(September 7, 2016 at 12:17 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: It's past your bedtime son. Go to bed.
Long before my bed time.
You now want to answer the question for the rest of us?
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Why can't creationists look through God?
|
(September 7, 2016 at 12:17 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: It's past your bedtime son. Go to bed. Long before my bed time. You now want to answer the question for the rest of us? Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (September 7, 2016 at 12:49 am)Minimalist Wrote:(September 7, 2016 at 12:27 am)ScienceAf Wrote: I see no reason for you to care unless you are afraid of this question in some way. Oh dear... It makes me very... Sad. OHH!!!!!
Young earth creationism is a special kind of stupid. Like, it's the gold medal performance at the Stupid Olympics. The gall to simply ignore geology, paleontology, astronomy... it's pretty amazing.
Run of the mill creationism gets special marks for its insidiousness, however. That its proponents have even convinced people that there's a controversy is astounding. But, Wizard's 1st Rule (which is likely the only thing I agree with Goodkind on).
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
ScienceAf Wrote:Why can't creationists look through God? I don't understand the question. (September 6, 2016 at 11:12 pm)ScienceAf Wrote: There's no evidence so... Religion has 2 purposes, neither of which requires evidence, accuracy or consistency. 1) It forms stupid persons in a population into groups which gives them resources to compete with other groups. 2) It gives the smarter ones among them a work-free gig as clerics who then can direct their group to trash other groups. Actually, evidence is harmful to these purposes as it is generally available to everyone for examination and might interfere with group preconceptions (like, 'we're God's number one people.')
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
What I can't understand is that so many Christians supposedly communicate with Jesus/Yahweh, yet they can't even agree on whether the very first book in the bible is literal or metaphorical. Why are they being told different things?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum (September 7, 2016 at 5:33 am)robvalue Wrote: What I can't understand is that so many Christians supposedly communicate with Jesus/Yahweh, yet they can't even agree on whether the very first book in the bible is literal or metaphorical. Why are they being told different things? People don't acknowledge the modern bible is a forgery and the original bible was the "Ingel." The reason the ingel got forged because people saw through it. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|