The 9 Catharses,questions that can destroy religion
September 29, 2016 at 11:06 am
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2016 at 11:13 am by Anonymousq.)
Ask any religious person these questions. Please help spread these:
If Please post your answers to these questions.
A Chatharses (Kuh-THAHR-SihS) for all religions
“THE RELIGIOUS CATHARSES
The Catharses is a set of questions that reveals.In this case the motives of a religion and how its believers think. To use these questions ask a believer, even one of Rationalism, Empiricism,or even Science, and see their motives and thoughts.
A Chatharse is a section of the set of questions that was considered related.
1.If you had no eternal reward, would you still follow, love, and/or serve your god?
*”your god” can be replaced with the believers god or whatever they follow”*
2.If you had political control over everything(the law, law enforcement, medical systems, education ect.) ,what would you do to those who did not follow God but still had basic principles of peace and was fully functional?(non-followers, homosexuals, transgenders, therianthropes ect.)
3.What would you define as sanity? Using this “definition” is your religion sane, and are transgenders(once defined as gender dysphoric), nonbelievers,other religious, rationalists, homosexuals(once was a mental disorder),and otherkin(can be diagnosed as species dysphoric if they associate physically) sane as well?
4.When god speaks to you, how do you know that you are not having a schizophrenic episode?
5.Is there any faults in your reasoning following up Catharse 4 and explain why?
6.Does the existence of God have to be disproven?
7.When testing for the validity of your beliefs, what could happen for them to be disproven and what could happen to proven them, and has either case happened in real life observed by yourself and others?
8.If you were the only person who believed, would you still believe and from your perspective, would you be considered sane?
9.Following up Chatharse 8, From other people's’ perspective, would you be considered sane? What would you do to convince them to your views? What evidence would you have?
By A PaStAfArIaN RATIONALIST who is partially a PrAgMaTiSt
“Practical Efficiency in a work is thoroughness without redundancy”
Which results a work with proficiency that
Demonstrates quality yet in a reasonable timeframe.
Which can be applied to knowledge, wisdom, and even breathing
(including everything else)
R’amen (Informal)
Arrr’men (semi-formal)
Arrgh’men (formal)
"We are Anonymous,
We are legion,
We do not forgive(let things slide by, we forgive, but we do not forgive carelessly)
We do not forget
We do freedom."
Expect Us.
For we have SWAG."
If Please post your answers to these questions.
A Chatharses (Kuh-THAHR-SihS) for all religions
“THE RELIGIOUS CATHARSES
The Catharses is a set of questions that reveals.In this case the motives of a religion and how its believers think. To use these questions ask a believer, even one of Rationalism, Empiricism,or even Science, and see their motives and thoughts.
A Chatharse is a section of the set of questions that was considered related.
1.If you had no eternal reward, would you still follow, love, and/or serve your god?
*”your god” can be replaced with the believers god or whatever they follow”*
2.If you had political control over everything(the law, law enforcement, medical systems, education ect.) ,what would you do to those who did not follow God but still had basic principles of peace and was fully functional?(non-followers, homosexuals, transgenders, therianthropes ect.)
3.What would you define as sanity? Using this “definition” is your religion sane, and are transgenders(once defined as gender dysphoric), nonbelievers,other religious, rationalists, homosexuals(once was a mental disorder),and otherkin(can be diagnosed as species dysphoric if they associate physically) sane as well?
4.When god speaks to you, how do you know that you are not having a schizophrenic episode?
5.Is there any faults in your reasoning following up Catharse 4 and explain why?
6.Does the existence of God have to be disproven?
7.When testing for the validity of your beliefs, what could happen for them to be disproven and what could happen to proven them, and has either case happened in real life observed by yourself and others?
8.If you were the only person who believed, would you still believe and from your perspective, would you be considered sane?
9.Following up Chatharse 8, From other people's’ perspective, would you be considered sane? What would you do to convince them to your views? What evidence would you have?
By A PaStAfArIaN RATIONALIST who is partially a PrAgMaTiSt
“Practical Efficiency in a work is thoroughness without redundancy”
Which results a work with proficiency that
Demonstrates quality yet in a reasonable timeframe.
Which can be applied to knowledge, wisdom, and even breathing
(including everything else)
R’amen (Informal)
Arrr’men (semi-formal)
Arrgh’men (formal)
"We are Anonymous,
We are legion,
We do not forgive(let things slide by, we forgive, but we do not forgive carelessly)
We do not forget
We do freedom."
Expect Us.
For we have SWAG."
