Well this makes interesting reading.

Starts off fairly reasonable then gets more and more insulting as it goes on.

Seems us atheists are just a bunch of shits according to the right wing nonsense peddlers.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism

I would call it unfit for human consumption.

(August 5, 2010 at 4:08 pm)lrh9 Wrote: I would call it unfit for human consumption.

That describes Conservapedia as a whole.

(August 5, 2010 at 4:10 pm)Paul the Human Wrote:

(August 5, 2010 at 4:08 pm)lrh9 Wrote: I would call it unfit for human consumption.

That describes Conservapedia as a whole.

Has anybody here ever visited rationalwiki.org?
When it's not trying to debunk unscientific principles, it's got a lot of articles about some of the... oddities and examples of Groupthink on Conservapedia.

oh, I love Conservapedia! they are a good laugh. Except they think they are serious.

I'm quite proud of my contribution to Conservapedia, which has been there over a year without anyone noticing:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Post-Diluvi...#Volcanoes

I've also written lies on the article about Ray Comfort, and "Evolution Syndrome".

You know what's really funny? I heard that a conservative group are going to re-write the bible based on conservative principles.

Apparently, the idea is stated in the conservapedia as follows: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

Also:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05...10037.html
http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/200...bible.html

Apparently god and jesus are too liberal for some people.
I swear, it still makes me laugh when Colbert mentions that reality has a liberal bias because I'm surprised no actual conservatives have said anything to that nature with any level of seriousness in their tone.

(August 5, 2010 at 3:37 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Starts off fairly reasonable then gets more and more insulting as it goes on.

Did they change it since you posted? It starts of defining atheism as the "denial of the existence of God". The use of the word "denial" is a loaded term that implies the person is trying to make believe an obvious reality doesn't exist. It quickly goes downhill from there, as in the very next sentence.

You should hear what I think of those superstitious mother fuckers.


Oh...that's pretty much it.

(August 5, 2010 at 5:12 pm)TheDarkestOfAngels Wrote: You know what's really funny? I heard that a conservative group are going to re-write the bible based on conservative principles.

Apparently, the idea is stated in the conservapedia as follows: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

Also:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05...10037.html
http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/200...bible.html

Apparently god and jesus are too liberal for some people.
I swear, it still makes me laugh when Colbert mentions that reality has a liberal bias because I'm surprised no actual conservatives have said anything to that nature with any level of seriousness in their tone.

I heard about that! It's nice to know that people can change a 2,000 year old religious book (which is SUPPOSED to be sacred to them) anyway they want because it's "too liberal". Apparently gay marriage as a sin (not to count all those other fun things that are sins) and a burning lake of fire reserved for sinners is not conservative enough for them!