Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 4:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 7:00 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(August 14, 2015 at 2:14 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Wait, wait, wait, wait... people won't die for a lie or delusion?  Care to explain Jihad, then?

Kevin-

You're either not paying attention or not thinking or both.

It has been said by me and others MANY times that people die for their belief all the time.

What is not common is for people to lay down their lives for what they know to be a lie.

If the apostles made up the story of Jesus' resurrection, then they KNEW is was a lie. No one dies for what they know are lies.

Except that the apostles' deaths are mostly shrouded in mystery, AFAIK.  Judas hung himself/committed suicide due to his betrayal.  Beyond that, it is believed that Peter, Paul, and James were martyred (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostle_(C...e_Apostles).  And there's nothing about the others.

Indeed, your favorite quote mined source, Ehrman, talks about this on his blog (behind a pay wall: http://ehrmanblog.org/were-the-disciples...urrection/), dismissing your line of reasoning as a standard, and flawed, line of apologist reasoning.  "They wouldn't die for a lie" assumes that they were captured, tortured, and then put to death, or faced that as a punishment.  Yet, there's no evidence that the bulk of apostles died like that.  

And, indeed, people do risk themselves for a lie if it's a way to maintain/increase power.  Never forget that religion and politics were the same thing back then.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 8:26 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Except that the apostles' deaths are mostly shrouded in mystery, AFAIK.

Oh, give it a rest. To be dead one has to be alive before. Not even that is proven.

Randy likes to pull what he calls facts out of brother anus. So the whole OP is the expected product of it's source.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 8:50 pm)abaris Wrote:
(August 14, 2015 at 8:26 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Except that the apostles' deaths are mostly shrouded in mystery, AFAIK.

Oh, give it a rest. To be dead one has to be alive before. Not even that is proven.

Randy likes to pull what he calls facts out of brother anus. So the whole OP is the expected product of it's source.

Oh, I know that.  The thing is, I have no problem allowing that these people actually existed because it doesn't help his argument at all.  The biggest flaw with his approach is that he's essentially saying:

If all these other things are true, then it's likely this last thing is true.

Except, those other things aren't really related to that last thing (what do people's changed outlooks have to do with someone coming back to life?  if their outlooks even changed at all (where's the proof?)?), and they're also subjected to different standards of supporting evidence needed to make the claims plausible, let alone likely.  

A local cult leader who constantly ran afoul of the local authorities, got betrayed by one of his own, and was killed via crucifixion is a much more mundane claim than the guy was actually the son of god and was resurrected on the third day after his death.  And what sparse evidence points to the former does not automatically point to the latter, no matter how much Randy demands it.

So, yeah, I'm willing to accept, for argument's sake, that the apostles were real people because their existence is immaterial to the matter at hand.  We don't know how they died, or what threats they lived under while alive (if they were indeed alive), so the standard apologist wish casting and psychoanalysis of straw men still doesn't get him anywhere.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 8:50 pm)abaris Wrote:
(August 14, 2015 at 8:26 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Except that the apostles' deaths are mostly shrouded in mystery, AFAIK.

Oh, give it a rest. To be dead one has to be alive before. Not even that is proven.

Randy likes to pull what he calls facts out of brother anus. So the whole OP is the expected product of it's source.

Bbbbbut NT scholars Abaris! What's YOUR theory??

-_-
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
I think it's sad that Randy pulls out atheist scholars to show how reliable they are when they believe in all the "facts" he wants to establish, and then quickly shoves them under the bus before any of us notice that all this understanding still doesn't cause them to believe in the resurrection. This second part validates our position, using his own chosen historians.

Why are Ehrman and O'Neil still atheists, if you respect their historical study so much?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 9:05 am)Randy Carson Wrote:
Quote:Actually, this is the same thread all over again.
In the end, it can be broken down to:

'BBBBBUT THE TOMB WAS EMPTY!!!!1!1!1 WHAT'S YOUR THEORY HUH?!?!?!!'

All the objections to this line of thinking notwithstanding. I guess they're not in his scenario.

The apostles began to preach the resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem where Jesus was crucified and buried.

If the tomb wasn't empty, why didn't the authorities simply take the body from the tomb, parade it through the streets, and silence the Apostles?


Since the Gospels were written years and decades after the alleged events by unknown authors who were almost certainly not eyewitnesses, there is no reason to believe in their literal truth.  Dodgy
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
Heya Chas Big Grin
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
The fact that you can no longer see a six mile high bean stalk is evidence that it was cut down, therefore jack and the bean stalk is true.

