Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 11:44 pm

Poll: Who would win?
This poll is closed.
Clinton
76.60%
36 76.60%
Trump
23.40%
11 23.40%
Total 47 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump versus Clinton?
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
Personally I would use the term devolution for what rightwingers represent. If it wasn't that insulting to apes, that is. It's been 80 years since we last had that stink of cranial feces polluting the global atmosphere.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 3:40 pm)KUSA Wrote:
(March 24, 2016 at 2:54 pm)Sterben Wrote: Evolution can be used in many aspects, I was using the term "Evolution" in the context of improving ideas.
The improvement part is quite subjective.


Quote:GOP people like you steer away from the term Evolution cause it does not reflect your base.
I do not like the GOP, do not have a base of them, and fully subscribe to the theory of evolution.

Quote:When the founding fathers created America they were leaving a monarchy not a Parliament.
Irrelevant. The parliament is full of shit.

Quote:If you want to debate the use of the term "Evolution" let's debate then. I don't use dirty tactics or use a aggressive forms of debate like your hero Trump.

No need to as I fully subscribe to the theory. Trump is an example of evolution.
         You are right about him be a evolution in politics, it's just a step in the wrong wrong direction. Every evolution can not be considered a step forward he is step backwards. I hope that GOP can stop him from moving forward. An idiot is better choice then a dangerous candid like Trump.
     “A man isn't tiny or giant enough to defeat anything” Yukio Mishima


Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 6:05 am)Mr.wizard Wrote:
(March 23, 2016 at 11:12 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Well personally, xenophobic and racists is used to freely to the point that no one defines it anymore. When they explain how someone is racist or xenophobic, it usually doesn't fit, so those words don't mean much of anything anymore. In fact the same people that use them, are the ones that use the term white privledge which is a racist term, and doesn't really mean anything except to stereotype all white people, which is basically racism. 

So all the racist, xenophobic chants of the left, mean nothing. It's just parroting the media talking points.

This is just something xenophobes and racists tell themselves.

Sure because in the people confuse national identity with race. So when they hear the term Chinese, they think Chinese people, instead of the Chinese nation, or Mexico with Mexicans. They are nationalities, not races. Latinos, and Asians would be considered races, but even then, there is no race but the human race. It's just a divide and conquer technique used. I used to be a leftist, and consider myself liberal, but now liberal means something different. They are not the true Jeffersonian liberals like the founding father, they are aligned with Marxism, and classism, so everything has been inverted, and just like Satan, it's inverted to the point that we have the morons walking around saying it's racist to be against a religion, or now sexist to be against transgendered. It's always about being against something. Their isn't the uniting of people, except uniting the underclass against the upper class. The word human or people doesn't exist in the left anymore, because they gain their power by pitting groups against eachother. And to be honest, that has been done throughout history. Tribalism, has moved towards nationalism, and then we have globalism. With globalism, we have people that want to divide and conquer however, so it's almost like forcing a sorority to have a male member.
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 4:23 am)Jenny A Wrote:
(March 23, 2016 at 11:12 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Well personally, xenophobic and racists is used to freely to the point that no one defines it anymore. When they explain how someone is racist or xenophobic, it usually doesn't fit, so those words don't mean much of anything anymore. In fact the same people that use them, are the ones that use the term white privledge which is a racist term, and doesn't really mean anything except to stereotype all white people, which is basically racism. 

So all the racist, xenophobic chants of the left, mean nothing. It's just parroting the media talking points.

To be xenophobic is to be afraid of foreigners or foriegn ideas. What Kusa said is take your foriegn  ideas off to the foriegn countries they came from.

What's really wrong about that? Don't you understand the idea of common culture or how culture formed? If that's the case, why are you afraid of sharia law? Why are you against stoning women for adultury, or forced female mutilation where the clitoris is cut off, or throwing gay people off buildings? Why are you afraid of that? Are you not also xenophobic, or do you actually want that? Do you want to wear a burka? Do you want to walk around and not be forced to act in a way that others desire you? Well, I imagine you don't want any of that, but I'll let you respond.
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 11:07 pm)scoobysnack Wrote:
(March 24, 2016 at 6:05 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: This is just something xenophobes and racists tell themselves.

