|
Rule Change (New Staff Power)
|
According to the urban dictionary, it is not intended as an insult but rather Australians just really like to nickname people, but they seem to find it amusing that people are offended by it.
I find the whole thing fascinating. I want to be nicknamed after a fruit. Murican is not a nice nickname. Give me something else. 
 (January 15, 2016 at 12:39 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(January 14, 2016 at 9:12 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: Is it possible some rogue staff member with an overbearing personality could convince all the other staff members to unanimously ban someone just because the staff member doesn’t like that particular user? You definitely fit the description of a rouge staff member, but then so do I.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
I'm sorry to interrupt all this important debate but.... Can we blow something up already? .-. .-. .-.
*nuclear launch detected*
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- 
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione  find the red dot, kill the Ghost before the nuke lands!!!!1111 eleven
 (January 15, 2016 at 9:21 am)Vic Wrote: I'm sorry to interrupt all this important debate but.... Can we blow something up already? .-. .-. .-. Yes... I know..... Wait for it. It'll come along soon enough. Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
  (January 14, 2016 at 10:16 pm)Losty Wrote: For my first year I refused to so much as glance at the rules page, on the principle that if there were any rules I couldn't naturally follow then it'd mean the forum isn't really for me. But now the place is my home and I wouldn't leave even if we got rules I didn't like. I've since read the rules but only just because I like being able to quote them when someone stupid or annoying is breaking or coming close to breaking them.Well, I inadvertently violated some of the rules at AF that are specific to this site, like no posting links until you’ve been here for at least 30 days or always make a comment to go with your links so people can discuss it. If I had taken the time to read the rules, I would have known better. As far as being disruptive, that’s a judgement call. It’s not a specific action, like calling somebody an asshole, but an overall result of one’s presence How many of us would have to leave if there were specific rules about what we can and cannot say here? Scene: Staff: You broke a rule. Rhonda. Rhonda: I did? Staff: Yes, you broke rule #387. Rhonda: Oh that. Well I didn’t know… Staff: Ignorance of the rules is no excuse. You are responsible for knowing all the rules at AF. Rhonda: Well, how many rules are there? Staff: At last count, there were…
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers. Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.  |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
