1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
|
1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
|
Popular logic will always be logical because it is still logic?
You'll need to define what you mean by logic. Most Christians here will swear that God is a logical conclusion. We need more specific information.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.  (June 17, 2016 at 6:49 am)ignoramus Wrote: -Popular logic will always be logical because it is still logic?- ignoramus, you may look at my answers above.  RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 17, 2016 at 7:48 am
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 8:18 am by Aoi Magi.)
(June 17, 2016 at 7:28 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Do you think it's possible that The bible was put together by people who were thinking lets show God doing evil things and expect them to believe that God is good and that The Bible is the perfect word of God or do you think it's possible that bad parts were added to corrupt it to mislead people into believing the wrong things ? The bible wasn't written in a day, and when you look at the stories you can see the traces of mentality from those varied times. To an outsider god's acts seem bad, but think from the perspective of a small tribe, if they have a supernatural entity aiding them and killing their enemies, then for them that entity is good. If in their society females are treated like shit, then the "good" and moral god from their perspective would have to conform to that mentality as well... As for moses and jesus, I don't really care what one fictional character says about another.. Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty. Join me on atheistforums Slack  (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)  
Wtf is this guy talking about?!
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.  RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 17, 2016 at 8:09 am
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 8:09 am by Homeless Nutter.)
This guy is like a christian Rik, minus the emoji...
 I don't want to be THAT guy, but... Do we really need another one?
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
(June 17, 2016 at 8:09 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: This guy is like a christian Rik, minus the emoji... LOL, did we ever really need the first one? [emoji13]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. (June 17, 2016 at 7:57 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Wtf is this guy talking about?! LadyForCamus, If someone said to you that someone isn't a Christian and then you worked to use The No True Scotsman Fallacy to show them how you think they were wrong to say that and then later you looked at the words in 1 john 4:1, do you think you would judge yourself wrong for working to prove what you wanted by The No True Scotsman Fallacy ? (June 17, 2016 at 8:20 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:(June 17, 2016 at 7:57 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Wtf is this guy talking about?! Why would one look to justify their actions by a book when they believe that book to be bs to begin with? Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty. Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
![[Image: tmPmhjd.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FtmPmhjd.jpg)