Sure because in the people confuse national identity with race. So when they hear the term Chinese, they think Chinese people, instead of the Chinese nation, or Mexico with Mexicans. They are nationalities, not races. Latinos, and Asians would be considered races, but even then, there is no race but the human race. It's just a divide and conquer technique used. I used to be a leftist, and consider myself liberal, but now liberal means something different. They are not the true Jeffersonian liberals like the founding father, they are aligned with Marxism, and classism, so everything has been inverted, and just like Satan, it's inverted to the point that we have the morons walking around saying it's racist to be against a religion, or now sexist to be against transgendered. It's always about being against something. Their isn't the uniting of people, except uniting the underclass against the upper class. The word human or people doesn't exist in the left anymore, because they gain their power by pitting groups against eachother. And to be honest, that has been done throughout history. Tribalism, has moved towards nationalism, and then we have globalism. With globalism, we have people that want to divide and conquer however, so it's almost like forcing a sorority to have a male member.
          How is sexist to be anti-transgender? That makes no sense, some people are just uncomfortable around those types. Being uncomfortable does not make you sexist. If your blood line is primarily _______ that's what you are no matter country you live in. How does Satan play a role in your argument?
     “A man isn't tiny or giant enough to defeat anything” Yukio Mishima


Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 11:28 pm)Sterben Wrote:
(March 24, 2016 at 11:07 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Sure because in the people confuse national identity with race. So when they hear the term Chinese, they think Chinese people, instead of the Chinese nation, or Mexico with Mexicans. They are nationalities, not races. Latinos, and Asians would be considered races, but even then, there is no race but the human race. It's just a divide and conquer technique used. I used to be a leftist, and consider myself liberal, but now liberal means something different. They are not the true Jeffersonian liberals like the founding father, they are aligned with Marxism, and classism, so everything has been inverted, and just like Satan, it's inverted to the point that we have the morons walking around saying it's racist to be against a religion, or now sexist to be against transgendered. It's always about being against something. Their isn't the uniting of people, except uniting the underclass against the upper class. The word human or people doesn't exist in the left anymore, because they gain their power by pitting groups against eachother. And to be honest, that has been done throughout history. Tribalism, has moved towards nationalism, and then we have globalism. With globalism, we have people that want to divide and conquer however, so it's almost like forcing a sorority to have a male member.
          How is sexist to be anti-transgender? That makes no sense, some people are just uncomfortable around those types. Being uncomfortable does not make you sexist. If your blood line is primarily _______ that's what you are no matter country you live in. How does Satan play a role in your argument?

Tell me about it. I've been called sexist for that or for saying that womens bathrooms shouldn't have anyone able to go based on their perspective, rather then their gender. Gender is now up to the person who they think they are. I could be male on Monday, and Female on Fridays, and sue you for not allowing me in your daughters locker rooms. Now we have people in public schools being put on gender reassignment lists in the US. 60% suicide rate for those that have had the procedure after being brainwashed and realize they can't reverse it. Satanism is really luciferianism for the occult in the US. Luciferianism isn't really understood here, but I could explain it. Short conclusion is to invert all understanding, and make black white, and up down. Luciferianism is an elite ideology, where basically Lucifer is the one who is agitator or adversary, and one who created the division in the garden of eden to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge which give the humans the knowledge of self awareness. This is one thing that most don't understand. Granted it is the free will which allows us to murder, steal, etc, but also allow us to be judged based on our choices. We are all imperfect, including me.
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 22, 2016 at 4:38 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(March 21, 2016 at 11:45 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Then the question is who really actually believes in a communist utopia? Considering the reeducation and work through labor camps, maybe the ruling party, but I seriously question why a poor person would still desire such a life based on lies.

How many actually do, and how many are born into it?

But your notion that the populations of former Communist countries were brainwashed is nonsense.The numbers of East Germans who died trying to get West demonstrate otherwise. The popularity of Solzhenitsyn in samizdat in the Communist days shows otherwise. The revolutions of 1989 show otherwise.

