Ha, huh because.... Science says so!

[Minimalist]

Did it talk to "Eve," asshole?

No, smarty. That snake and all the other ones after where cursed to crawl on their Bellys... Doi

The fossil is 120 million years old....which pretty much shits on your stupid bible.

[Drich]

Ah, no.

All this story does for me is to poop on those who I've argued in the past who claim snakes never had legs therefore the story of the legged snake in the garden is yet another 'proof' that the Genesis account is false. That's it that's all.

This is just one more piece of a greater puzzle.

I see. Well, I can't account for other people not knowing shit about snakes, and this also doesn't really help your argument that much without the other proofs I mentioned. Otherwise, it's a cheap "I told you so" and basically nothing else.

Again, just a small piece to a greater puzzle. I know 'science' has no issue making grandios claims with a single piece of information from one perspective/point in time and space. (Like how they know a planet's temperature, size, and atmospheric conditions/ability to support life,1500 light years away. by what amounts to electronically listening to frequencies we have no way of verifying that remain constant 1 light year away let along 1499 more. not to mention how this frequency is affected by time) no, we in The religious community are not required to have so much faith. God typically provides us with lots of small evidences protracted over time to help us build a solid understanding and unshakable beliefs.  

This my pink friend is just one small piece to a much larger puzzle.

[Drich]

The creature’s limbs were probably not used for locomotion, the researchers say, but rather for grasping prey, or perhaps for holding on to mating partners.

Was the serpent in the bible walking around?

You do know what the word "Probably" means right?

[Drich]

[Drich]

[SteelCurtain]

To translate from Drich speak, "I pulled some shit out of my ass in order to make the two stories reconcile sort of."

[Faith No More]

You do know what the word "Probably" means right?

Of course, numbnuts. I'll assume since you chose to deflect that the answer was "yes." Unfortunately for you, even with "probably" there in that sentence, it still means science has not concluded that these legs were used to walk, so for you to claim these findings prove the bible was right is premature.

[Minimalist]

Drippy, there is nothing you post worth reading once...let alone twice.

[Drich]

You do know what the word "Probably" means right?

Of course, numbnuts.  I'll assume since you chose to deflect that the answer was "yes."  Unfortunately for you, even with "probably" there in that sentence, it still means science has not concluded that these legs were used to walk, so for you to claim these findings prove the bible was right is premature.

You assume too much sport.
Read Genesis 3. It did not say the snake walk on his legs. It said the snake was cursed to crawl on its belly and eat dust.

The snakes legs could have helped augment his local motion through brush and trees. Which would keep him far from the type of life lived eating dust by being forced to spend most of the day on the ground

[Drich]

To translate from Drich speak, "I pulled some shit out of my ass in order to make the two stories reconcile sort of."

To translate steel curtain speak, "you've got me beat, and I can respond topically, so I will just be little your efforts with a red herring in hopes of distracting you from your topic.

Sorey, stealcurtain but nice try.