The funniest thing is, you can actually refute that in multiple ways.
And yet that is the standard for when someone has lost an argument.
Wow.
And yet that is the standard for when someone has lost an argument.
Wow.
What you see when you win a religious debate... x3
|
The funniest thing is, you can actually refute that in multiple ways.
And yet that is the standard for when someone has lost an argument. Wow. (October 19, 2015 at 7:50 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 19, 2015 at 7:42 pm)IanHulett Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/nM49C6z.png The morality of butt piracy I take it.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue RE: What you see when you win a religious debate... x3
October 19, 2015 at 8:54 pm
(This post was last modified: October 19, 2015 at 9:27 pm by IanHulett.)
(October 19, 2015 at 8:50 pm)Shining_Finger Wrote: The funniest thing is, you can actually refute that in multiple ways. I'll say I never looked up rebuttals to "you'll burn in hell". But that's because it's so stupid and childish that it's not worth wasting my one and only existence looking for ways to destroy it. I prefer to destroy real arguments. kek
If pinkie pie isn't real, then how do you explain the existence of ponies, huh? If ponies are real, then that's proof that Pinkie Pie is real. Checkmate, christians!
_______________________________ Let's stop fighting and and start smiling! This is our one and only life to live... let's be friends and live it with smiles! -- Book of Pinkie Pie 7:3 (October 19, 2015 at 7:42 pm)IanHulett Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/nM49C6z.png That's not him declaring you the winner. That's him shitting on the chessboard.
This is pretty typical of the response when the theist is out of arguments.
Either he/she consciously or unconsciously knew that they were cornered, and lashed out the only way they could. For the dogmatic, cognitive dissonance is a bitch! You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. RE: What you see when you win a religious debate... x3
October 20, 2015 at 7:45 am
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2015 at 7:45 am by robvalue.)
Some people open the "debate" with threats of hell. So it's more like a mugging than a conversation.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|