Apparently they were very nearly modern in their feet and had long legs, great for a biped. But shoulders were more ape like for climbing. Hands were probably good for tool use but some curvature for climbing as well.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 4:50 am
Thread Rating:
Remains of new human species found
|
I saw the thread title and immediately assumed the skeleton of the last US Biblical Literalist had been discovered tucked away in a forgotten display case in the basement of Ken Ham's museum.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(September 10, 2015 at 8:48 am)Exian Wrote: Why did they go with homo for Naledi? Can someone give a brief explanation for the criteria? Is it the feet and pelvis? Maybe the teeth? From amongst the earlier hominid ancestors that live from from roughly 4.5 to roughly 2 million years ago, the determination of which ought to be included in the genus homo, and what ought to be excluded, seems often more subjective than objective. But to be correct, the morphology of feet, pelvis, and teeth ought not to be the deciding criteria for each species. Rather, a species belong in the genus homo if either one of two criteria is fulfilled: 1. a particular species is suspected to be ancester all to all other homo species, and none of that species' descendants belonged to a genus other than homo, than that species itself belongs to homo genus. 2. If a particular species is clearly descended from another species which is indisputably a member of the genus homo, than the first species belong to the homo genus as well. But since DNA degrade and we have no easy way of determining just who is descendent from whom, we have to fall back on guesstimating using bone morphology.
Ah, thanks Chuck. Though, it seems bone morphology would be used to determine 1 and 2.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue
because fossils are usually incomplete, bone morphology is often suggestive rather than conclusive for determining 1 or 2.
According to CNN they apparently buried their dead.
Cool
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
(September 10, 2015 at 9:48 am)Divinity Wrote: According to CNN they apparently buried their dead. That might suggest they had some conception of life after death. Previously no hint of such conceptual ability have been found amongst any creature with a brain smaller than that of homosapien. This creature has the brain the size of a chimp. But, from what I read, the dead were shoved through a crack into a cave chamber. There were no word of evidence that efforts were made to make the dead comfortable. So IMHO the circumstances of these remains are not quite the equivalent of a burial with grave goods, so it is not conclusive this was a true burial that demand a conception of afterlife.
Could be a survival tactic to avoid attracting predators and scavengers.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue
The remains of humanoid reptilian folks. Obviously.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)