Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 20, 2016 at 7:10 pm
(March 20, 2016 at 4:55 pm)maestroanth Wrote: For example, recently I was debating with a guy whether if perfect pitch is a 'learned ability' or an ability people are simply 'born-with it'. I have perfect pitch and I learned it about 13 years ago as a teenager and my skill actually exceeded many of those that were 'born-with-it'. Anyway, so my argument was simple: Since obviously our notation system is a man-made system, and not made by nature, obviously there is no way to be 'born-with-it'.
Birds? Whales?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 28870
Threads: 528
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 20, 2016 at 7:56 pm
A new creationist always comes around thinking that they have the answer. Have yet to see one but that does not stop them.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 8705
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 20, 2016 at 10:03 pm
(March 20, 2016 at 6:21 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Dude... what's an "intensive purpose"?
A mangling of "intents and purposes" maybe?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 29101
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 21, 2016 at 2:20 am
(March 20, 2016 at 6:33 pm)Alex K Wrote: The Nye-Ham debate might have exposed some kids there for the first time to a straight representation of how evolution works and what it is.
To me, this is the benefit of debates. The audience at home can think about what's being said, learn some things, and maybe be brought round to a more rational way of thinking. This is the intended target.
If you remove that audience, for example in a private debate with an entrenched theist, there is probably no point at all.
Posts: 233
Threads: 28
Joined: February 4, 2016
Reputation:
10
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 21, 2016 at 2:33 am
Nothing is really pointless. Everything has a point. The point of Evolution and creation debates are to try and debunk the opposing side of what someone defines as truth. I learned a lot from these debates. Tiktallik (i probably spelled that wrong, spellcheck is disabled on my phone for some reason),and Pre-Cambrian fossils. Hell, it was the debates mainly that led me to the conclusion that since we have no evidence for a god of any kind, then he probably doesnt exist.
Posts: 104
Threads: 19
Joined: December 14, 2015
Reputation:
2
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 25, 2016 at 11:00 pm
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2016 at 11:40 pm by maestroanth.)
Posts: 104
Threads: 19
Joined: December 14, 2015
Reputation:
2
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 26, 2016 at 1:46 am
(This post was last modified: March 26, 2016 at 1:48 am by maestroanth.)
(March 20, 2016 at 7:10 pm)IATIA Wrote: (March 20, 2016 at 4:55 pm)maestroanth Wrote: For example, recently I was debating with a guy whether if perfect pitch is a 'learned ability' or an ability people are simply 'born-with it'. I have perfect pitch and I learned it about 13 years ago as a teenager and my skill actually exceeded many of those that were 'born-with-it'. Anyway, so my argument was simple: Since obviously our notation system is a man-made system, and not made by nature, obviously there is no way to be 'born-with-it'.
Birds? Whales?
(March 26, 2016 at 1:46 am)maestroanth Wrote: (March 20, 2016 at 7:10 pm)IATIA Wrote: Birds? Whales?
Posts: 35403
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 26, 2016 at 1:51 am
The debate is only pointless due to theists who cannot differentiate reason from mythology.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Posts: 3848
Threads: 137
Joined: January 19, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 26, 2016 at 2:05 am
It's often pointless because creationists want to debate facts - something I refuse to do. If something is classified as a fact it's because there is no more room for debate. The debate's over. Such is the case with evolution. It's NOT the case with abiogenesis but we do KNOW present lifeforms have evolved from simpler ones over a period of several billion years. I firmly believe that debating said fact gives false justification that there is any doubt that it is fact. So not only is it pointless, it's harmful and misleading.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Posts: 104
Threads: 19
Joined: December 14, 2015
Reputation:
2
RE: Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless?
March 26, 2016 at 2:25 am
(March 20, 2016 at 7:10 pm)IATIA Wrote: (March 20, 2016 at 4:55 pm)maestroanth Wrote: For example, recently I was debating with a guy whether if perfect pitch is a 'learned ability' or an ability people are simply 'born-with it'. I have perfect pitch and I learned it about 13 years ago as a teenager and my skill actually exceeded many of those that were 'born-with-it'. Anyway, so my argument was simple: Since obviously our notation system is a man-made system, and not made by nature, obviously there is no way to be 'born-with-it'.
Birds? Whales?
They can't name notes......
|