Evidence for atheist claims

[robvalue]

I won't be asking you anything. You've blown your chance at honest debate.

[LastPoet]

Knowledge is demonstrable. Theology is not.

Jump off a building asking god to help you and you will find gravity way more cruel.

[robvalue]

There are people out there who understand the science. I can go to them. They can explain it to me. They can point me to the evidence and the research. If I'm suitably qualified, I can then see for myself. It's not realistic that I'm going to know everything about science, or have all the evidence for everything in my lunch box. Ben already came forward with a useful link, as I requested.

There is no one in the whole world who can explain how theology has anything to do with reality.

At the very very best, this guy is saying "atheists are as stupid as theists". Is that a win, really? And obviously, that's balancing the whole of science on my head alone, for some reason. I'm not even a scientist. I'm just familiar with the scientific method and have a basic understanding of things.

[Ben Davis]

I asked a basical question: "How did this earth come into existence?" and absolutely no one answered me.

Erm, excuse me. Have you been reading my posts?

[robvalue]

He means no one vomited an entire scientific department and research lab onto a single forum post.

Funnily enough, I don't see any gods or jesuses around here either.

[Pat Mustard]

I am starting this post because, so far, no atheist ever showed me evidence for their beliefs (or as you say, "lack of beliefs") and I am curious. I will play the person you believe I am, a "dumb redneck christian" and I will ask you things so you can answer them to me with evidence, of course. First question:

If God did not create the earth, how is it that we have an earth here and we live in it? Also, I beg, provide evidence for your claims.

First of all there is no such thing as an atheist claim. Atheists simply fail to suspend their disbelief in god while there is insufficient evidence to back its existence.
Second of all, as the one making the claim it is up to you to provide evidence, not us.

Frankly, I find it pretty shitty of you to come on here and demand we do your work for you. If you want us to accept god is real provide us with tangible, testable and repeatable evidence of its existence.

[Whateverist]

I am starting this post because, so far, no atheist ever showed me evidence for their beliefs (or as you say, "lack of beliefs") and I am curious.

I'm afraid you'll just have to take my word for it. There is no third person basis for assessing what beliefs I do or do not possess. I say I'm god-belief free. You are free to call me a liar but there is no evidence beyond my first person report. Take it or leave it.

I will play the person you believe I am, a "dumb redneck christian" and I will ask you things so you can answer them to me with evidence, of course. First question:

If God did not create the earth, how is it that we have an earth here and we live in it? Also, I beg, provide evidence for your claims.

How the hell should I know "how we have an earth here"? I wasn't here as it accreted. I fail to see why anyone should think "goddidit" is the default explanation for anything we can't explain naturally.

Of course there is unanimous agreement amongst scientists* who study such things regarding the general story line of the earth's formation. I hope you aren't seriously asking me, a lay person, to vouchsafe their theory. Are you? That would be rather silly.


*You probably are aware that creationists have been trying to infiltrate science in order to inject biblical notions of our's and the cosmos' origins into the 'debate'. But that is really beside the point.

[Wryetui]

I am starting this post because, so far, no atheist ever showed me evidence for their beliefs (or as you say, "lack of beliefs") and I am curious. I will play the person you believe I am, a "dumb redneck christian" and I will ask you things so you can answer them to me with evidence, of course. First question:

If God did not create the earth, how is it that we have an earth here and we live in it? Also, I beg, provide evidence for your claims.

First of all there is no such thing as an atheist claim. Atheists simply fail to suspend their disbelief in god while there is insufficient evidence to back its existence.
Second of all, as the one making the claim it is up to you to provide evidence, not us.

Frankly, I find it pretty shitty of you to come on here and demand we do your work for you. If you want us to accept god is real provide us with tangible, testable and repeatable evidence of its existence.

I do not like the theology of the calvinists, but I must accept they do a good job with apologetics. To quote a post of a site named "CARM":

This article is titled: "Atheists err when asking for material evidence for God's existence".

"Atheists often ask for evidence to prove that God exists. They say that they want tangible, testable evidence that can be verified via the scientific method. Unfortunately for them, such a request is the wrong approach. Instead, they should look for evidence consistent with a Transcendent God. Let me show you why.

