Posts: 67295
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 1:42 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2016 at 1:43 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
There's a much easier way to "solve the ignosticism". It;s to remind people that god means whatever the individual proponent of the argument says it means. That we find their description absurd, implausible, or impossible, does not mean that their description does not exist. That the term doesn't have a meaning. It just has alot of different meanings to different people.
To make it more amusing, it would be like saying that the term car has no meaning (and the truth of propositions regarding them can therefore not be known) because you can't get people to agree on whether a mustang or a caravan is a real car.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2084
Threads: 7
Joined: August 14, 2016
Reputation:
10
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 3:16 pm
(August 21, 2016 at 1:42 pm)Rhythm Wrote: There's a much easier way to "solve the ignosticism". It;s to remind people that god means whatever the individual proponent of the argument says it means. That we find their description absurd, implausible, or impossible, does not mean that their description does not exist. That the term doesn't have a meaning. It just has alot of different meanings to different people.
To make it more amusing, it would be like saying that the term car has no meaning (and the truth of propositions regarding them can therefore not be known) because you can't get people to agree on whether a mustang or a caravan is a real car. Then I would say focus on form and function rather than label. What does a "God" need to be able to do/be to be considered a God?
Atheists are found of saying "If it demands worship, it's not a divine being" as a disqualifier, yes?. What are qualifiers if any?
All my encounters with God have been relatively benign, so the whole asshole in the sky demanding worship thing I'm going to have to take as hearsay and or libel.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Posts: 67295
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 3:25 pm
(August 21, 2016 at 3:16 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Then I would say focus on form and function rather than label. What does a "God" need to be able to do/be to be considered a God? Up to the individual believer.
Quote:Atheists are found of saying "If it demands worship, it's not a divine being" as a disqualifier, yes?. What are qualifiers if any?
How would I know, I don't believe in or propose any gods.
Quote:All my encounters with God have been relatively benign, so the whole asshole in the sky demanding worship thing I'm going to have to take as hearsay and or libel.
You have tea on sunday, hit the links? Maybe you go out on gods boat and catch a tarpon or something?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 7:48 pm
(August 21, 2016 at 9:22 am)theBorg Wrote: (August 21, 2016 at 8:01 am)robvalue Wrote: It may not even be a meaningful definition, because it assumes there actually was a first life form. This assumes either a finite past
Quote: "for a physicist infinity is monstrosity! In real world, there is no such thing as infinity." (the famous Dr. Michio Kaku, the Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. Kaku is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College...). Shall I give you my short (unpublished in the PRE) disproof of the infinite past?
I'm not aware that this quote has been demonstrated to be factually accurate. If it has, I'd be interested to know.
If your disproof is backed by evidence, sure. If it's just a logical argument, forget it.
Posts: 67295
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 8:12 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2016 at 8:13 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
People forget, sometimes, that a logical argument sans evidentiary support....... is just an exercise in game theory.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 8:18 pm
I'm happy to spam my video about it one more time to hammer the bastard home
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 8:45 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2016 at 8:46 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(August 21, 2016 at 9:22 am)theBorg Wrote: (August 21, 2016 at 8:01 am)robvalue Wrote: It may not even be a meaningful definition, because it assumes there actually was a first life form. This assumes either a finite past
Quote: "for a physicist infinity is monstrosity! In real world, there is no such thing as infinity." (the famous Dr. Michio Kaku, the Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. Kaku is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College...). Shall I give you my short (unpublished in the PRE) disproof of the infinite past?
Please, don't. I beg of you...
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 29855
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 8:56 pm
Oh what the hell.... Can't be any worse, can it?
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 22, 2016 at 1:47 am
Even if he manages it, his God can still be a piece of sputum.
Step 1: Overly simplistic models based on an intuitive understanding of observable reality, extrapolated to all of reality without justification.
Step 2: Logical steps with optional fallacies.
Step 3: Pre-drawn conclusion.
Feel free to miss out steps 1 and 2 for efficiency.
Posts: 101
Threads: 13
Joined: August 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 22, 2016 at 7:13 am
(August 21, 2016 at 7:48 pm)robvalue Wrote: (August 21, 2016 at 9:22 am)theBorg Wrote: Quote: "for a physicist infinity is monstrosity! In real world, there is no such thing as infinity." (the famous Dr. Michio Kaku, the Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. Kaku is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College...). Shall I give you my short (unpublished in the PRE) disproof of the infinite past?
I'm not aware that this quote has been demonstrated to be factually accurate. If it has, I'd be interested to know.
Since the measuring ruler has not an infinite number, and any place on the ruler has a certain number, then the line has a finite size. Therefore, there is no infinite past and integers line (1,2,3,4,....) is only potentially infinite, but not actually endless. Then there is no infinite future (the time runs out, as the Christians believe), and no infinite space too. No infinite velocity, but the velocity has limit: the v<c.
The Kaku agrees: "Michio Kaku: It's The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it (Infinity Equation is Impossible)", YouTube.
|