Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 2:35 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Faith No More Offline
Better living through chemistry
*****
Religious Views: It's a drug like any other
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation: 92
#21
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 9:17 pm
(November 21, 2016 at 8:39 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote:
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously.
Science doesn't care if you believe in it or not.

I would have gone with, "Evolution don't give a shit."
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Find
Reply
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 259
#22
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 9:20 pm
Quote:Even assuming the OP isn't a troll

Major league assumption there.
Find
Reply
Fireball Offline
Refractory Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9833
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation: 79
#23
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 9:36 pm
If we were made from dust, why is there still dust? I'll leave this joker to the rest of you.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Find
Reply
Cyberman Away
Beta cuck male
*****
Religious Views: Frisbeetarian
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation: 156
#24
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 10:00 pm
(November 21, 2016 at 9:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Even assuming the OP isn't a troll

Major league assumption there.

Yeah, but benefit of the doubt and all that bollocks. I heartily invite him to prove me wrong.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Find
Reply
brewer Offline Donators
Emotionally exhausted/Morally bankrupt
*****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 28261
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation: 90
#25
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 10:28 pm
Microevolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microevolution
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Find
Reply
robvalue Offline
Chainsaw of logic
*****
Religious Views: Time to wake up
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation: 155
#26
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 4:31 am
Go learn something and stop wasting our time.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Find
Reply
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
*******
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 45900
Threads: 537
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 109
#27
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 5:02 am
(November 21, 2016 at 10:00 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 21, 2016 at 9:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Major league assumption there.

Yeah, but benefit of the doubt and all that bollocks. I heartily invite him to prove me wrong.

He hasn't got time to prove you wrong, what with that bridge to live under and all those goats to deal with...

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply
I_am_not_mafia Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Gnostic atheist
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation: 88
#28
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 5:08 am
Wtf is it with all the theists using big bold fonts nowadays?


(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously.  If an idea is not testable, repeatable, observable, and falsifiable, it is not considered scientific, evolution is not science but a philosophical assumption a belief just like creationism.

Evolution is not
·        Testable
·        Repeatable
·        Observable
·        Falsifiable
Therefore evolution is not scientific

Demonstrate that evolution is not testable, repeatable, observable or falsifiable.

We can test for it by cross breeding animals, which has been done for centuries with cattle, chickens, foxes and dogs for example. This can be repeated. It has been observed both in nature and with genetic algorithms. It is falsifiable in that you could demonstrate that what we are observing works by means other than inherited traits, mutation of genetic information and natural selection.
Find
Reply
I_am_not_mafia Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Gnostic atheist
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation: 88
#29
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 5:09 am
(November 21, 2016 at 9:36 pm)Fireball Wrote: If we were made from dust, why is there still dust? I'll leave this joker to the rest of you.

I wish there wasn't dust. It sets my nose off.
Find
Reply
Jesster Offline
Your friendly neighborhood heathen
****
Religious Views: I am the creator goddess. Prove me wrong.
Posts: 3064
Threads: 3
Joined: July 10, 2016
Reputation: 37
#30
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 5:18 am
(November 22, 2016 at 5:08 am)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf is it with all the theists using big bold fonts nowadays?

They think it's adding emphasis and power to their argument to make it more convincing. In reality, it's causing people to skip over them and ignore them.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 10776 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 25184 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7013 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 634 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2827 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2605 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 13959 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 179325 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 14537 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1270 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)