|
Live stream of Dem Convention.
|
 (July 28, 2016 at 1:18 am)Tiberius Wrote: That is the most unbelievably stupid thing I've ever read about voting. You are an idiot. How so? If one votes for "A" and "B" wins, then by all logical standards that is a wasted vote.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
I think 15% in pre-election polls get you into the debates. 5% in the actual election gets you federal election funding.
RE: Live stream of Dem Convention.
July 28, 2016 at 1:26 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2016 at 1:27 am by Tiberius.)
(July 28, 2016 at 1:22 am)Maelstrom Wrote:(July 28, 2016 at 1:18 am)Tiberius Wrote: That is the most unbelievably stupid thing I've ever read about voting. You are an idiot. Perhaps you aren't quite aware of what elections are for. They aren't a competition where you go into a voting booth and try to guess who will win. You vote for who you *want* to win, not who you think will win. If your candidate doesn't win, it doesn't mean your vote was wasted, it means not enough people agreed with you. If Trump won the election, would you say that all Clinton voters wasted their vote and should have voted Trump? No. That would be ridiculous. Maybe you should stop lecturing people about politics when you apparently know fuck all about it.  (July 28, 2016 at 1:22 am)Tiberius Wrote: I think 15% in pre-election polls get you into the debates. 5% in the actual election gets you federal election funding. Johnson has a bigger chance getting into the pre-election debates he is ahead of Jill in that area.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> RE: Live stream of Dem Convention.
July 28, 2016 at 1:53 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2016 at 1:53 am by SteelCurtain.)
(July 28, 2016 at 12:28 am)dyresand Wrote: I wouldn't vote trump either to me they are both equally bags of shit. One being less of a hawkish on war one being really hawkish on war. You keep saying this dyre, but I fear you really are just repeating what's been parroted in the blogs you read. In what ways is Hillary too far right? What is your understanding of the TPP, that it is the most important election issue for you? 
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>(July 28, 2016 at 5:01 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: I don't know what you are talking about, and I think neither do you. In what way has she given the finger to Bernie voters? Off the top of my head: 1) Chose a conservative Democrat as a running mate rather than an actually progressive one. 2) Hired DWS to her campaign after she resigned from the DNC for rigging the primaries in favor of Clinton. Though it's #2 that I think most people are pissed about. If Clinton had completely disavowed DWS and her actions, said the DNC did all of it without her knowledge, then maybe some Sanders supporters would have voted for her. At the moment, the act of hiring DWS looks like some final piece in Clinton's master plan to steal the election. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
