(January 20, 2016 at 2:45 am)robvalue Wrote: The problem there is that non-sceptics have a very different idea about what "evidence" is. At least, when talking about their pet superstition. I notice they're plenty sceptical about other things, and especially any idea which may challenge their superstition. So it's really selective standards.
Yes they do. They mistake wishful thinking and imagination and "it's popular" and "this holy person said" "my book says" and "personal experience". Selective and totally bias. The worst part they don't get is that all religions do this.
