Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 8:19 am
| Poll: Do think that the death penalty is ever appropriate? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| No, never. | 28 | 58.33% | |
| In very limited circumstances, such as multiple murders. | 14 | 29.17% | |
| For murder alone with aggravating circumstances. | 1 | 2.08% | |
| Any violent crime should be punished by death. | 3 | 6.25% | |
| Yes, as a common punishment for any serious crime. | 2 | 4.17% | |
| Total | 48 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
|
Atheism & the Death Penalty.
|
(January 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: If the cop is acting on immediate self defense, or defense of another person, the killing is justified. Min made a thread that's basically a long list of times when lethal force should not have been needed in that situation.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh (January 20, 2016 at 6:08 pm)Chad32 Wrote:(January 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: If the cop is acting on immediate self defense, or defense of another person, the killing is justified. My comment said "IF the cop is acting on immediate self defense, or defense of another person, the killing is justified." I never said that it was always the case.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Yeah, unfortunately that's pretty big if.
(January 20, 2016 at 7:24 am)Jehanne Wrote: Would you, as an atheist, support it? As for me, I would not, for the following reasons: Absolutely nucking fot, expesially in Emurica - becaws justis is nevur mor reliable than my typing!
Mr. Hanky loves you!
(January 20, 2016 at 1:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: My entirely personal, and emotional opinion on the matter is that those who lack empathy, and who demonstrate a cruel disregard for human life at the expense of the innocent (I.e. People who rape, torture, murder) forfeit their own right to be treated with humanity and respect for their dignity. Now, I'm not saying that all rapists and child abusers be executed, but I do think it is perfectly just to sentence the Ted Bundy's and Jeffrey Dahmer's of the world to death. Instances where people are deemed clinically insane, not able to discern right from wrong, and/or those who are not capable of controlling their actions would be my only exceptions. Would you be willing to carry out the death sentence yourself ("pull the lever," "push the button," etc.)? What if the condemned person were screaming, hollering, fighting for life, etc., as they were dragged kicking and screaming to the execution chamber? As for me, I could not do that; I would walk away. And, then, there's the question of botched executions, where the individual is left gasping, struggling for air, etc. I understand that you favor the death penalty, but would you be willing to carry it out? (January 20, 2016 at 5:45 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: So basically, the death penalty is only ok if that is the ONLY way to keep society safe from a killer. But if we are able to lock someone up for life, we no longer need to use the death penalty. Nowadays, we have the means of doing this, so a death sentence is no longer necessary and should not be used. Yet another instance where the Catholic Church has changed its/her tune, one that I, of course, applaud. RE: Atheism & the Death Penalty.
January 20, 2016 at 8:39 pm
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2016 at 8:59 pm by The Valkyrie.)
Considering my occupation I always get jumped on when I say this.
I support the death penalty for truly vile crimes and only if there's absolutely no doubt. Saying that: I'm a strong believer that a "life" sentence should mean just that: Life, not released after 10-20 years. If you've deliberately taken someone's life then you should end up in jail until they carry you out in a box. Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (January 20, 2016 at 8:19 am)Vic Wrote: Nope. Never. There's me without a need to elaborate.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)





