelso]

It might be more accurate to say, "Not everyone here is mad at God."

Some are. Big time.

Check out who's telling others to be accurate. You're really not the right person for the job, Randy. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

Accuracy means hitting the mark. If it weren't for gravity, you probably couldn't hit the ground.

[Rhondazvous]

I don't think this will help. There are some theists (probably a small minority) who's brains are so wired that way, they can't grasp the concept of atheism. They genuinely think we're acting in response to a bad childhood, in denial of judgement or some such thing.

Yeah, it's kind of like when people think I'm an atheist because I'm angry at god because of my disability.  It's actually the opposite - I used to buy into the tripe that others told me.  That my health issues in this life were preparing me for something greater, and all that jazz.  I took comfort in it.  It helped me cope.  I realized I was an atheist because of a dozen and more things not related to my disability in any way that just never added up.

We are kindred spirits. For the last 30 years, my mother has blamed me for not letting god heal me (I'm legally blind and hearing impaired). When I lived in the vicinity of Word of Faith churches, I've had some crazy experiences with people grabbing my head on the street, "Be healed in the name of Jesus. Satan, you take your hands off this child of god. You have no right to hinder her from receiving her blessing."

No it wasn't my disability. It was a confluence of things. And yet my disability did allow me to ask questions others were not asking.

[Napoléon]

Basically, these fools are saying even if they see God personally they still wouldn't accept him.... where's the logic in that?

This proves there is something else behind their "atheism" other than simply "having no belief"

Listen you dense motherfucker. Don't you dare try to speak for me. Yet again you show why you're the biggest prick on this forum with this bullshit misrepresentation.


The question is "IF in the end, you find that God does exist .... will you unconditionally accept Him as your God?"

Bolded the important bit.

If I find out that the god of the bible exists after I die, you can damn well expect me and any other fucker with even a minimal amount of morality to question the actions that are accounted in his book, the bible (and I'm only assuming that because the person who asked the question was christian). Only a slave with no backbone would blindly accept a master so fucked up. That would not be me 'unconditionally accepting him'. If I were to find out he were actually real (which for the record I don't think is going to happen), then that does not automatically mean I would unconditionally accept him as my god.

The morality of the god you believe in is bizarre as far as I'm concerned. You are telling me you would blindly "accept" a god who promotes slavery, sacrifice, genocide and all the other fucked up shit in your little book, yet you have the audacity to call me a fool? You're a fucking chump. A slave if you would unconditionally accept such a maniacal overlord. And fuck you if you would genuinely do so, frankly nutjobs like you make me sick. You are basically admitting you cannot think for yourself. Imbecile.

Also, there is nothing else 'behind my atheism' besides the fact I don't believe in god. What exactly was it that gave you that impression besides my one word answer to a loaded question? Why don't I believe in god? Because the evidence for one is severely lacking. Now the question asked makes me assume for the sake of argument that god is real. I'm obviously going to have other reasons to not 'accept' god if I assume that is the case aren't I? Although you'd obviously say no because your morality is fucked and you blindly accept being a slave. Moron.