Question's for God.

[Angrboda]

No, that is weak evidence.

Oh, I see.
Now we have weak and strong evidence.
You are getting pretty good in inventing new bullshit  forms of expressions.
I should consider a Nobel prize for your intuition.  

I didn't invent it, dumbfuck.

The proposition that the brain gives rise to consciousness has been supported.  That's all that was claimed, and that was done already multiple times over.

You can support a building with solid concrete and steel and you can also support the same with a week frame.
Capish? (right?)  

So once again we see that you have a double standard, "Two Face" Rik.

So why doesn't this 'mean' that there is a literal heaven and hell instead?

Physical hell was invented by religious people long time ago probably in the middle ages.

Ancient Egypt

With the rise of the cult of Osiris during the Middle Kingdom the "democratization of religion" offered to even his humblest followers the prospect of eternal life, with moral fitness becoming the dominant factor in determining a person's suitability. At death a person faced judgment by a tribunal of forty-two divine judges. If they had led a life in conformance with the precepts of the Goddess Maat, who represented truth and right living, the person was welcomed into the Two Fields. If found guilty the person was thrown to a "devourer" and would be condemned to the lake of fire.

Wikipedia

The stories of a literal hell are as old as the stories told about yoga.  Was hell invented or discovered?  Only your bare assertion says 'invented'.  That's proof of nothing.

Nothing to do with God.
Paradise, samadhi, nirvana on the other hands have been witnessed by most if not all those who had
an NDE experience.

Hell is witnessed by many NDE experiences.  You're just picking and choosing what parts of NDEs to believe based on your religious beliefs.  That's dishonest.  It's cherry picking.

The pineal gland is the controller of all other glands.
It is based on the very top of the spinal cord for a reason like a general that is higher than all the rest.
So far science know very very little of the role of this gland.
How could she considering that physical science study physical things while the pineal gland is the door to enter the spiritual world?

So, in other words, you have no evidence here, either.  I'm shocked.  Shocked, I tell you!

The search for peace of mind and total bliss is a fool's errand.  They don't exist.  See?  I can make bare assertions too.  Now don't make me give you the pacifier and explain why.

Wrong again yog.  

In this very moment that you try to answer my question you do this in order to find peace of mind.
Once you may find the way to prove me wrong (it never happen anyway  ) you feel satisfied.
It happen all the time to all of us.
You may find peace of mind after you find solutions to your problems as well.
This peace of mind within the physical world is only temporary of course.
The permanent peace of mind will only come once you will have solved all your problems.

Blah, blah, blah.  More bare assertions and nary a bit of evidence.

Temporary peace of mind is real.  Permanent peace of mind is not.  You're just flinging shit from your ass here.

However considering that your problems are many I guess it will takes ages and ages.  

And there comes Pascal's Wager bringing up the rear.  How pathetic.

[Angrboda]

According to you, they are going to be reincarnated again anyway.  So what's the purpose of sending them back?  If you send them back, they get to work out their karma.  If you don't send them back, they get reincarnated and get to work out their karma.  You've given a reason that simply doesn't make sense.  Why do they need to be sent back if they're going to be reincarnated?


I thought about it plenty.  Enough to know that your answer was a bunch of twatwaffle.

Everyone is different because their karma is different.
For some one more life is enough to sort out their problems while for other is not so they will have to be reincarnated again and maybe again and again in order to sort out their many problems.
For other people that don't have any bad karma may even be reincarnated again and again.

What in hell does this have to do with whether being 'sent back' is pointless or not?

Take an atheist that doesn't have any bad karma but refuse to believe in afterlife.
This person will not get to heaven until he-she start believing that there is an afterlife.
Why God would let these people go to heaven if they are not interested.

Still not answering the question.

If they are happy to stay in a physical world for ever let them be in this physical world.
It is their choice and their free will.  

First you explained that their being sent back was because of karma.  Now you spend a whole post without answering the question.

Like I said, a bunch of twatwaffle.  Your 'evidence' is looking like a pile of ad libbed excuses.  Your excuses don't "make sense."

[Expired]

I believe in moogleragesh. I have a personal relationship with him. Teachings from my religion tell me that everyone on earth that is practicing one religion or another is wrong, and also people like you who believe in conciseness above a functioning brain need converting to my way of thinking. Pm me for details. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Mate.  

Your deep message left me all shaken.
Especially that about the ......conciseness.........
I think about your important message.
Please give me time to ponder your deep thought.  

It's called sarcasm love.

[Cyberman]

Rik doesn't know deep thought from deep throat. Both make him choke.

[Expired]

double

You have got a mattabooboo stuck to your chin.

[Little Rik]

Mate.  

Your deep message left me all shaken.
Especially that about the ......conciseness.........
I think about your important message.
Please give me time to ponder your deep thought.  

It's called sarcasm love.

Oh, my God!  

You really scare me with your questions about conciseness?  

Now that you tell me that was only sarcasm I feel so much better.  
Don't do it again mate.  

My heart is very weak.  

I couldn't take it again.  

[Little Rik]

Oh, I see.
Now we have weak and strong evidence.
You are getting pretty good in inventing new bullshit  forms of expressions.
I should consider a Nobel prize for your intuition.  

I didn't invent it, dumbfuck.

You can support a building with solid concrete and steel and you can also support the same with a week frame.
Capish? (right?)  

So once again we see that you have a double standard, "Two Face" Rik.

You just can't get it yog, do you?  

Physical hell was invented by religious people long time ago probably in the middle ages.

Ancient Egypt

With the rise of the cult of Osiris during the Middle Kingdom the "democratization of religion" offered to even his humblest followers the prospect of eternal life, with moral fitness becoming the dominant factor in determining a person's suitability. At death a person faced judgment by a tribunal of forty-two divine judges. If they had led a life in conformance with the precepts of the Goddess Maat, who represented truth and right living, the person was welcomed into the Two Fields. If found guilty the person was thrown to a "devourer" and would be condemned to the lake of fire.

