Yabbut he is always throwing his asshat pronouncements around shamelessly and imperially. If he didn't want the hammer he shouldn't stick out so high.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 1:23 pm
Thread Rating:
My views on objective morality
|
(March 9, 2016 at 12:44 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:It's easy to pass judgement when you were...well, where the fuck were you during this discussion? You said before that you read the whole thread, and now you admit that you didn't. Why don't you just pick a lie and stick with it?
Mr. Hanky loves you!
(March 9, 2016 at 7:11 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Yabbut he is always throwing his asshat pronouncements around shamelessly and imperially. If he didn't want the hammer he shouldn't stick out so high. But he does so in a pathetic manner. Others ride the high horse of ignorant superiority. These are usually the ones deserving of bile. RE: My views on objective morality
March 9, 2016 at 7:19 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:54 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(March 9, 2016 at 3:59 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:God Of Mr Hanky Wrote:To be fair about it, I don't see anyone still passing judgement on CL, and a few of you are protecting pets of yours from all criticism as a means of building political clout around here. I still like CL, and I hope she comes back, but she should not be made by any sanctimonious assholes on a power play to believe her comments are above critical analysis, and she opened a serious can of worms with this thread. You made it clear yesterday that yo are attacking me because you believe you should be a moderator. The above makes clear why you are not, nor should you ever be.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
RE: My views on objective morality
March 9, 2016 at 7:36 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:38 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
I would like to remind all you sanctimonious assholes who showed up to point the finger after the action is over that Lady and I are not the only people behind this disaster with CL, and we didn't start the fire either. It was one of your own, Lucky (you named us exclusively), who pushed CL over the edge with his words, and I will never forget them: "You are a horrible, horrible person". That was Rhythm, who has been quiet through today. I believe his intent was good, but I know that I would not have used words like that with CL, and that actually says something because I know I'm not very kind. While I didn't like the words that were used, they could not be opposed while still pursuing the point that the problem of evil makes believers perverse in their morality. After Rhythm quietly bowed out, Lady and I were left to try and explain to CL, while she was crying over what he had called her, the point which was intended, but she could not be reached. Maybe we should have just let it go, but nobody wants to quit on hard feelings, and I thought we had almost made some progress with her - just couldn't slow down the momentum.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
RE: My views on objective morality
March 9, 2016 at 7:49 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 7:53 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(March 9, 2016 at 4:39 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:(March 9, 2016 at 12:08 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Sometimes justice really is more important than somebody's precious feelings, and arrogant special pleading should not be indefinitely overlooked just because the theist in question is cute and smooth. This means sometimes good people need to get their hands dirty. Justice doesn't matter here? Good, then in that case we don't need any mods! Honest to serious fuck, if we didn't take the injustices of religion very seriously, then we'd all be somewhere discussing Justin Bieber, or at a book club.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
(March 9, 2016 at 7:36 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: I would like to remind all you sanctimonious assholes who showed up to point the finger after the action is over that Lady and I are not the only people behind this disaster with CL, and we didn't start the fire either. It was one of your own, Lucky (you named us exclusively), who pushed CL over the edge with his words, and I will never forget them: "You are a horrible, horrible person". That was Rhythm, who has been quiet through today. I believe his intent was good, but I know that I would not have used words like that with CL, and that actually says something because I know I'm not very kind. While I didn't like the words that were used, they could not be opposed while still pursuing the point that the problem of evil makes believers perverse in their morality. After Rhythm quietly bowed out, Lady and I were left to try and explain to CL, while she was crying over what he had called her, the point which was intended, but she could not be reached. Maybe we should have just let it go, but nobody wants to quit on hard feelings, and I thought we had almost made some progress with her - just couldn't slow down the momentum. I don't think Luckie was accusing you of anything. She just stepped into the thread, she said she'd only seen a bit between certain people, and she said when she had time she would read the whole thread. If she gets through it, I'll be impressed. I think I made it to page 52 or so when I had to start responding because I couldn't bear to read any more. What Rhythm said was mean but I don't think it violated any rules and while I think calling her a horrible person was uncalled for I still agreed with the rest of his point. My views on objective morality
March 9, 2016 at 7:57 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 8:00 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(March 9, 2016 at 7:36 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: I would like to remind all you sanctimonious assholes who showed up to point the finger after the action is over that Lady and I are not the only people behind this disaster with CL, and we didn't start the fire either. It was one of your own, Lucky (you named us exclusively), who pushed CL over the edge with his words, and I will never forget them: "You are a horrible, horrible person". That was Rhythm, who has been quiet through today. I believe his intent was good, but I know that I would not have used words like that with CL, and that actually says something because I know I'm not very kind. While I didn't like the words that were used, they could not be opposed while still pursuing the point that the problem of evil makes believers perverse in their morality. After Rhythm quietly bowed out, Lady and I were left to try and explain to CL, while she was crying over what he had called her, the point which was intended, but she could not be reached. Maybe we should have just let it go, but nobody wants to quit on hard feelings, and I thought we had almost made some progress with her - just couldn't slow down the momentum. I'm taking some time to reflect on all that went down here, but yeah, let's remember: Rob called her a rape apologist, Benny said people here only defend her because her boobs are big, and rhythm told her to fuck off. If any mod action is warranted I feel it wholly unfair that hanky and I alone should have to shoulder that responsibility.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. (March 9, 2016 at 7:57 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 9, 2016 at 7:36 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: I would like to remind all you sanctimonious assholes who showed up to point the finger after the action is over that Lady and I are not the only people behind this disaster with CL, and we didn't start the fire either. It was one of your own, Lucky (you named us exclusively), who pushed CL over the edge with his words, and I will never forget them: "You are a horrible, horrible person". That was Rhythm, who has been quiet through today. I believe his intent was good, but I know that I would not have used words like that with CL, and that actually says something because I know I'm not very kind. While I didn't like the words that were used, they could not be opposed while still pursuing the point that the problem of evil makes believers perverse in their morality. After Rhythm quietly bowed out, Lady and I were left to try and explain to CL, while she was crying over what he had called her, the point which was intended, but she could not be reached. Maybe we should have just let it go, but nobody wants to quit on hard feelings, and I thought we had almost made some progress with her - just couldn't slow down the momentum. Is there a mod action?? Maybe I'll have to go through the 20 pages I missed because I saw you being nothing but respectful up to page 52. And I didn't see anyone violating any rules except maybe bennyboy when he said about CL maybe not being a woman. It might be considered a personal attack or bringing something too personal into the discussion. It's definitely not against the rules to tell someone to go fuck themselves the last I checked. (March 9, 2016 at 8:01 pm)Losty Wrote:(March 9, 2016 at 7:57 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I'm taking some time to reflect on all that went down here, but yeah, let's remember: Rob called her a rape apologist, Benny said people here only defend her because her boobs are big, and rhythm told her to fuck off. If any mod action is warranted I feel it wholly unfair that hanky and I should have to shoulder that burden alone. I'm not sure. Luckie mentioned it.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)