Hope for America!!

[Thumpalumpacus]

Am I misremembering something, or did Drich once say that he is a foster parent?

I wonder what the Florida Department of Children and Families would think if they read posts like his coming from a foster parent?

Notice how Drich hasn't returned or replied to this thread since I asked this?

[Drich]

I see your confusion. It's based on my use of the term "whatever it takes." You wrongly assume "what ever it takes" refers to an escalation in violence. again no. Whatever it take simple refers not taking any tools or methods off the table. If spanking is not working then one must move on. if it is then you have your answer there as well.

Did you see that Chalupa Dreaming? that's how you give someone enough slack to hang themselves... You let them think they have you on your heels and when the press in for the kill you kick out the chair and "ack" (the sound one makes when they are being hung)

He "answered" in post 388

Mothra like to do victory laps in the middle of a race.

Drich, I know you have a hard time deciphering lies from truth. So point out to me where in the quote did you tell exactly how far you will go with the physical punishment. How far are you willing to take it. That was the question. What is your limit, that's what she asked. And you didn't answer. I'd honestly rather not know so feel free to continue your lie about how you already answered.

Again, Whatever it takes means to literally do whatever it takes. If it means to whip you kid then that's what you do, If it means adopting a different method of behavior modification then that's what you do.

As far as how much will i whip a kid? no more or less than what i have predetermined to be an acceptable experience for the given offense. First offense 1 to 2 swats up to 5 for repeat offenses. then if that still does not work again in the spirit of "whatever it takes" we move on.

[Drich]

I'm talking about the present smart guy. I'm saying I have an adult child who has children.

Yes, I know.  That's why your point about your kid is irrelevant, because you have the benefit of hindsight. Earlier you said that you would know how they would turn out, implicitly ahead of time.

Do you really need me to explain this? Fucking moron. If your child turned out non-sociopathic, it's only because you got lucky.

again even if they were a sociopath it does not mean they would manifest negative attributes. There are entire countries who's cultures once stood on what you douche bags would identify as being sociopaths in nature, this however does not mean that all people who did not consider the feelings of the individual were bad.

Knowing who they would be means that even if the kid turned out as a sociopath I know what type of person he/she would become.

[Drich]

Climate change is real, as it's obvious that we have been getting warmer since the last ice age. The cause is wrong.

On can not say carbon emissions have done done "x" if solar output is a non recorded variable. Solar output is not a constant, and it has the majority impact on our weather. Some years the sun burn hotter than others. The earth's orbit also effects climate. we do not orbit the sun like a wheel on an axle, it's like a very large very long protracted hula hoop. again no way to record that.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sci...unclimate/

"Carbon emissions" was Al gore's version of the sky is falling and we can save ourselves if we all pay a carbon tax. It's all leftist crap. Even the scientists who pioneered the whole thing were caught falsifying data and cashing in. The business of 'global warming' is a 22 BILLION dollar per year industry. You can not tell me that with money like that at stake people are not lining up to sell their integrity to get a piece of the 22billion.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...l-warming/

Ok moron, you do understand that scientific fields, all of them are based on the  same idea of observation, compare and contrast and control groups. But like all theists even when they accept SOME science, always run when that points away from their club's claims.

Law under government certainly entitles everyone to their own opinions, but in science, nobody is entitled to their own facts.

The experts on spanking say it only works SHORT TERM but not for good reasons, it is still rule out of fear, and negative reinforcement with physical pain does have long term affects. They can become bullies themselves, and become the verbally abusive boss, or they can go on to abuse their kids. And for those like me, it can cause trust issues and increase anxiety and depression. 

Authoritarian rule is not love, it is dictation and "obey me or else" which has nothing to do with setting a child up to be well adjusted with good conflict resolution skills.

You do NOT need to cause physical pain to get a child to do what you want. If you cant do that, then the problem is you, not the kid.

Spanking is just one avenue of the larger training system I have been talking about. your arguement that only focuses in the process of breaking a child from his unwanted behavior is not an honest assessment of the system as a whole. Because one you break a child of his foolish ways you have to replace it with something else. To spank and walk away is foolishness

[Drich]

Am I misremembering something, or did Drich once say that he is a foster parent?

I wonder what the Florida Department of Children and Families would think if they read posts like his coming from a foster parent?

Notice how Drich hasn't returned or replied to this thread since I asked this?

the thread was not addressed to me, and
i do not post on the weekends (usally)

[I_am_not_mafia]

Again, Whatever it takes means to literally do whatever it takes. If it means to whip you kid then that's what you do, If it means adopting a different method of behavior modification then that's what you do.

As far as how much will i whip a kid? no more or less than what i have predetermined to be an acceptable experience for the given offense. First offense 1 to 2 swats up to 5 for repeat offenses. then if that still does not work again in the spirit of "whatever it takes" we move on.

again even if they were a sociopath it does not mean they would manifest negative attributes.

Straight from the horse's mouth.

[Faith No More]

I notice that in Drich's parenting style, the only concern is obedience.  There's no mention of emotional or intellectual development.  No mention of mental or physical health.  The only thing he is concerned about is blind obedience from his kids.  I guess when you live your life as a slave, obedience is all you know.

The thing is, corporal punishment isn't even necessary when it comes to obedience.  I've never spanked my kids, yet at the last parent/teacher conference, my oldest's teacher raved about how well behaved he is.  

And does anyone else find it funny that Mr. Ultra-Conservative is celebrating a public official laying their hands on another person's kids?  Where's the outrage at government overreach we're so used to?

[Thumpalumpacus]

Notice how Drich hasn't returned or replied to this thread since I asked this?

the thread was not addressed to me, and
i do not post on the weekends (usally)

You've never shut up interjecting into anyone's conversations before ... why start now?

[Thumpalumpacus]

Yes, I know.  That's why your point about your kid is irrelevant, because you have the benefit of hindsight. Earlier you said that you would know how they would turn out, implicitly ahead of time.

Do you really need me to explain this? Fucking moron. If your child turned out non-sociopathic, it's only because you got lucky.

again even if they were a sociopath it does not mean they would manifest negative attributes. There are entire countries who's cultures once stood on what you douche bags would identify as being sociopaths in nature, this however does not mean that all people who did not consider the feelings of the individual were bad.

Knowing who they would be means that even if the kid turned out as a sociopath I know what type of person he/she would become.

Get your popcorn, folks. After defending chattel slavery and child-abuse, our dolt-in-residence Drich the Idiotic is preparing to undertake the defense of sociopathy.

As for knowing the future, you'll need to prove that with a prediction that comes true in the future -- not one you can claim with the benefit of hindsight. That shit doesn't work for your steaming turd of a Bible, and it certainly isn't going to work for you and your lying. I can see you're having tremendous difficulty with understanding the difference between the past and the future, and I understand that you're laboring under the constraints of an ideology that won't let you practice critical thinking, but it really is pretty simple. Even an idiot like you should be able to get it.

Maybe I simply gave too much benefit of the doubt, and you're much more an idiot than I had thought?

[KevinM1]

Popcorn got.