Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:02 am
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2016 at 7:03 am by robvalue.)
Personally, I think it's just a side effect of how the rules of reality work. Any life form that has survived a few generations obviously has the ability to survive, and the more it survives, the better it gets at it. Those variations that don't survive get killed and reproduce less. So those with better instincts are naturally selected...
Fast forward to us, and this idea will have been refined and concentrated an unimaginable number of times.
That's my take on it. It gives the illusion of a "will to survive", but really it's just cause and effect. And I think our consciousness is just a weird side effect of our brains working, which are basically organic computers.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 9:15 am
Personally, i don't think consciousness is anything special. I believe consciousness is when an organism can process information and react to it. This is the reason why,i believe, someone ko'd is unconsciouss because even though sensory information or other kinds of information may be being processed but there is an obvious inability to react to it...
Consciousness to me is an ability to react to processed information. Emphasis on "processed information", because plants can process information(photosenthesis and such) and react to it but rocks can't...
Thoughts?
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 9:35 am
I think consciousness, as we see it, is just a front. It's a kind of readout, which somehow produces an "experience", and gives the illusion of control and choice. But really, it's just telling a story.
I see no reason why non-life can't also experience things, but just have no way to display it like we do.
The idea of the "experience" is the super whacky part that I doubt I'll ever get my head round. It seems to be both an illusion, and possibly the only "reality" there is (we create realities by perceiving them). I don't know if science will ever get on top of it. I can't see how I can ever be sure anyone else is actually experiencing anything like I am. I'm forever trapped in a certain point of view which is inherently subjective.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 6:05 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2016 at 6:11 pm by ignoramus.)
Actually, I was completely wrong.
The question itself I asked was fallacious and out of ignorance.
Life, especially microbial life, like viruses, bacteria, etc aren't even aware of their own existence.
Mutations are are natural byproduct of a imperfect replication cycle.
Germs mutate and replicate at an alarming rate of knotts, so it's easy to think they are mutating in an endevour to survive.
All that's happening is that the mutated offspring survive if it is beneficial.
With targetted specific antidotes, the new mutations are usually not attacked and survive.
All this does is buy them some time to keep mutating further.
That can seem to emulate an intelligent defence. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Mother nature herself has never given 2 fucks about any life for she herself is blind and unconscious.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:33 pm
"How else can you explain the miracle of birth?"
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:37 pm
I haven't come across that one yet. I consider myself inoculated.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:38 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2016 at 7:38 pm by abaris.)
(February 23, 2016 at 6:05 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Life, especially microbial life, like viruses, bacteria, etc aren't even aware of their own existence.
How'd you know?
I mean, we all share that kind of thought when it comes to microbial life, but nobody asked them yet. Higher life is certainly aware. To use the words of evolutionary anthropologyst Brian Hare when asked if animals think: Of course they do.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:38 pm
(February 23, 2016 at 7:37 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I haven't come across that one yet. I consider myself inoculated.
That was from my ex-wife, whom I took to be smarter than that when I married her.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:40 pm
(February 23, 2016 at 7:38 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: That was from my ex-wife, whom I took to be smarter than that when I married her.
I hope, you got custody, if you happen to have children.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 23, 2016 at 7:49 pm
(February 23, 2016 at 7:38 pm)abaris Wrote: (February 23, 2016 at 6:05 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Life, especially microbial life, like viruses, bacteria, etc aren't even aware of their own existence.
How'd you know?
I mean, we all share that kind of thought when it comes to microbial life, but nobody asked them yet. Higher life is certainly aware. To use the words of evolutionary anthropologyst Brian Hare when asked if animals think: Of course they do.
I would have imagined that you need a brain for that.
Unless of course you believe consciousness is independent?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
|