Wikipedia

Well done yog.  

The stories of a literal hell are as old as the stories told about yoga.  Was hell invented or discovered? Only your bare assertion says 'invented'.  That's proof of nothing.

Nothing to do with God.
Paradise, samadhi, nirvana on the other hands have been witnessed by most if not all those who had
an NDE experience.

Hell is witnessed by many NDE experiences.  You're just picking and choosing what parts of NDEs to believe based on your religious beliefs.  That's dishonest.  It's cherry picking.

By many?
Not at all yog.
Only an handful of NDEs talk about hell and that to me is very very suspicious considering that most of these few talk about the holy Bible as the way to salvation.
To me it is obvious that these so called NDEs are made up in order to promote Christianity.

The pineal gland is the controller of all other glands.
It is based on the very top of the spinal cord for a reason like a general that is higher than all the rest.
So far science know very very little of the role of this gland.
How could she considering that physical science study physical things while the pineal gland is the door to enter the spiritual world?

So, in other words, you have no evidence here, either.  I'm shocked.  Shocked, I tell you!

If you are happy with the scientific explanation by all means stick to it.
I don't.  

Wrong again yog.  

In this very moment that you try to answer my question you do this in order to find peace of mind.
Once you may find the way to prove me wrong (it never happen anyway  ) you feel satisfied.
It happen all the time to all of us.
You may find peace of mind after you find solutions to your problems as well.
This peace of mind within the physical world is only temporary of course.
The permanent peace of mind will only come once you will have solved all your problems.

Blah, blah, blah.  More bare assertions and nary a bit of evidence.

Temporary peace of mind is real.  Permanent peace of mind is not.  You're just flinging shit from your ass here.

So you have evidence that.........Permanent peace of mind is not.......?

[Little Rik]

Everyone is different because their karma is different.
For some one more life is enough to sort out their problems while for other is not so they will have to be reincarnated again and maybe again and again in order to sort out their many problems.
For other people that don't have any bad karma may even be reincarnated again and again.

What in hell does this have to do with whether being 'sent back' is pointless or not?

There is no such a thing as a pointless thing in this regard.
Everything has got a good reason for happening.  

Take an atheist that doesn't have any bad karma but refuse to believe in afterlife.
This person will not get to heaven until he-she start believing that there is an afterlife.
Why God would let these people go to heaven if they are not interested.

Still not answering the question.

If you would ask a clear question I would reply a clear answer.
Unfortunately most of your questions are made up of babble and nothing else.

If they are happy to stay in a physical world for ever let them be in this physical world.
It is their choice and their free will.  

First you explained that their being sent back was because of karma.  Now you spend a whole post without answering the question.

Like I said, a bunch of twatwaffle.  Your 'evidence' is looking like a pile of ad libbed excuses.  Your excuses don't "make sense."

NDEs that are sent back is because of the karma that hasn't yet been exhausted.
In regard to those who are not interested or those who do not believe in a afterlife this is
a different story from the NDEs.
You didn't get it yog, did you?  

[Angrboda]

First you explained that their being sent back was because of karma.  Now you spend a whole post without answering the question.

Like I said, a bunch of twatwaffle.  Your 'evidence' is looking like a pile of ad libbed excuses.  Your excuses don't "make sense."

NDEs that are sent back is because of the karma that hasn't yet been exhausted.
In regard to those who are not interested or those who do not believe in a afterlife this is
a different story from the NDEs.
You didn't get it yog, did you?  

You're simply repeating the same assertion that I already debunked. You still haven't answered why they are being sent back if they're going to be reincarnated anyway. Your explanation makes no sense. A nonsensical explanation with "because karma" tacked on at the end doesn't constitute evidence for karma. And since your inference to reincarnation depended on the karma schtick, that bites the dust as well. So you have no rational reason for believing that their being 'sent back' is because of karma. And so your argument that NDEs are evidence of karma and reincarnation bites the dust.

You're 0-2 on this one, "No Evidence" Rik.

According to you, they are going to be reincarnated again anyway. So what's the purpose of sending them back? If you send them back, they get to work out their karma. If you don't send them back, they get reincarnated and get to work out their karma. You've given a reason that simply doesn't make sense. Why do they need to be sent back if they're going to be reincarnated?

[Little Rik]

NDEs that are sent back is because of the karma that hasn't yet been exhausted.
In regard to those who are not interested or those who do not believe in a afterlife this is
a different story from the NDEs.
You didn't get it yog, did you?  

You're simply repeating the same assertion that I already debunked.  You still haven't answered why they are being sent back if they're going to be reincarnated anyway.  Your explanation makes no sense.  A nonsensical explanation with "because karma" tacked on at the end doesn't constitute evidence for karma.  And since your inference to reincarnation depended on the karma schtick, that bites the dust as well.  So you have no rational reason for believing that their being 'sent back' is because of karma.  And so your argument that NDEs are evidence of karma and reincarnation bites the dust.

You're 0-2 on this one, "No Evidence" Rik.

According to you, they are going to be reincarnated again anyway.  So what's the purpose of sending them back?  If you send them back, they get to work out their karma.  If you don't send them back, they get reincarnated and get to work out their karma.  You've given a reason that simply doesn't make sense.  Why do they need to be sent back if they're going to be reincarnated?

You are lost in a sea of confusion yog.  

Didn't I said that everyone is different?  
Karma is all about actions and reactions.
If someone exhaust his-her reaction in one life then reincarnation is not needed.
If on the other hand one life is not enough then he-she will have to be reincarnated how many times as is needed to exhaust all his-her reactions.

Get it now?