Choseing to be a part of the silent majority
May 13, 2016 at 9:37 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2016 at 9:42 pm by Sterben.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 9:19 pm
| Poll: In November what is your course of action? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Staying home | 2 | 10.00% | |
| Democrat | 12 | 60.00% | |
| Republican | 0 | 0% | |
| Thrid Party | 6 | 30.00% | |
| Total | 20 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
|
Choseing to be a part of the silent majority
|
|
Other people are running for all kinds of offices beside the Presidency. Vote for some of those dummies and crooks.
Not risking Donald Trump making 3+ supreme court nominations for a generation.
This staying home bullshit is dumber than Trump. Local/State/Federal elections are still on the line. You don't just go to vote for President.
That is quite true Wyrd, there is a lot of those on some states tickets. If only there was a option to vote for the new laws and bypass the presidential questions. My state does not have the option which sucks.
(May 13, 2016 at 10:13 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Not risking Donald Trump making 3+ supreme court nominations for a generation. Hillary choosing the 3+ supreme court nominations would be equally as bad. I don't trust that womans judgment at all, if it was Warren running for president I'd be voting. She is much more level headed the Hillary. (May 13, 2016 at 10:25 pm)Sterben Wrote:If we only knew which one won't pick Jews and Catholics....(May 13, 2016 at 10:13 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Not risking Donald Trump making 3+ supreme court nominations for a generation.
What? She's a liberal. She'd choose liberal/moderate leaning judges. She's beholden to the Democratic party, and she'd be the incumbent for re-election.
You are just intentionally dense. You have literally no idea what you're talking about. (May 13, 2016 at 10:16 pm)Sterben Wrote: That is quite true Wyrd, there is a lot of those on some states tickets. If only there was a option to vote for the new laws and bypass the presidential questions. My state does not have the option which sucks. You don't have to vote for President; just ignore that section. (May 13, 2016 at 10:29 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(May 13, 2016 at 10:16 pm)Sterben Wrote: That is quite true Wyrd, there is a lot of those on some states tickets. If only there was a option to vote for the new laws and bypass the presidential questions. My state does not have the option which sucks. My mom tried that last election and the voting computer would not let her bypass the section. I'm not sure if it was glitch or if it's required by my state's law that you have to vote for a presidential candidate.
So vote for Howard Dean or write in Bernie Sanders
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