First of all, the scientific method is a system of learning that consists of observation, hypothesis, experimentation, prediction, and theory. It is based on logic and observations of the material universe and its properties.
Second, the scientific method, along with a materialistic worldview, necessarily excludes transcendence--that which exists independent of the universe. Therefore, it can't detect what is outside of the material realm since it is based on observing things inside the material realm.
Third, the Christian worldview proclaims a transcendent God who exists outside of and independent of the material universe. In other words, the Christian God is not dependent upon the material universe or its properties for His existence.

Therefore, to ask for scienfically testable, material, non-transcendent based evidence for an immaterial, transcendent God is the wrong approach because it is a category mistake--explained below.
But, this is not to say that there are not material evidence is for God's existence. For example, Jesus walked on the earth 2,000 years ago as a physical man who, according to Scripture, is God in flesh (John 1:1, 14, Colossians 2:9) and who rose from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). He showed Thomas the wounds of His crucifixion ordeal that had led to that death (John 20:25-28), thereby demonstrating His resurrection. This is material evidence. But, of course, we don't have access to it.

Category Mistake
A category mistake is an error in logic in which one category of a thing is presented as belonging to another category. For example, to say that "the rock is alive" assigns the category of life to an inanimate object. Another example would be to judge the beauty of a painting based on how much it weighs. This is a category error since the category of beauty is not determined by the category of weight.
So, for the atheist to work from inside his materialistic, non-transcendent worldview and require evidence for the non-material, transcendent God (which necessarily exists outside his perceived worldview) risks being a category mistake because it is asking for the non-transcendent evidence of the transcendent in a form that is restricted to testable, material form. It is like asking to have a thought placed on a scale. It doesn't work because they are different categories.
But, some will assert that it is fair to ask for some sort of demonstration that such a Transcendent Being exists. After all, if there is no evidence of Him, how can we know He exists? For that, see What kind of evidence should we expect from a transcendent God?
What is left for the materialist atheist to do?
This means that the materialist atheist cannot logically require material-based evidence for the immaterial without committing a category mistake, so he is left with the option of trying to demonstrate that the Christian worldview is internally incoherent. After all, if he cannot show that Christian theism is false, then how can he rationally retain his atheism?
But, to step into the Christian worldview and attempt to show that it is not true, the atheist must use logic. This requires the use of the Laws of Logic. The problem is that these Laws are transcendent in that they are not dependent on the physical universe or its properties for their validity (See, The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God, points 5-8). But for the materialist atheist to presuppose the validity of transcendental Logical Truths--in order to argue against a Transcendental God--is inherently self-contradictory since he would be using transcendentals to argue against a Transcendental God.
Furthermore, it would mean that the materialist atheist is presupposing the validity of the transcendental Laws of Logic--without being able to justify them from within his materialistic worldview. To presuppose their validity is to commit the logically fallacy of begging the question.

Conclusion
The materialist atheist is left without a valid means in falsifying Christian Theism, which means his atheism cannot be validated as being true.

1. He cannot rightfully require material, non-transcendent evidence for a non-material, transcendent God without committing a category mistake. He must abandon his materialistic worldview, but this is incompatible with his atheist worldview.
2. He cannot enter into the Christian worldview, which is based on a Transcendent God, and use the transcendent laws of logic without being self-contradictory in his approach."

[robvalue]

Yeah... but we don't give a fuck about that. We don't need to justify ourselves to anyone thank you. I don't need to go around proving magic pixies aren't real either. I have better things to do.

You're just here to try and make yourself feel better. I was one of the few people giving you the benefit of the doubt. What are you going to do now? A victory dance?

You wouldn't know logic if it bit you on the ass.

[Edwardo Piet]

I asked a basical question: "How did this earth come into existence?" and absolutely no one answered me.

We don't know but you don't know either, you just think you do. It's fine with it being a mystery. I understand you think that not only must there be an explanation but it must be God, but you only think that, you don't know it, you think that you know it but you don't know it you just think that you know it. I only think that you don't, but as much as you think you can prove me wrong, you can't, you just think you can. I am not on my high horse but I think you are on yours so I think it's best you get off it. The rewards for your own increase in humility will be huge and make you a lot more rational and less distressed. Good luck.