I shouldn't have to chose between two bowls of shit when I could have scooped some broccoli casserole into one instead.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 11:33 pm
Thread Rating:
|
FBI: No charges for Clinton
|
 RE: FBI: No charges for Clinton
July 9, 2016 at 2:56 am
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2016 at 3:18 am by ReptilianPeon.)
1 Donald is losing votes to Gary.
2. Hilary may yet yet indicted. James didn't confirm or deny whether Hilary is being investigated for corruption. The FBI investigation into the governor of Virginia relates to Clinton Foundation corruption and th e-mail investigation will have shed some more light on the Foundation. 3. There is an investigative journalist who I can't remember the name of. He did an audit of the Clinton Foundation last year and found that very little of its money actually goes to charity work. I think it was something ridiculous like around just 10% of income is used for charity work. 4. Hilary has been caught lying under oath. That's another problem for her. I think this is going to be investigated too. 5. The various election fraud lawsuits may throw up something unexpected. 6. New e-mail leaks. 7. Her Wall Street speech transcripts leaked. We can't forget those. They will be damaging for sure. 8. In other words, Hilary is still deep within the woods. She's terrible. Anybody who thinks that Hilary will be fine is living a fantasy.  (July 9, 2016 at 2:53 am)Losty Wrote: I shouldn't have to chose between two bowls of shit when I could have scooped some broccoli casserole into one instead. Very true, but is the political broccoli casserole an option? If Berine Sanders has a chance of winning. If ANYONE but Hilary and Trump has a chance of winning, then no one need vote for the less smelly shit bowl. Let's put it this way... if Trump becomes president I wonder how many people will be thinking "FUCK MORE PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE VOTED FOR HILARY!"  (July 9, 2016 at 3:44 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:(July 9, 2016 at 2:53 am)Losty Wrote: I shouldn't have to chose between two bowls of shit when I could have scooped some broccoli casserole into one instead. I'm not talking about voting here. I'm talking about nominating. We still don't have to nominate her.
The Libertarian and Green Party candidates are polling close to 20% combined. Upset Republicans who aren't afraid of Hilary more than Donald (but who still hate her) will likely vote Libertarian and this may be enough to deny Donald the Oval Office. You don't need to vote for Hilary. Donald will be blocked from doing most things by the rest of the government anyway.
The Libertarian Party advert looks pretty snazzy, it's bound to get them some more votes:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dL_qSDO0nu8 (July 9, 2016 at 3:59 am)Losty Wrote:(July 9, 2016 at 3:44 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Very true, but is the political broccoli casserole an option? Understood. I hope if someone else is nominated instead they have a chance of beating Trump better than she would if she was nominated 
 RE: FBI: No charges for Clinton
July 9, 2016 at 11:32 am
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2016 at 11:35 am by dyresand.)
(July 9, 2016 at 11:15 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:(July 9, 2016 at 3:59 am)Losty Wrote: I'm not talking about voting here. I'm talking about nominating. We still don't have to nominate her. Jill Stein is the female Bernie Sanders. Also this is a thing
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> (July 9, 2016 at 2:43 am)Losty Wrote: What now, though? My conscious and my politics both tell me that we cannot allow a Trump presidency. Hillary shouldn't even be the nominee. If you break the law on purpose and put the security of the entire nation at risk but you might not be sophisticated enough to know that that is illegal, you shouldn't even be allowed to run for president. You cannot strip a citizen of the right to run for office without first convicting them. I think that's as it should be. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
