Conservapedia definition of atheism

[tavarish]

Creation Scientists tend to win creation-evolution debates



Yes. clearly.

[Autumnlicious]

I'm quite proud of my contribution to Conservapedia, which has been there over a year without anyone noticing:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Post-Diluvi...#Volcanoes

I've also written lies on the article about Ray Comfort, and "Evolution Syndrome".

The Post-Noachian Flood Volcano Theory comes from the example of Krakatoa, which, in 1883, erupted and destroyed most of the island, thus remaining lifeless for many years. Still the same life that was there before the eruption eventually came back. It is possible that volcanoes in the Mount Ararat region were able to transport the smaller animals over much greater distances than the animals could get just by walking.

Sometimes Adrian, I don't know if I should punch you or congratulate you. One of these days, I'll do both.

[Tiberius]

Prove it didn't happen and I'll let you punch me as many times as you want

[downbeatplumb]

Starts off fairly reasonable then gets more and more insulting as it goes on.

Did they change it since you posted? It starts of defining atheism as the "denial of the existence of God". The use of the word "denial" is a loaded term that implies the person is trying to make believe an obvious reality doesn't exist. It quickly goes downhill from there, as in the very next sentence.

I didnt say it started off right.
I can forgive errors, its the bile that was directed in the lower reaches of the "definition" that got my blood up.

[DeistPaladin]

I didnt say it started off right.
I can forgive errors, its the bile that was directed in the lower reaches of the "definition" that got my blood up.

Ah, it's all relative I guess. To be honest, I never made it very far down the article.

[downbeatplumb]

I didnt say it started off right.
I can forgive errors, its the bile that was directed in the lower reaches of the "definition" that got my blood up.

Ah, it's all relative I guess. To be honest, I never made it very far down the article.

You should, you really should, turns out when we're not commiting suicide and performing abortions we're mass murdering.

Didnt get quite to the bottom of the page but have no doubt by then we'd all be baby rapists or something!!

[Rhizomorph13]

I'm quite proud of my contribution to Conservapedia, which has been there over a year without anyone noticing:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Post-Diluvi...#Volcanoes

I've also written lies on the article about Ray Comfort, and "Evolution Syndrome".

Oh no man, they are on to you! They called you on your falsehood! Did you NOT see the link that says "Biblical Citation Needed"? Obviously they are about to pull what you wrote unless you back it up with cold hard facts...


...from the bible.

[Tiberius]

Actually, I added the link to "Biblical Citation Needed" to further the joke...

[yuriythebest]

Within the evolutionary science community and the creation science community, Richard Dawkins has faced charges of engaging in pseudoscience and also has faced charges of committing elementary errors.

hmm.... soo the creationists are accusing dawkins of pseudoscience? how does one even respond to that??

[Edwardo Piet]

With laughter.