Odins defeat of the ice giants is proved by the continued non-existence of ice giants.

An empty tomb (that on one can find) somewhere in the middle east is evidence for a series of improbable events as mention ad nauseum by our favourite whatever Randy is.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 8:26 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:
(August 14, 2015 at 7:00 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Kevin-

You're either not paying attention or not thinking or both.

It has been said by me and others MANY times that people die for their belief all the time.

What is not common is for people to lay down their lives for what they know to be a lie.

If the apostles made up the story of Jesus' resurrection, then they KNEW is was a lie. No one dies for what they know are lies.

Except that the apostles' deaths are mostly shrouded in mystery, AFAIK.  Judas hung himself/committed suicide due to his betrayal.  Beyond that, it is believed that Peter, Paul, and James were martyred (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostle_(C...e_Apostles).  And there's nothing about the others.

Indeed, your favorite quote mined source, Ehrman, talks about this on his blog (behind a pay wall: http://ehrmanblog.org/were-the-disciples...urrection/), dismissing your line of reasoning as a standard, and flawed, line of apologist reasoning.  "They wouldn't die for a lie" assumes that they were captured, tortured, and then put to death, or faced that as a punishment.  Yet, there's no evidence that the bulk of apostles died like that.  

And, indeed, people do risk themselves for a lie if it's a way to maintain/increase power.  Never forget that religion and politics were the same thing back then.


You seem to be hedging when you wrote, "There's no evidence that the bulk [emphasis added] of apostles died like that." That sounds like an admission that at least some of them undeniably did. Indeed, the death of Stephen by stoning is recorded in the book of Acts authored by Luke in the middle of the first century. The beheading of James, the Apostle, is also recorded in the book of Acts. The death of James, the brother of Jesus (and leader of the Church in Jerusalem (cf. Acts 15)) is recorded by Josephus. The deaths of Peter and Paul was recorded by Clement of Rome (Clement, Letter to the Corinthians, 5) before the end of the first century. Further, since Acts and subsequent non-canonical writings also record arrests, beatings and other unpleasantries heaped upon the earliest followers of Jesus, the pattern of persecution is undeniable. All of this could have been avoided if the disciples had simply gone back to their fishing boats in Galilee.

Finally, you speak of "power" as if the apostles were somehow the lords of some great empire, vast wealth and prestige. Really? The apostles lived out their days travelling on foot from city to city, under constant threat of arrest and death, despised by Jews, mocked by Romans...when and how exactly did the apostles enjoy this "power" of which you speak?
Reply
RE: DEBUNKING THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
(August 14, 2015 at 9:54 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: So, yeah, I'm willing to accept, for argument's sake, that the apostles were real people because their existence is immaterial to the matter at hand.  We don't know how they died, or what threats they lived under while alive (if they were indeed alive), so the standard apologist wish casting and psychoanalysis of straw men still doesn't get him anywhere.

The "matter at hand" is whether these "real people" conspired with regard to what they reported:

1. that Jesus was crucified, dead and buried,
2. that Jesus appeared to them alive again after his death
3. that Paul, the persecutor of the early Church, was converted
4. that James, the unbelieving brother of Jesus, was converted
3. that Jesus' tomb was found empty.

The Conspiracy Theory states that the apostles agreed to lie about all of these points.

Do you believe that this theory is the best explanation for the five points listed above?

If not, what is?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Best books debunking Christianity KiwiNFLFan 83 18263 January 16, 2020 at 10:21 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  a theory about modern xtian deconversion drfuzzy 14 3274 April 29, 2016 at 1:12 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  BBC's Conspiracy Road Trip: Creationism Cyberman 5 1665 March 12, 2016 at 8:45 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Planet Bieber update: Justin debunks the big bang theory TubbyTubby 32 6968 October 1, 2015 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Debunking the "Dying and Rising Gods" Theory Randy Carson 55 17476 September 22, 2015 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: abaris
  Christians to die out by diminished gene pool theory (sub-species) TubbyTubby 20 3853 August 20, 2015 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Debunking christianity dyresand 3 2147 July 19, 2015 at 11:56 am
Last Post: Metis
  Let's say the multiverse theory is true, how would a Christian insert God...? Mr. Moncrieff 21 7796 March 1, 2014 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution SavedByGraceThruFaith 512 237371 October 12, 2013 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: Kayenneh
  Do you believe in the mythist theory ? viocjit 14 5436 June 4, 2013 at 2:51 am
Last Post: FifthElement



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)