There are so many stories of people that are so involved they are brainwashed to go along with it. Usually they are involved in state jobs, and believe in the system. You must be forgetting about all the people that were pushing the system on the poor that were against it, and ended up in the camps. Remember a common theme of those that don't agree is a camp. All communist countries to this day has slave labor, and reeducation camps through labor. I still don't know why liberals support this, unless they think they will be in leadership positions enforcing the camps, and get off on it.
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 11:07 pm)scoobysnack Wrote:
(March 24, 2016 at 6:05 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: This is just something xenophobes and racists tell themselves.

Sure because in the people confuse national identity with race. So when they hear the term Chinese, they think Chinese people, instead of the Chinese nation, or Mexico with Mexicans. They are nationalities, not races. Latinos, and Asians would be considered races, but even then, there is no race but the human race. It's just a divide and conquer technique used. I used to be a leftist, and consider myself liberal, but now liberal means something different. They are not the true Jeffersonian liberals like the founding father, they are aligned with Marxism, and classism, so everything has been inverted, and just like Satan, it's inverted to the point that we have the morons walking around saying it's racist to be against a religion, or now sexist to be against transgendered. It's always about being against something. Their isn't the uniting of people, except uniting the underclass against the upper class. The word human or people doesn't exist in the left anymore, because they gain their power by pitting groups against eachother. And to be honest, that has been done throughout history. Tribalism, has moved towards nationalism, and then we have globalism. With globalism, we have people that want to divide and conquer however, so it's almost like forcing a sorority to have a male member.

WTF are you talking about!? I think your conspiracy overloaded brain just sprung a leak.
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
(March 24, 2016 at 11:07 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Sure because in the people confuse national identity with race. So when they hear the term Chinese, they think Chinese people, instead of the Chinese nation, or Mexico with Mexicans. They are nationalities, not races. Latinos, and Asians would be considered races, but even then, there is no race but the human race. It's just a divide and conquer technique used. I used to be a leftist, and consider myself liberal, but now liberal means something different. They are not the true Jeffersonian liberals like the founding father, they are aligned with Marxism, and classism, so everything has been inverted, and just like Satan, it's inverted to the point that we have the morons walking around saying it's racist to be against a religion, or now sexist to be against transgendered. It's always about being against something. Their isn't the uniting of people, except uniting the underclass against the upper class. The word human or people doesn't exist in the left anymore, because they gain their power by pitting groups against eachother. And to be honest, that has been done throughout history. Tribalism, has moved towards nationalism, and then we have globalism. With globalism, we have people that want to divide and conquer however, so it's almost like forcing a sorority to have a male member.

See, that's why language is very important. The main reason why I call people like you or Kusa and all your brethren in spirit bigots. Racism, as I explained before, is only a very small segment of bigotry. Your above quote shows the necessity to close the loophole. Bigots usually use it to wiggle out by crying "I'm not racist, because my favorite hated group isn't a race". No, it's not racism, but it's in the same ugly spirit.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
If you think Mein Drumpf can survive a general with this add playing against him, you must be smoking some good shit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkSRJSUY0vs
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bill Clinton and Ukraine Interaktive 4 501 August 5, 2022 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Transgenderism versus Interracial Marriage. Jehanne 3 732 April 18, 2021 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Are more Trump signs indicative of Trump winning? Dingo 15 1425 October 1, 2020 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Trump VS Trump (not exactly political news but I have no idea where to post this) Cepheus Ace 0 37782 February 12, 2019 at 2:15 am
Last Post: Cepheus Ace
  Do you feel different about Bill Clinton's sexual past? CapnAwesome 89 14405 November 23, 2017 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Haipule
  Liberals versus Leftists Neo-Scholastic 67 13966 November 5, 2017 at 3:10 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Trump could be booted, installing Clinton as president Silver 18 5017 June 9, 2017 at 8:47 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm awfully confused: how do Trump supporters relate to Trump NuclearEnergy 11 3522 March 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Diversity versus Inequality Neo-Scholastic 10 1621 December 1, 2016 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Is Trump's election bad for Trump's businesses? Jehanne 22 4826 November 15, 2016 at 1:03 am
Last Post: CWoods



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)