EU official's daughter raped and murdered by "refugee"

[Edwardo Piet]

I don't like it when people fall out

[abaris]

I don't like it when people fall out

To fall out you first have to have something in common.

[Amarok]

Great now we never know anything

[Thumpalumpacus]

Yes, I already know you don't understand what I wrote. There's no need for you to reiterate your incomprehension.

Hopefully you improve your reading comprehension before our next conversation.

Yeh i don't get it.

You responded to me saying the thought that he's a Muslim is an assumption, but you weren't talking about my thought, or the thought of the BBC source, you were just talking about this abstract thought that someone somewhere was having?

so I'm not making the assumption he's a Muslim, neither is the BBC, who was it who was having the thought that was an assumption?

Perhaps you should reread the discussion? I'm certainly not going to repeat myself for your benefit, given this further demonstration of your incomprehension. You can go back and find my reply and perhaps, if you read the person's screen-name, figure out who it was.

[paulpablo]

Yeh i don't get it.

You responded to me saying the thought that he's a Muslim is an assumption, but you weren't talking about my thought, or the thought of the BBC source, you were just talking about this abstract thought that someone somewhere was having?

so I'm not making the assumption he's a Muslim, neither is the BBC, who was it who was having the thought that was an assumption?

Perhaps you should reread the discussion? I'm certainly not going to repeat myself for your benefit, given this further demonstration of your incomprehension. You can go back and find my reply and perhaps, if you read the person's screen-name, figure out who it was.

That's a fair request, I can copy and paste where I'm talking to you about the assumption he's a Muslim and you're replying back to me saying my assumtions mark me and say a lot about me.

So first it's an assumption that marks me and you were taking about even if MY assumption is correct. then you never said I made an assumption.

So who was it that made an assumption? Thoughts don't work independently of a human body so which person was it?

[Thumpalumpacus]

You really are this dense, aren't you?

[paulpablo]

You really are this dense, aren't you?

The I'm too clever to discuss things with you response I was waiting for.

You've said my assumptions mark me and say a lot about me, you've said you never said I made an assumption, all in the same thread.

So yes I admit I have no idea what you're talking about.

[paulpablo]

The police got the wrong guy. Do you perhaps see why making broad generalizations is counterproductive? How much of a head-start might the actual perpetrator gotten because the police were sidetracked by this fetishization of xenophobia?

And you, happy to promulgate it in the absence of good information.

Turns out the real suspect is now a Muslim Tunisian asylum seeker not a Muslim Pakistani refugee.

He was refused asylum, yes. Germany tried to send him back, but Tunisia said he wasn't Tunisian.

Given that, I reckon my point stands; he's only a suspect, and the thought that he's Muslim remains an assumption.

Then.

My point was not about the perpetrator himself. My point was about the assumptions made before the suspect's identity was known. Surely you're sharp enough to get the point.

I was disagreeing with the statement that it's only an assumption that the suspect is Muslim. 
Based on what I'd heard about the suspect and his background I'd say it's more than an assumption.

I was also pointing out that I don't know where you heard that he isn't Tunisian.
Every news source I've seen says he's Tunisian.

At the time that post was made, it was only an assumption. Do you need everything explained to you?

Which it wasn't because there was evidence the suspect was Muslim.

Then...

Pity you couldn't take the time to link that news so the readership could assay the source. I'm sure it was reputable, but no doubt others might wish to read for themselves.

Now what I'm going to explain to you is that my point is that your assumptions reveal a lot about yourself, whether or not you realize that. You can cry all you wish about "PC!" but your assumptions mark you. 

Your assumption was correct? That still doesn't give it the patina of reason.

Of course, you have to think to understand that much. Good luck on that score, and forgive my pessimism. I simply don't think you're up to it.

Talking about the assumptions I make until......

Well, the thing is, someone else -- not you -- was making an assumption, and you jumped in to proclaim you weren't like that ... as if anyone cared. And you never answered my question either, though you didn't mind being obstreperous.

And I know you had a conversation with alpha male before me but you were clearly replying to my post when I said the suspect was Muslim and saying to me that the thought the suspect is a Muslim is an assumption, which it wasn't.  And alpha male had nothing to do with the convo between me and you.

Also I didn't proclaim to not be like anything, I simply said as a matter of fact I never made an assumption and that there is evidence pointing to the suspect being Muslim at the time I made the claim the suspect is Muslim.

[Thumpalumpacus]

He was refused asylum, yes. Germany tried to send him back, but Tunisia said he wasn't Tunisian.

Given that, I reckon my point stands; he's only a suspect, and the thought that he's Muslim remains an assumption.

Then.

At the time that post was made, it was only an assumption. Do you need everything explained to you?

Which it wasn't because there was evidence the suspect was Muslim.

Then...

Pity you couldn't take the time to link that news so the readership could assay the source. I'm sure it was reputable, but no doubt others might wish to read for themselves.

Now what I'm going to explain to you is that my point is that your assumptions reveal a lot about yourself, whether or not you realize that. You can cry all you wish about "PC!" but your assumptions mark you. 

Your assumption was correct? That still doesn't give it the patina of reason.

Of course, you have to think to understand that much. Good luck on that score, and forgive my pessimism. I simply don't think you're up to it.

Talking about the assumptions I make until......

Well, the thing is, someone else -- not you -- was making an assumption, and you jumped in to proclaim you weren't like that ... as if anyone cared. And you never answered my question either, though you didn't mind being obstreperous.

And I know you had a conversation with alpha male before me but you were clearly replying to my post when I said the suspect was Muslim and saying to me that the thought the suspect is a Muslim is an assumption, which it wasn't.  And alpha male had nothing to do with the convo between me and you.

Also I didn't proclaim to not be like anything, I simply said as a matter of fact I never made an assumption and that there is evidence pointing to the suspect being Muslim at the time I made the claim the suspect is Muslim.

You'll notice I said you're promulgating assumptions. I didn't say that they were yours.

The next time you encounter an unfamiliar word, you'd ought to look it up before replying.

[paulpablo]

Then.


Which it wasn't because there was evidence the suspect was Muslim.

Then...


Talking about the assumptions I make until......



And I know you had a conversation with alpha male before me but you were clearly replying to my post when I said the suspect was Muslim and saying to me that the thought the suspect is a Muslim is an assumption, which it wasn't.  And alpha male had nothing to do with the convo between me and you.

Also I didn't proclaim to not be like anything, I simply said as a matter of fact I never made an assumption and that there is evidence pointing to the suspect being Muslim at the time I made the claim the suspect is Muslim.

You'll notice I said you're promulgating assumptions. I didn't say that they were yours.

The next time you encounter an unfamiliar word, you'd ought to look it up before replying.

Ok and I also wasn't promulgating any assumption since it was never an assumption.  The BBC were informed this person was a Muslim, this information was out there. They researched information provided to them by security services. Effective correct evidence was there. I was promoting informed, correct, information about this suspect being a Muslim.  He was known to have links with German Jihadist groups.